10/5/2015 http:/Avww.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2974613/Jeffrey- Epstein-sex-slave-money-hungry-sex-kitten-enjoyed-role-travelling-masseuse-former-friends-clai... Jeffrey Epstein ‘sex slave’ Virginia Roberts was a'money-hungry sex kitten’, ex friends claim | Daily Mail Online ‘millionaire's house’ for a day or two, before returning with cash. He did say that she tried to get out of the sex business, but was dragged back in. Last month it was revealed Roberts accused two male acquaintances she was raped, bringing her credibility into question. Roberts’ lawyers says the latest allegations do not contend the fact she was used for underage sex. Attorney Sigrid McCawleysaid : "To say that our client acquiesced in this abuse, or that the abuse was OK because she was paid for it — leaves out the fact that this is why we have laws in the United States to protect minor children who are groomed and sexually trafficked by adults.’ Epstein served 13 months in a Florida prison after pleading guilty in 2008 to soliciting a minor for prostitution. Allegations: The 31-year-old is currently in the midst of a lawsuit claiming she was recruited to join Epstein’s harem of underage women in 1999, naming Prince Andrew and attorney Alan Dershowitz as two of the men she was made to ‘service’ SHARE THIS RELATED ARTICLES ARTICLE Fugitive American sect leader arrested in Brazil over... Disgraced entertainer Rolf Harris to be stripped of his CBE... SPONSORED Make a career out of your hobby? Revenge porn blackmailer threatened to tell married =_ 133 sreres The scandal resurfaced in January when Roberts named Prince Andrew in a lawsuit, accusing him of using her for underage sex. According to court records connected with Roberts’ current lawsuit, she maintains that she was recruited to join Epstein's harem in 1999 by his friend, the socialite Ghislaine Maxwell. She says during the three years she worked for Epstein, she was made to entertain his friends and named Prince Andrew and Dershowitz as two men she had sex with. Both men have denied having sex with Roberts, and Dershowitz is trying to get his name removed from the suit, claiming Roberts made the entire story up. and booted as she heads out to work in elegant pinstriped ensemble George's better half ‘He can go f*** himself: Kris Jenner's rant over Caitlyn's negative portrayal of her in Vanity Fair article... on Keeping Up With The Kardashians Her sun and stars! Emilia Clarke reunites with former Game of Thrones love interest Jason Momoa during Paris Fashion Week Two looked very close It's in the genes! Meg Ryan's son Jack Quaid cracks up his famous mom as they enjoy a Sunday stroll in New York City Had his mom in stitches From matching tattoos and annual weddings to gifts of $40 million private jets, the craziest things celebrities have done for love Sponsored Attached at the hip! Christie Brinkley, 61, radiates as she and new boyfriend John Mellencamp leave hotel in NYC... following date the night before ‘She's lost her spark’: Sir Tom Jones reveals his reclusive wife's battle with depression but insists their marriage is ‘solid’ after 58 years Emily Blunt reveals she became US citizen for tax reasons after sparking outrage by saying she regretted the decision following a Republican debate Christina Milian shows off her curves and pert derriere ina skimpy animal print bikini while cavorting witha mystery male in Miami Barely there two-piece WASHINGTON DC The art of the fake baby bump: Celebrities’ most convincing on-screen pregnancies (and how HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015529 2/21

EXHIBIT G HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015530

Case 1:15-cv-07433 Document1 Filed 09/21/15 Page 1 of 12 United States District Court Southern District of New York VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, Plaintiff, CASE NO: V. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. / COMPLAINT Boies Schiller & Flexner LLP 575 Lexington Avenue New York, NY 10022 (212) 446-2300 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015531

Case 1:15-cv-07433 Document1 Filed 09/21/15 Page 2 of 12 Plaintiff, VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, formerly known as Virginia Roberts (“Giuffre”), for her Complaint against Defendant, GHISLAINE MAXWELL (“Maxwell”), avers upon personal knowledge as to her own acts and status and otherwise upon information and belief: NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. This suit arises out of Defendant Maxwell’s defamatory statements against Plaintiff Giuffre. As described below, Giuffre was a victim of sexual trafficking and abuse while she was a minor child. Defendant Maxwell not only facilitated that sexual abuse but, most recently, wrongfully subjected Giuffre to public ridicule, contempt and disgrace by, among other things, calling Giuffre a liar in published statements with the malicious intent of discrediting and further damaging Giuffre worldwide. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 2. This is an action for damages in an amount in excess of the minimum jurisdictional limits of this Court. 3. This Court has jurisdiction over this dispute pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1332 (diversity jurisdiction) as Giuffre and Maxwell are citizens of different states and the amount in controversy exceeds seventy-five thousand ($75,000), exclusive of interest and costs. 4, This Court has personal jurisdiction over Maxwell. Maxwell resides in New York City, and this action arose, and defamatory statements were made, within the Southern District of New York. 5. Venue is proper in this Court as the cause of action arose within the jurisdiction of this Court. HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015532

Case 1:15-cv-07433 Document1 Filed 09/21/15 Page 3 of 12 PARTIES 6. Plaintiff Giuffre is an individual who is a citizen of the State of Colorado. 7. Defendant Maxwell, who is domiciled in the Southern District of New York, is not a citizen of the state of Colorado. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS 8. Virginia Giuffre became a victim of sex trafficking and repeated sexual abuse after being recruited by Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein when Giuffre was under the age of eighteen. 9. Between 1999 and 2002, with the assistance and participation of Maxwell, Epstein sexually abused Giuffre at numerous locations including his mansions in West Palm Beach, Florida, and in this District. Between 2001 and 2007, with the assistance of numerous co-conspirators, Epstein abused more than thirty (30) minor underage girls, a fact confirmed by state and federal law enforcement. 10. _— As part of their sex trafficking efforts, Epstein and Maxwell intimidated Giuffre into remaining silent about what had happened to her. 11. In September 2007, Epstein entered into a Non-Prosecution Agreement (“NPA”) that barred his prosecution for numerous federal sex crimes in the Southern District of Florida. 12. ‘In the NPA, the United States additionally agreed that it would not institute any federal criminal charges against any potential co-conspirators of Epstein. 13. Asa co-conspirator of Epstein, Maxwell was consequently granted immunity in the Southern District of Florida through the NPA. 14. —_ Epstein ultimately pled guilty to procuring a minor for prostitution, and is now a registered sex offender. HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015533

