nity and privacy”). °l OLC CVRA Rights Memo, supra note 2, at 6 n.6. ° 367 F. Supp. 2d 319 (E.D.N.Y. 2005). 3 No. 6:07-1389-GRA-WMC, 2007 WL 1875802 (D.S.C. June 27, 2007). 4 No. 6:06-1418-GRA-WMC, 2006 WL 1677177 (D.S.C. June 16, 2006). °5 OLC CVRA Rights Memo, supra note 2, at 6 n.6. °° Turner, 367 F. S

y charging instrument is filed." '!4 As a result, OLC [*80] vastly overstates its position when it asserts 3 No. 6:07-1389-GRA-WMC, 2007 WL 1875802 (D.S.C. June 27, 2007). 4 No. 6:06-1418-GRA-WMC, 2006 WL 1677177 (D.S.C. June 16, 2006). °5 OLC CVRA Rights Memo, supra note 2, at 6 n.6. 6 Turner, 367 F.

W.R. Huff Asset Mgmt. Co., 409 F.3d 555, 564 (2d Cir. 2005) (emphasis added); accord Searcy v. Skinner, No. 6:06-1418-GRA-WMC, 2006 WL 1677177, at 2 (D.S.C. June 16, 2006). Like the constitutional amendment it was patterned on, the CVRA extends rights against the government - that is, rights "not to be vi