I 70:3:aleg 561.840.8)37 PP/CV 4.04 0.00 0.00 0.4 770 Jul 2) 10:20 MI V RUM 03402 341.121.421 59 3404 0.00 0.00 0.00 777 J41 2) 1004 PM Zeeman 541.561.5441 PP 2.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 774 J41 2) 10.0 FPI leconleg 541.010.1035 PP 4.04 0.00 0.00 779 Jul 2) 10:51 MI V PAM 937,9E 341.1

licator equation, in which general payoffs are inter- preted as contributions to individual fitness (Taylor and Jonker, 1978; Hofbauer et al., 1979; Zeeman, 1980; Schuster and Sigmund, 1983; Hofbauer and Sigmund, 1988, 1998) provides an evolution- ary setting for the classification of two-player games.

Chris Zeeman named a normal factor. It is the smooth growth of the material wave of mesodermal (to become muscle, connective tissue and bone) tissue. Zeeman called the front to back dimensional gradient of influence, the secondary wave of adhesiveness, the splitting factor. The value of this secondary wav

ally-relevant analog computer discoveries about the Van der Pol and comparable periodically forced, dissipative (energy utilizing) Duffing equations (Zeeman, 1976) were made in the early 1960’s by electrical engineer, Yoshi Ueda (1992), but his thesis director, Chihiro Hayashi of Japan’s Kyoto University,

of graphic representations of their geometric and topological forms. Notably successful examples can be found in the work of Thom, Arnold (1984) and Zeeman (1977), who were inspired by “caustics” (the shapes made on surfaces by the coincidence of reflected or refracted light rays) and Whitney’s represent

or cultural. The traditional approach to evolutionary game theory is based on the replicator equation (Taylor & .Jonker 1978, Hofbauer et al 1979, Zeeman 1980, Hofbauer & Sigmund 1988,1998, 2003, Cressman 2003), which examines deterministic dynamics in infinitely large, well-mixed populations. Many o