Case 1:15-cv-07433 Document1 Filed 09/21/15 Page 4 of 12 15. Rather than confer with the victims about the NPA, the U.S. Attorney’s Office and Epstein agreed to a “confidentiality” provision in the Agreement barring its disclosure to anyone—including Epstein’s victims. As a consequence, the victims were not told about the NPA. 16. On July 7, 2008, a young woman identified as Jane Doe No. 1, one of Jeffrey Epstein’s victims (other than Giuffre), filed a petition to enforce her rights under the Crime Victims’ Rights Act (“CVRA”), 18 U.S.C. § 3771, alleging that the Government failed to provide her the rights promised in the CVRA with regard to the plea arrangement with Epstein. The litigation remains ongoing. i On or about May 4, 2009, Virginia Giuffre—identified then as Jane Doe No. 102—filed a complaint against Jeffrey Epstein in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The complaint included allegations made by Giuffre that pertained to Maxwell. 18. In pertinent part, the Jane Doe No. 102 complaint described in detail how Maxwell recruited Giuffre (who was then a minor girl) to become a victim of sex trafficking by introducing Giuffre to Jeffrey Epstein. With the assistance of Maxwell, Epstein was able to sexually abuse Giuffre for years until Giuffre eventually escaped. 19. The Jane Doe No. 102 complaint contained the first public allegations made on behalf of Giuffre regarding Maxwell. 20. As civil litigation against Epstein moved forward on behalf of Giuffre and many other similarly-situated victims, Maxwell was served with a subpoena for deposition. Her testimony was sought concerning her personal knowledge and role in Epstein’s abuse of Giuffre and others. HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015534

Case 1:15-cv-07433 Document1 Filed 09/21/15 Page 5 of 12 21. To avoid her deposition, Maxwell claimed that her mother fell deathly ill and that consequently she was leaving the United States for London with no plans of ever returning. In fact, however, within weeks of using that excuse to avoid testifying, Maxwell had returned to New York. 22. In 2011, two FBI agents located Giuffre in Australia—where she had been hiding from Epstein and Maxwell for several years—and arranged to meet with her at the US. Consulate in Sidney. Guuffre provided truthful and accurate information to the FBI about Epstein and Maxwell’s sexual abuse. 23. | Ultimately, as a mother and one of Epstein’s many victims, Giuffre believed that she should speak out about her sexual abuse experiences in hopes of helping others who had also suffered from sexual trafficking and abuse. 24. On December 23, 2014, Giuffre incorporated an organization called Victims Refuse Silence, Inc., a Florida not-for-profit corporation. 25. Giuffre intended Victims Refuse Silence to change and improve the fight against sexual abuse and human trafficking. The goal of her organization was, and continues to be, to help survivors surmount the shame, silence, and intimidation typically experienced by victims of sexual abuse. Giuffre has now dedicated her professional life to helping victims of sex trafficking. 26. On December 30, 2014, Giuffre moved to join the on-going litigation previously filed by Jane Doe 1 in the Southern District of Florida challenging Epstein’s non-prosecution agreement by filing her own joinder motion. HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015535

Case 1:15-cv-07433 Document1 Filed 09/21/15 Page 6 of 12 27. Giuffre’s motion described Maxwell’s role as one of the main women who Epstein used to procure under-aged girls for sexual activities and a primary co-conspirator and participant in his sexual abuse and sex trafficking scheme. 28. In January, 2015, Maxwell undertook a concerted and malicious campaign to discredit Giuffre and to so damage her reputation that Giuffre’s factual reporting of what had happened to her would not be credited. 29. As part of Maxwell’s campaign she directed her agent, Ross Gow, to attack Giuffre’s honesty and truthfulness and to accuse Giuffre of lying. 30. On or about January 3, 2015, speaking through her authorized agent, Maxwell issued an additional false statement to the media and public designed to maliciously discredit Giuffre. That statement contained the following deliberate falsehoods: (a) That Giuffre’s sworn allegations “against Ghislaine Maxwell are untrue.” (b) That the allegations have been “shown to be untrue.” (c) That Giuffre’s “claims are obvious lies.” Sls Maxwell’s January 3, 2015, statement incorporated by reference “Ghislaine Maxwell’s original response to the lies and defamatory claims remains the same,” an earlier statement that had falsely described Giuffre’s factual assertions as “entirely false” and “entirely untrue.” 32. Maxwell made the same false and defamatory statements as set forth above, in the Southern District of New York and elsewhere in a deliberate effort to maliciously discredit Giuffre and silence her efforts to expose sex crimes committed around the world by Maxwell, Epstein, and other powerful persons. Maxwell did so with the purpose and effect of having HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015536

Case 1:15-cv-07433 Document1 Filed 09/21/15 Page 7 of 12 others repeat such false and defamatory statements and thereby further damaged Giuffre’s reputation. 33. | Maxwell made her statements to discredit Giuffre in close consultation with Epstein. Maxwell made her statements knowing full well they were false. 34. | Maxwell made her statements maliciously as part of an effort to conceal sex trafficking crimes committed around the world by Maxwell, Epstein and other powerful persons. 35. | Maxwell intended her false and defamatory statements set out above to be broadcast around the world and to intimidate and silence Giuffre from making further efforts to expose sex crimes committed by Maxwell, Epstein, and other powerful persons. 36. | Maxwell intended her false statements to be specific statements of fact, including a statement that she had not recruited an underage Giuffre for Epstein’s abuse. Maxwell’s false statements were broadcast around the world and were reasonably understood by those who heard them to be specific factual claims by Maxwell that she had not helped Epstein recruit or sexually abuse Giuffre and that Giuffre was a liar. Shs On or about January 4, 2015, Maxwell continued her campaign to falsely and maliciously discredit Giuffre. When a reporter on a Manhattan street asked Maxwell about Giuffre’s allegations against Maxwell, she responded by saying: “I am referring to the statement that we made.” The New York Daily News published a video of this response by Maxwell indicating that she made her false statements on East 65" Street in Manhattan, New York, within the Southern District of New York. HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015537

