DELLAQUILA,STEPHEN EVANS,MITCHELL R GUSTAVSON,TROY E GUARI,NICOLE M COHON,GEORGE

e Project v. Missouri, 484 U.S. 495, 517(1988)). Further, the statute at issue must be considered as a “symmetrical and coherent regulatory scheme.”’ Gustafson v. Alloyd Co., 513 U.S. 561, 569, 115 S.Ct. 1061, 131 L.Ed.2d 1 (1995). In our case, the exercise of rulemaking authority under Section 6 is not self

, 935 F.2d 385, 389-90 (1st Cir. 1991); see also United States v. Hoschouer, 224 Fed. Appx. 923, 926-27 (11th Cir. 2007) (unpublished opinion); cf. Gustafson v. Allovd Co.. Inc., 513 U.S. 561, 570 (1995) ("[W]e adhere[' to the normal rule ... that "identical words used in different parts of -27- EFTA0018

is 935 F.2d 385, 389-90 (1st Cir. 1991); see also United States'. Hoschouer, 224 Fed. Appx. 923, 926-27 (11th Cir. 2007) (unpublished opinion); cf. Gustafson'. Alloyd Co.. Inc., 513 U.S. 561, 570 (1995) ("[W]e adhere[] to the normal rule ... that "identical words used in different parts of -27- Case No.

, 935 F.2d 385, 389-90 (1st Cir. 1991); see also United States v. Hoschouer, 224 Fed. Appx. 923, 926-27 (11th Cir. 2007) (unpublished opinion); cf. Gustafson v. Allovd Co.. Inc., 513 U.S. 561, 570 (1995) ("[W]e adhere[' to the normal rule ... that "identical words used in different parts of -27- EFTA0021

, 935 F.2d 385, 389-90 (1st Cir. 1991); see also United States v. Hoschouer, 224 Fed. Appx. 923, 926-27 (11th Cir. 2007) (unpublished opinion); cf. Gustafson v. Allovd Co.. Inc., 513 U.S. 561, 570 (1995) ("[W]e adhere[' to the normal rule ... that "identical words used in different parts of -27- EFTA0021

, 935 F.2d 385, 389-90 (1st Cir. 1991); see also United States v. Hoschouer, 224 Fed. Appx. 923, 926-27 (11th Cir. 2007) (unpublished opinion); cf. Gustafson v. Allovd Co.. Inc., 513 U.S. 561, 570 (1995) ("[W]e adhere[' to the normal rule ... that "identical words used in different parts of -27- EFTA0022

, 935 F.2d 385, 389-90 (1st Cir. 1991); see also United States v. Hoschouer, 224 Fed. Appx. 923, 926-27 (11th Cir. 2007) (unpublished opinion); cf. Gustafson v. Allovd Co.. Inc., 513 U.S. 561, 570 (1995) ("[W]e adhere[' to the normal rule ... that "identical words used in different parts of -27- EFTA0022

thamist (07/17, Hurewltz•Ravitch), New York Daily News (07/17, Annese), amNewYork (07/17, Moses), SlLive (07/17, Axelrod), and P IX (CW. 11) (07/17, Gustafson). Judge Tosses Lawsuit Seeking to Shield Names of FBI Agents on Capitol Riot Probe Reuters (07/17, Goudsward) reported that a U.S. Judge, Jia Cobb,

thamist (07/17, Hurewltz•Ravitch), New York Daily News (07/17, Annese), amNewYork (07/17, Moses), SlLive (07/17, Axelrod), and P IX (CW. 11) (07/17, Gustafson). Judge Tosses Lawsuit Seeking to Shield Names of FBI Agents on Capitol Riot Probe Reuters (07/17, Goudsward) reported that a U.S. Judge, Jia Cobb,

ion Federal Aviation Administration December 10, 1999 Mr. Jan W. Gustafson Raytheon Aircraft Company PO Box 85 Wichita, Kansas 67201 Dear Mr. Gustafson: Flight Standards SeMce P.O. Box 25504 Civil Aviation Registry, AFS-700 Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73125-0504 United States identification mark N78

A00013166 U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration July 7, 1999 Raytheon Aircraft Company Wichita KS 67201 Dear Mr. Gustafson: Fight Standards Service CM Aviation Registry. AFS-700 PM"'Oklahoma 73125-0504 United States identification mark N428HR has been assigned to Ray

01 Trainpodallm Federal Aviation Administration July 7, 1999 Mr. Jan Gustafson Raytheon Aircraft Company PO Box 85 Wichita KS 67201 Dear Mr. Gustafson: Fight Standards Soaks clvi Aviation RagIskso. MS-700 P.O. Box 25504 Oklahoma City. Oklahoma 73125-0504 United States identification mark N428HR

f Transportation Federal Aviation Administration July 7, 1999 Mr. Jan Gustafson Raytheon Aircraft Company PO Box 85 Wichita KS 67201 Dear Mr. Gustafson: Fight Standards Sallie.. Civil Aviation Registry. AFS-700 2-/ P.O. Box 25504 °Idahoan City. Oklahoma 73125-0504 United States identification m

her sections of the Mann Act shows that Congress likewise did not intend to require proof of knowledge of age to violate those sections either. See Gustafson v. Alloyd Ox, Inc., 513 U.S. 561, 570 (1995) (noting the "normal rule of statutory construction" that "identical words used in different parts of th