g the FCPA itself, since the [FCPA] does not criminalize the receipt ofa bribe by a foreign official.” United States v. Blondek, 741 FSupp. 116, 117 (N.D. Tex. 1990), affd United States v. Castle, 925 F.2d 831 (Sth Cir. 1991) (“We hold that foreign officials may not be prosecuted. under 18 U.S.C. § 37] for

Auth., 393 U.S. 268 (1969) 0. eeseeeccsesseeeeecees U.S. Bank Nat’l Ass’n v. Verizon Commce’ns, Inc., No. 10-CV-1842, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106657 (N.D. Tex. Sept. 19, 2011) ccccceseccscsnssseccsneecccsnseeccesnsseccesnseeccesnseeeeesnseeccennseeecennseeesees Ungar v. Palestine Liberation Org., 402 F.3d

, 2008 WL 2139518, at *2 (S.D. Fla. May 7, 2008); see also Trac/one Wireless. Inc. v. King Trading, Inc., No. 3-08-CV-0398-B, 2008 WL 918243, at *1 (N.D. Tex. Mar. 13, 2008) (finding "a legitimate concern for the continuing existence and maintenance of the integrity of the evidence in question absent an

ility LLC v. Dynamic Cellular Corp., 2008 WL 2139518 (S.D. Fla. May 7, 2008); Tracfone Wireless, Inc. v. King Trading, Inc., 2008 WL 918243, at *1 (N.D. Tex. Mar. 13, 2008) (finding "a legitimate concern for the continuing existence and maintenance of the integrity of the evidence in question absent an

Cir. 2004) 8 United States v. Harvey, 791 F.2d 294 (4th Cir. 1986) 12 United States v. Mariamma Viju (01), No. 3:15-CR-0240-B, 2016 WL 107841 (N.D. Tex. Jan. 11, 2016) 6 United States v. Padilla, 186 F.3d 136 (2d Cir. 1999) 10 EFTA00028882 --- PAGE BREAK --- United States v. Sattar, 272 F.