Case 1:15-cv-07433 Document1 Filed 09/21/15 Page 8 of 12 COUNT I DEFAMATION 1. Plaintiff Giuffre re-alleges paragraphs 1 - 37 as if the same were fully set forth herein. Maxwell made her false and defamatory statements deliberately and maliciously with the intent to intimidate, discredit and defame Giuffre. 2. In January 2015, and thereafter, Maxwell intentionally and maliciously released to the press her false statements about Giuffre in an attempt to destroy Giuffre’s reputation and cause her to lose all credibility in her efforts to help victims of sex trafficking. 3. Maxwell additionally released to the press her false statements with knowledge that her words would dilute, discredit and neutralize Giuffre’s public and private messages to sexual abuse victims and ultimately prevent Giuffre from effectively providing assistance and advocacy on behalf of other victims of sex trafficking, or to expose her abusers. 4. Using her role as a powerful figure with powerful friends, Maxwell’s statements were published internationally for the malicious purpose of further damaging a sexual abuse and sexual trafficking victim; to destroy Giuffre’s reputation and credibility; to cause the world to disbelieve Giuffre; and to destroy Giuffre’s efforts to use her experience to help others suffering as sex trafficking victims. Se Maxwell, personally and through her authorized agent, Ross Gow, intentionally and maliciously made false and damaging statements of fact concerning Giuffre, as detailed above, in the Southern District of New York and elsewhere. 6. The false statements made by Gow were all made by him as Maxwell’s authorized agent and were made with direct and actual authority from Maxwell as the principal. HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015538

Case 1:15-cv-07433 Document1 Filed 09/21/15 Page 9 of 12 7. The false statements that Maxwell made personally, and through her authorized agent Gow, not only called Giuffre’s truthfulness and integrity into question, but also exposed Giuffre to public hatred, contempt, ridicule, and disgrace. 8. Maxwell made her false statements knowing full well that they were completely false. Accordingly, she made her statements with actual and deliberate malice, the highest degree of awareness of falsity. oD, Maxwell’s false statements constitute libel, as she knew that they were going to be transmitted in writing, widely disseminated on the internet and in print. Maxwell intended her false statements to be published by newspaper and other media outlets internationally, and they were, in fact, published globally, including within the Southern District of New York. 10. | Maxwell’s false statements constitute libel per se inasmuch as they exposed Guuffre to public contempt, ridicule, aversion, and disgrace, and induced an evil opinion of her in the minds of right-thinking persons. 11. | Maxwell’s false statements also constitute libel per se inasmuch as they tended to injure Giuffre in her professional capacity as the president of a non-profit corporation designed to help victims of sex trafficking, and inasmuch as they destroyed her credibility and reputation among members of the community that seeks her help and that she seeks to serve. 12. | Maxwell’s false statements directly stated and also implied that in speaking out against sex trafficking Giuffre acted with fraud, dishonesty, and unfitness for the task. Maxwell’s false statements directly and indirectly indicate that Giuffre lied about being recruited by Maxwell and sexually abused by Epstein and Maxwell. Maxwell’s false statements were reasonably understood by many persons who read her statements as conveying that specific intention and meaning. HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015539

Case 1:15-cv-07433 Document1 Filed 09/21/15 Page 10 of 12 13. | Maxwell’s false statements were reasonably understood by many persons who read those statements as making specific factual claims that Giuffre was lying about specific facts. 14. Maxwell specifically directed her false statements at Giuffre’s true public description of factual events, and many persons who read Maxwell’s statements reasonably understood that those statements referred directly to Giuffre’s account of her life as a young teenager with Maxwell and Epstein. 15. | Maxwell intended her false statements to be widely published and disseminated on television, through newspapers, by word of mouth and on the internet. As intended by Maxwell, her statements were published and disseminated around the world. 16. Maxwell coordinated her false statements with other media efforts made by Epstein and other powerful persons acting as Epstein’s representatives and surrogates. Maxwell made and coordinated her statements in the Southern District of New York and elsewhere with the specific intent to amplify the defamatory effect those statements would have on Giuffre’s reputation and credibility. 17. | Maxwell made her false statements both directly and through agents who, with her general and specific authorization, adopted, distributed, and published the false statements on Maxwell’s behalf. In addition, Maxwell and her authorized agents made false statements in reckless disregard of their truth or falsity and with malicious intent to destroy Giuffre’s reputation and credibility; to prevent her from further disseminating her life story; and to cause persons hearing or reading Giuffre’s descriptions of truthful facts to disbelieve her entirely. Maxwell made her false statements wantonly and with the specific intent to maliciously damage Giuffre’s good name and reputation in a way that would destroy her efforts to administer her 10 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015540

Case 1:15-cv-07433 Document1 Filed 09/21/15 Page 11 of 12 non-profit foundation, or share her life story, and thereby help others who have suffered from sexual abuse. 18. Asa result of Maxwell’s campaign to spread false, discrediting and defamatory statements about Giuffre, Giuffre suffered substantial damages in an amount to be proven at trial. 19. Maxwell’s false statements have caused, and continue to cause, Giuffre economic damage, psychological pain and suffering, mental anguish and emotional distress, and other direct and consequential damages and losses. 20. | Maxwell’s campaign to spread her false statements internationally was unusual and particularly egregious conduct. Maxwell sexually abused Giuffre and helped Epstein to sexually abuse Giuffre, and then, in order to avoid having these crimes discovered, Maxwell wantonly and maliciously set out to falsely accuse, defame, and discredit Giuffre. In so doing, Maxwell’s efforts constituted a public wrong by deterring, damaging, and setting back Giuffre’s efforts to help victims of sex trafficking. Accordingly, this is a case in which exemplary and punitive damages are appropriate. 21. | Punitive and exemplary damages are necessary in this case to deter Maxwell and others from wantonly and maliciously using a campaign of lies to discredit Giuffre and other victims of sex trafficking. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Giuffre respectfully requests judgment against Defendant Maxwell, awarding compensatory, consequential, exemplary, and punitive damages in an amount to be determined at trial, but in excess of the $75,000 jurisdictional requirement; costs of suit; attorneys’ fees; and such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper. 11 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015541

Case 1:15-cv-07433 Document1 Filed 09/21/15 Page 12 of 12 JURY DEMAND Plaintiff hereby demands a trial by jury on all causes of action asserted within this pleading. Dated September 21, 2015. /s/ David Boies David Boies Boies Schiller & Flexner LLP 333 Main Street Armonk, NY 10504 /s/ Sigrid McCawley Sigrid McCawley (Pro Hac Vice Pending) Boies Schiller & Flexner LLP 401 E. Las Olas Blvd., Suite 1200 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 (954) 356-0011 /s/ Ellen Brockman Ellen Brockman Boies Schiller & Flexner LLP 575 Lexington Ave New York, New York 10022 (212) 446-2300 2 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015542

EXHIBIT H HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015543

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: CACE 15-000072 BRADLEY J. EDWARDS and PAUL G. CASSELL, Plaintiff(s), vs. ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, Defendant(s). / NOTICE OF SERVING ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES Plaintiffs, Bradley J. Edwards and Paul G. Cassell, by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby file this Notice of Serving Answers to Interrogatories with the Court propounded by the Defendant, ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, on February 11, 2015, and that a copy has been furnished to the attorney for the Defendant. I] HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve poof. a to all Counsel on the attached list, this | 2 day of [ain , 2015. KSCAROLA Seb) Les Florida Bar No.: 169440 Attorney E-Mail(s): [email protected] and [email protected] Primary E-Mail: [email protected] Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Phone: (561) 686-6300 Fax: (561) 383-9451 Attorneys for Plaintiffs HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015544

13. Describe in detail Each instance in which Jane Doe #3 has provided information referencing Dershowitz by name that Concern the allegations set forth in Paragraphs 24-31 of the 2015 Jane Doe #3 Declaration. ANSWER: Edwards and Cassell lack sufficient information to determine all circumstances in which Jane Doe No. 3 has mentioned to others Dershowitz’s name as someone who abused her or had information relevant to abuse. With regard to when she has provided information related to this subject to them, Jane Doe No. 3 provided such information in telephone calls with Brad Edwards beginning in 2011. Jane Doe No. 3 has also provided this information in a public affidavit, filed on January 21, 2015, in the CVRA case. Jane Doe No. 3 has also provided similar information on other occasions, but the specifics of those communications are protected by the attorney-client privilege and the work product doctrine. 14. If You have ever seen a photograph or video of Jane Doe #3 with Dershowitz, then state when You saw the photograph or video, identify who took the original photograph or video, identify Each person who possesses a copy of the photograph or video, and state the location of Each such original and copy. ANSWER: Edwards and Cassell have not personally seen such a photograph or video. Discovery efforts to obtain photographic materials regarding Jane Doe No. 3 held by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida and/or other federal law enforcement and prosecuting agencies are on-going. 15. For Each communication between You or anyone acting on Your behalf, and anyone from, or acting on behalf of, any media outlet Concerning this action, the Joinder Motion, or Dershowitz, and regardless of whether such communication was “on the record” or “off the record,” (a) state the date of the communication; (b) state the participants in the communication; and (c) describe the contents of the communication. ANSWER: Objection, not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; vague, harassing, work-product. 16. Describe in detail All facts Concerning any assertion that Dershowitz was a “coconspirator” with Epstein. ANSWER: See answers to interrogatory number 5 above, as well as answers to interrogatories numbers 1, 6, 8, 9, 10 above. In addition, factual information is found in the documents and other materials and references provided in answer to Request for Production Number 2 15 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015545

PAUL G. CASSELL stATEOF [ITAL ) COUNTYOF /jye ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this || day of Warn Aes 2015 by % 2 who is personally known to me (type of identification) as or who has produced PF Seng identification and wh6 did/did not take an oath. > e Notary Public State of Florida at Large Stake oX Uskeches ONE My Commission expires: Commission No: Notary Public SUSAN BACA Commission #668649 My Commission Exples April 19, 2017 we tote of Utah "ee SS NS Sm REM mies L—_.._ HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015546

Bradley J. Edwards STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF Waa d ) BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, personally appeared this day Bradley J. Edwards, who is personally known to me or ([_] _ produced , aS identification, and who, after being duly sworn, did state that he/she executed the foregoing Answers to First Set of Interrogatories and that the same are true and correct to the best of his knowledge ink Subscribed and sworn to before me this fo day of 2015. Th MY COMMISSION #6840478 / EXPIRES: OCT 03, 2016 Bondad through Ist Stata ineurance Print / Typed Name, Notary Public My commission expires: 10 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015547

EXHIBIT I HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015548

20 al 22 23 24 25 N THE CIRCUIT COURT OF TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN BROWARD COUNTY, F CASE NO. CACE 15-0 BRADLEY J. iDWARDS and PAUL G. CAS E Plaintiffs/Counterclai VS. ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, Defendant/Counterclaim KE SEVENTEENTH AND FOR LORIDA 00072 SELL, m Defendants, Plaintif VIDEOTAPED DEPOSIT PAUL G. CASSEL TAKEN ON BEHALF OF THE DEFENDANT VOLUME I, PAGES ] to 15] Friday, October 16 1:33 p.m. - 4:31 , 2015 p.m. 110 Southeast 6th 110 Tower - Suite Fort Lauderdale, Flori Theresa Tomaselli, Street 1850 da 33301 RMR ESQUIRE soLUTtIONS HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015549

m= Wd N Oo wa DD OO 10 11 Te 13 14 la 16 17 18 19 20 21 2d 23 24 ool let me clear all of that misunderstanding up. You know, that's -- frankly, if I had gotten something like that, that's what I would have said. The answer that came back was -- from Mr. Dershowitz was something along the lines of, if I remember correctly, well, tell me what you -- you -- tell me what you want to know and I'll decide whether to cooperate, was I think the phrase that was used. And -- and so there was an attempt, you know, a 2009 attempt, a 2011 attempt to get information from Mr. Dershowitz. Then there was another subpoena without deposition for -- for documents. You know, we have heard a lot about records in this case that could prove innocence. There was a records request to Mr. Dershowitz in 2013. And, again, my understanding was that there was no -- you know, no documents were provided on that. And so those -- I had that information. Another bit of information that I had was that in 2011, I believe in early April -- this is not attorney/client privileged information from Virginia Roberts. This is a telephone call that she placed from Australia where she had been DESQUIRE HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015550

EXHIBIT J HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015551

JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, VS. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and L.M., individually, Defendants. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG NOTICE OF FILING COMES NOW the Defendant/CounterClaimant, BRADLEY EDWARDS, by and through his undersigned counsel, and hereby files the attached transcript of the telephone interview of Virginia Roberts to supplement the proffer made in support of Counter-Claimant’s Motion for Leave to Amend to Assert Punitive Damages. I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list on this [7 day of May 2011. Jack Scarola Florida Bar No.: 169440 Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Phone: (561) 686-6300 Fax: (561) 383-9451 Attorney for Defendant/CounterClaimant Edwards HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015552

Edwards adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Notice of Filing Supplement COUNSEL LIST Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire Martin Weinberg, Esquire [email protected]; Martin Weinberg, P.C. [email protected] 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. Suffolk, MA 02116 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, PL 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-524-2820 Fax: (954)-524-2822 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr., Esquire [email protected] Fowler White Burnett, P.A. 901 Phillips Point West 777 S Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, FL 33401-6170 Phone: (561)-802-9044 Fax: (561)-802-9976 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein Marc S. Nurik [email protected] Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-745-5849 Fax: (954)-745-3556 Attorneys for Scott Rothstein HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015553

Edwards adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Notice of Filing Supplement HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015554

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015555

PRIVILEGED PURSUANT TO FS 766.205(4) and/or WORK PRODUCT TELECON PARTICIPANTS: JACK SCAROLA BRAD EDWARDS VIRGINIA ROBERTS RE: Edwards adv. Epstein 291874 DATE: April 07, 2011 JS: Virginia, Jack Scarola and Brad Edwards BE: Hi Virginia. V: Hi Jack! Hi Brad! How you guys doing? JS: | We’re doing fine, thank you. I’m sorry for all of the trouble and before we go any further, let me tell you, if I have your permission, I have started a tape recorder and I want to be able to tape this conversation from the very beginning. Is that alright with you? V: Sure, that’s fine, Jack. No problem JS: | Ok, good, thank you. I appreciate that. Let me start off by introducing myself. I know that Brad has spoken to you about me but I am Brad’s lawyer, and I assume that you can confirm that you and I have never had any communication before. Is that right? V: That’s correct. JS: Alright. I have, however, gotten some information from Brad about conversations that you have had with him, and that will enable me, hopefully, to make this a little bit more efficient and take up a minimum amount of your time while still getting the information that we think is going to be helpful to us and to any jury that might ultimately have to hear these facts. So, let me begin by asking you first to tell us what your full name is. V: Virginia Louise Roberts. That’s my maiden name. My married name is Virginia Louise * HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015556

Edwards adv. Epstein Telephone interview with Virginia Roberts Page 2 of 23 JS: | Could you spell your last name for us? That is your married last name: \ Ee eee" JS: Alright, thank you, and where are you living right now? V: I live in Australia. JS: | And how long have you resided in Australia. V: This is my 19" year. JS: That is where you are right now, correct? We’ve reached you in Australia for this phone conversation? V: That is correct, yes. JS: | And what time is it in Australia right now? V: I think it’s about 9:00 now. JS: Ok. That’s 9am, correct? V: That’s correct. JS: Alright. Virginia, the reason for this conversation is because it is our understanding that you know a man by the name Jeffrey Epstein, and I want to begin by asking you please to tell us about the circumstances of your first meeting Mr. Epstein. V: Ok. I was introduced to Mr. Epstein by Ghislaine Maxwell. I was working at Donald Trump’s spa in Mar-a-Lago and I was prompted by Ghislaine to come to Jeffrey’s mansion in Palm Beach that afternoon after work to make some extra money and to learn about massage. She met me at the spa, and I was reading a book about anatomy, so I was already interested in massage therapy as it was and not having any of the education or you know anything behind me, I thought this was a great opportunity to work for her and go. So, I went to Jeffrey’s mansion about 5 or 6 in the afternoon. My dad drove me there. My dad worked at Mar-a-Lago with me, and he met Ghislaine and she seemed like a nice, proper English lady, and she knows, I mean, you know, one time then _once before I left to travel overseas, she just seemed really nice and like she would like to help me out. So my dad left, and I had no problem getting home that night, one of her drivers would take me back after my trial. So she led me upstairs, and into Jeffrey’s bedroom, and past that is Jeffrey’s massage room, which has got his steam room and a shower and a massage table, and there is actually an extra room that has, that nobody knows about it, it’s kinda like a secret room and it’s got a whole bunch of decorative pictures of pornographic literature and sex toys andIcan___? _ what happened in there. HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015557

Edwards adv. Epstein Telephone interview with Virginia Roberts Page 3 of 23 JS: JS: JS: JS: When you say that the room was hidden, Virginia, how was the room concealed? It wasn’t like a door that you would normally go into, like some kind of special opening, you open that and then a little door, so it looks like it’s a little closet so-to-speak, but when you walk in there, it’s obviously a lot bigger than just a closet. It wasn’t too big, but it was bigger, you know. It wasn’t a gigantic room, it was just like a small room, which you know, it probably could fit some shoes in there, it had racks of shoes, boxes, some sweatshirts neatly folded, and the ceiling to the floor was covered in pornographic pictures of the girls that he had met. When you say... So anyways, that was getting there, and I was introduced to Jeffrey, he was laying naked on top of the massage table, and obviously for one, I’m a 15 year old girl and seeing him on the table was weird but, also learning about anatomy and massage, I thought this would be part of it. So obviously, I thought it was part of the massage program, so I said ok, this is fine. And, he then instructed me on how to touch the body, Jeffrey’s body, how to massage him, and for the first hour, it was actually a real massage, maybe not an hour, maybe like 40 minutes or something, but of something like that _and that’s when he turned over on the other side and to expose himself fully. So then Ghislaine told me that she wanted me to undress and began to take off my shirt and skirt, my white uniform from Mar-A-Lago, she also took off her shirt and got undressed, and so I was there with just my undies on, and she was completely bare, and made some kind of little flake about the underwear that I was wearing because it wasn’t my normal sexy girl underwear and just like, I don’t know, had red hearts on it or something like that; just your normal, you know, real cute underwear. Anyways, so during all of this I’m kind of like what’s going on, how do I act, what do I say, I was so afraid of, not afraid or fearful for my life but _unsure of how all this started and wanting to obtain a profession_ I was so aftaid thinking about upsetting and disappointing them, I don’t know, it’s a weird situation by far and I was expected to Lick his nipples, instructed on how to do so by J.E_ and give him oral sex while he wanted to fondle me, and then at the end, I was told by Ghislaine to get on top and straddle Jeffrey sexually, and when we were done, we went and had a shower in the room and Jeffrey told me to wash him up and down, you know with a bar of soap and make sure he was all cleaned up. And then he took me downstairs and took me to two of the guards and told John to bring me home. John was the butler at the time. Let me interrupt you for just a moment there if I could, Virginia. You mentioned as you were recounting those details that you were 15 years old at the time. What is your date of birth? August 9", 1983 And can you tell us please, as best you’re able to estimate it, what the date was when this first encounter occurred? HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015558

Edwards adv. Epstein Telephone interview with Virginia Roberts Page 4 of 23 V: I’ve got it written down. It’s like - I’m not good with math — hold on —I thought I wrote it down but I didn’t. I’m not too sure, J think it was 1998 off the top of my head and around June of 1998, I would say as I was turning 16 at the end of the summer. JS: Alright. You talked about the room where Jeffrey had the pornographic photographs. Did you actually see that room on the occasion of your first visit there? V: No, I got to see that room a few visits after but I was just trying to describe that room to you guys so you knew exactly what room I was talking about. JS: | Another question for you, and I don’t mean to be prying into your personal life, and if I ask you any questions at all that you’re uncomfortable answering, then you just tell me that and we’ll move on, because I appreciate your cooperation and the last I thing I want to do is impose upon that cooperation, but can you tell us please just generally what kind of sexual experience you had had prior to this confrontation with Jeffrey? V: Yeah, sure. A close family friend has sexually abused me, and I was on the streets at 13 years old. I was picked up by a 67 year old man named Ron _Eppinger_ who did exactly what Jeffrey did with me abuse and violate my youthfulness _ & I was with him for 6 months. So, he was gone and then I had this boyfriend who was like my school friend from young days but we just kept in contact with each other and we were on and off constantly, and that was Tony Figeroua_, and there was also another younger guy was near my age, Michael, I can’t remember his last name, but yeah, there, I mean, there wasn’t like a string of men or anything, but there was Ron, like I told you, and he was the first guy expecting me to do so-called disgusting affairs. Jeffrey actually knew Ron, which was quite weird when I told Jeffrey the story about Ron, and Jeffrey had actually met him, and yeah. Anyway, just another story, and yeah, there were a couple of men, but that gives you an idea. JS: | Now when you described the photographs in the room as pornographic, tell me just a little bit about the photographs, if you would please? First, how many of them were there? V: At least 100, and like I said, they covered the room from the ceiling, not the ceiling but from the top of the edge of the wall to the bottom of the floor. I want to say at least a hundred, even more, there could have been more in the boxes Some of them were A4_ photographs, like the large size, some of naked women posing, you know, positions, sexy positions. Others were, you know, some girls had bikinis on, and it wasn’t so pornographic, but it was all women, and it was all in a sexual nature. JS: | Were there photographs where more than one person appeared? V: Oh yeah, plenty of them. There were lots of naked photographs, I mean I was just trying to give you a visual range. There was anything from 5x6s to 4x8s to 8x4s. Some of them HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015559

Edwards adv. Epstein Telephone interview with Virginia Roberts Page 5 of 23 had frames, some of them were out of frames, but they were all, like I said, they were all women, they were all sexual in nature. JS: | Was it your impression that there were a hundred photos of a hundred different people or were there multiple photos of the same woman or girl? V: There was definitely a lot of different girls. I mean it wasn’t easy to sit there and say, you weren’t finding 5 girls out of some photos, no. Were there a hundred different ones? There could have been pictures of some girls, I really couldn’t get close necessarily to actually recognize faces or anything like that. But if you, you know, the range of them were all different, majority of them were different, yeah. JS: Did there ever come a point in time when you became aware that a photograph of you had been added to the collection? V: Yes, there was. Ghislaine took several nude photographs of me for Jeffrey. So, yeah, there were pictures of me and there were pictures, he wasn’t shy, that wasn’t the only place in his house that he kept the photos. He liked photos all over his house. If you looked in his den or on his desk or in on the hall table, a giant hall table in his house, there were at least a hundred photos of girls in frames. Not all of them were naked, a lot of the ones that were all around his house were not naked girls posing pornographically, some were pictures of celebrities and politicians he had known_or things like that or had pants on or whatever, but yeah, there was a lot of mixed photographs in the outside ones. JS: | Were there any photographs of girls or young women that you knew or that you subsequently came to know that you saw in the house? V: Yeah, yeah, there was. There was pictures of Nadia Bjournik ,» pictures Sarah Keller, pictures Emmy, pictures of me, pictures of the regulars, but a lot of the girls, sometimes Jeffrey could have like 7 girls a day, and he would only see those girls once if he got bored. I don’t know. These weren’t my days. I heard he’s gotten a lot sloppier since I left. So, I don’t know anyways, but when I knew him, there was just a, it seemed, there was such an influx of girls coming in and out, so did I recognize a lot of them? Maybe, maybe not, but then they were all definitely beautiful, they were all ranging in age, some of them young, some of them older in their 20’s, I mean it was just they were all beautiful. JS: | You’ve told us about the first visit. Was there any discussion on the occasion of that first visit about your returning? V: Yes, they were very pleased with me and after the encounter was finished, the sexual encounter, he went and told me I did well and J have a lot of potential to become a massage therapist and if I’d like I could return tomorrow, you know, and do the same thing and get paid $200/hr, so Jeffrey insisted that I come after work, and over the next few days, I guess the relationship grew into more, and within a couple of weeks, not even HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015560

Edwards adv. Epstein Telephone interview with Virginia Roberts Page 6 of 23 a couple of weeks, maybe a week, I had quit Mar-a-Lago and I was working for Jeffrey full time. JS: Ok, let’s talk about your job at Mar-a-Lago, if we could. You said that your Dad was working there. What was his position at Mar-a-~-Lago? V: He was a maintenance supervisor I think is what it was called? He like managed the tennis courts and air conditioners and things like that. JS: | What is your Dad’s full name? V: Sky William Roberts. JS: — And is he still living here in South Florida now? V: No, he’s not, he’s in California. JS: Ok. Is your Dad aware of what is currently going on with regard to your having made public statements about your relationship with Jeffrey? V: Yes, he is well aware of it. I told my family even before all this stuff came out, because they were the first ones contacted by the journalists from Mail on Sunday. I know that they the Mail on Sunday printed that I had gone out and tried to, I mean I think one of the photos said that I was angry that I saw Jeffrey and the Prince walking together and that is why I came out and went public with everything. Not true. I mean, I am angry about how they are still up to their old ways together and that they’re still hanging out but I didn’t contact the Mail on Sunday and I didn’t bring it out. I figured that everyone was going to bring it out anyway and I better bring it out the right way. He’s known everything from the start, and my family is very supportive with everything going on. JS: I’mkind of going to jump around a little bit and I apologize for that, but since the subject has come up, tell me first of all why you are providing this cooperation to us, and I am certainly very appreciative of it, but I want you to tell us why it is you’ve chosen to spend time with us on the telephone and provide this information that you’re now providing. V: I’m out to help the bigger picture, you know, I think all of us can make a big difference in a lot of other people’s lives and I think that this has gone on long enough and it’s a big slap in my face that he can get away with hurting me so bad let alone so many other girls and laugh about it. I guess I talked to you guys out because I want to see the right thing happen, not just to him, but I want people in the world to understand this is not the way of life, you know, it’s not acceptable to go out procure young girls and make them think that, this is the way you should be living and that’s all. Yeah, I guess my reason for doing it is to help the bigger picture, you know, I’m a big believer in karma and I believe that good things will come back to you, so I guess that’s why I’m doing this. HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015561

Edwards adv. Epstein Telephone interview with Virginia Roberts Page 7 of 23 JS: Just for the record, neither Brad, nor I, nor anyone representing that they have anything to do with us has made any promises to you. Is that correct? V: That is correct. I’ll tell you, since this is our first conversation, that nobody has made me feel like I’ve been bribed or bought or had to say anything. I’ve told you anything that I know from my own self, not some things somebody told me. If anything, Brad’s been extra careful not to tell me anything and let me do all the talking, so it’s quite opposite I think. JS: Alright. Let’s get back then to the story of your relationship with Jeffrey, and we’ve talked about your first encounter with him and how it evolved from that into your full time employment with Jeffrey, but what were you doing at Mar-a-Lago before you quit Mar-a-Lago? V: I was just a locker room attendant and sometimes I did babysitting for the rich and famous. So, I wasn’t anything big. I worked in the spa area. That’s why I was studying anatomy, because I was really really interested in becoming a_massage therapist_, and at the locker room, I didn’t do much. I mean I was making tea for a living, I would, you know, make sure the toilet paper had a little triangle in it after everybody went to the toilet, or wipe down the water from the basin, you know, it was a very easy peasy job. JS: Did you get that job through your Dad? V: Yes, my Dad got me the job. JS: Ok, and you were only 15 years old at the time, were they aware of how old you were at Mar-a-Lago? V: Of course, definitely. We had to go through extensive, you know, we even had to get drug tested and id test and so on and so forth. I mean, Mantas (?) is very strict on employment, yeah, everybody knew. JS: | Ok. Was there ever any conversation with Ghislaine about how old you were before you were taken to Jeffrey’s mansion? V: No. She didn’t ask me how old I was from the start, but when I did get to Jeffrey’s mansion, it was discussed how old I was. JS: With whom? V: During the entire hour of what I call the legitimate massage I was giving him, it was cat and mouse games getting information from me to find out who I am, am J a willing participant in these kind of things, and how would I react if they were about to take the next step. But they got information off of me, they got my age, they got my, a little bit of my history so they knew I was, you know, not very stable at home, and they knew that, HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015562

Edwards adv. Epstein Telephone interview with Virginia Roberts Page 8 of 23 you know, I was actually interested in making my life better by studying so what they were offering me was a chance to become a legitimate masseuse but it was getting trained. They would have people show me how to work the body and be called a massage therapist and get me books on it, and you know, keep me interested, and every time, you know, I was with Jeffrey, literally was about massages, I don’t mean just going in and have sex with him. I mean massage, because it would always start out with massage and then it would lead into sometimes other things. JS: Alright, once this evolved. into full time employment, what did full time employment mean? V: That was entirely having to travel with Jeffrey in every city. When he was in Palm Beach, I stayed at my apartment, and he would call me to his house once or twice a day sometimes, and that’s, you know, do things with him. Sometimes we’d go out shopping, sometimes we’d go out and watch a movie. You know, simple things like that, go to an expo or a fair, whatever it was. But when we were in other cities, I was at my apartment_, I lived with him full time. What I mean by full time is even in the middle of the night, I could get a ring on my phone next to me and tell me to come in his room, you know, so it was literally full time. JS: | When you say that when you were in Palm Beach you were living in your apartment, were you living on your own or were you living with members of your family at that time? V: No, after I quit Mar-a-Lago, Jeffrey offered to get me an apartment in Palm Beach somewhere, Royal Palm Beach, and it was a nice apartment. He furnished it for me, it was absolutely beautiful, but yeah, that’s the only time I would spend time away from him really. JS: This apartment was on Royal Palm Beach Boulevard or out in the Village of Royal Palm Beach? V: I so honestly don’t remember. I’ve been trying to rack my brain because the FBI was asking the same thing and were trying to find it, but yeah, [’m Not sur_. I didn’t get to spend as much time in it, I was only there about an entire week out of every month probably, but the majority of the time I was with Jeffrey anyways. It was somewhere in Royal Palm Beach. I don’t know about Royal Palm Beach drive. I don’t even remember the Royal Palm Beach drive anymore so I’m not too sure. JS: Ok, let me see if I can draw the distinction for you and maybe that will help you to help us? Royal Palm Beach is a village that is... Vi No, no, no, I got Royal Palm Beach, I just didn’t know the Royal Palm Beach Drive, like what street it’s off of. Were you talking about a street? HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015563

Edwards adv. Epstein Telephone interview with Virginia Roberts Page 9 of 23 JS: Yes, I was talking about a street. Royal Palm Drive is on the island of Palm Beach, and it’s a street that is lined with large royal palm trees, and I’m wondering if this was an apartment on the island or was this an apartment out west of town... V: No, it was actually in Royal Palm Beach, not on the island. JS: — Alright. V: I would be driven, it was closer to my family than it was closer to him. I wanted to be close enough to everybody else so that when I was in town, I could just go see them quickly. JS: Ok. So we’re not talking about Royal Palm Boulevard. We’re talking about the town of Royal Palm west of town. Jeffrey got you an apartment out there. V: That’s correct. JS: | When he was in Palm Beach, you were generally not staying at the mansion, you were staying at the apartment that he got for you out west of town. V: That’s correct. JS: Ok. V: I mean then there was times, I don’t wanna say that every time I stayed at my apartment. There was times we’d fly back from some city maybe too late at night to really want to go back home, so you know, it’s like 12:00 at night or 1:00 in the morning. I was just staying in the yellow room, or something like that; one of the guest rooms in Palm Beach. But majority of the time, I would definitely want to get back to my own apartment. JS: Alright. What were the general hours of your full time employment when ...? V: There was not set hours. It wasn’t like logging, and you know, hitting the shift button, nothing like that. The way I would get paid would be, ok, if J was in Palm Beach, I would get $200 an hour to massage Jeffrey or some of his friends and then go home. So it would be like that. If I was traveling with him, it would be per massage, so I would be getting paid per day. So I wouldn’t be getting paid on an hourly rate. He wouldn’t say ok, today you’re going to work for me from 7:00 in the morning until 8:00 at night. It never like that. I was on call all the time. JS: | When you were here in Palm Beach, were you actually getting paid only for the time spent massaging Jeffrey or were you getting paid from your arrival at his house until you left the house? V: From the time the massage started. HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015564

Edwards adv. Epstein Telephone interview with Virginia Roberts Page 10 of 23 JS: From the time the massage started. Ok. V: Sometimes we'd go there and I would wait for a while or talk with Ghislaine and Jeffrey about something or we’d meet somewhere and talk about something. A lot of times, I’d meet him upstairs in his room where he was ready for me. But then there was a lot of times where it didn’t start right away, so he couldn’t really pay me from the time I got there sometimes unless it was just paid from the time I massaged him til the time the massage was over. JS: Alright. Did your duties for Jeffrey ever include anything other than providing him massages and sex in connection with the massages? Did he ever give you any other responsibilities to perform? V: I was asked to do the same things that I did to Jeffrey to a few of his fellow colleagues as well. Those were my duties. He looked at it this way is that I was going to be a professional massage therapist, and maybe I needed some clientele, so he had me perform erotic massages on a few people. JS: Did that start here in Palm Beach County? V: It did. The first one did. JS: Ok, and how long after you first met Jeffrey did he first ask you to provide services for one of his friends? V: About 9 months, I think it was. It wasn’t a full year, it wasn’t 6 months, but between 6 months and a year, which is why I’m saying 9 months. JS: | And when you provided services to a friend of Jeffrey’s, who paid you for those services? V: Jeffrey would. I would get paid the next time I saw Jeffrey, so if I was invited to the Breakers Hotel to give a massage, I would give a massage, I would go home, and the next day when I saw Jeffrey, he would pay me for what I did. So, it was paid always by him, it was set up by him, so he always knew what to pay me. I did get tips and things like that, if you call it that, you know, like a hundred dollar tip or something from a few of them, you know, yeah. JS: Was there .. V: There was always payment from Jeffrey. JS: Was there ever any discussion with Jeffrey about what was expected to happen when you provided massage services to one of Jeffrey’s friends? HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015565

Edwards adv. Epstein Telephone interview with Virginia Roberts Page 11 of 23 V: In a roundabout way, yes. In so many ways, Jeffrey really really had to train me, and that was why Ghislaine said that she and Jeffrey enjoyed me so much was because they never really had to speak much to me to tell me what they wanted me to do. You know, I wasn’t waiting for you know, their directions. Jeffrey would tell me to go give an erotic massage to friends. He wouldn’t give me much detail about it, but he would say to treat them like you treat me. JS: Did he refer to it as an erotic massage or are those your words? V: Erotic massage is my words. That’s exactly what it was, but he would tell me to treat them how he wanted it, so I'd do what he wanted without having to say to me words more. I mean, I complied with what he wanted because it was somewhat of a, I don’t know, I don’t know how to say it, it was just very mindboggling how I let him have so much control or power over me basically. The massages would be routine to what Jeffrey wanted with my so called new clientele, and with their own words would ask me to provide them with sexual pleasure after the massage. JS: Did you ever report back to Jeffrey about what happened when you provided massages to his friends? V: Of course, of course, and I knew that his friends were reporting back to him as well because there were times where he would instigate conversation by saying you know, so and so had a great time, you did wonderful, you know so and so gave me a call and told J.E how it went_... JS: Did Jeffrey ever elicit details from you? “Tell me what happened, describe in detail what went on?” V: No, but he would have a laugh, he had a laugh with me a few times about some of their different mannerisms, I guess you would say, like some of them, one guy had a foot fetish and that was really weird and I mentioned it to Jeffrey, and we would have a laugh over it. He didn’t want to know details. He wasn’t asking me “so tell me what did you guys do exactly.” No, he just basically gave me a slap on the back and said, you know, good job. And we had some kind of conversation about it. I can’t recall any conversation off the top of my head. I really don’t know one. It’s been that long. But yeah, we did talk about it briefly. JS: Can you give me an estimate as to the number of friends for whom Jeffrey provided and paid for your services? V: There was about, you know, I don’t know, 8 guys possibly. JS: | And are you able to name those people for me? HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015566

Edwards adv. Epstein Telephone interview with Virginia Roberts Page 12 of 23 V: No, not at this stage. I just, some of these people are really influential in power, and I don’t want to start another shitstorm with a few of them. I’ll tell you that there was some erotic massages given to, I’m just afraid to say it to you. JS: Ok, Virginia. Ve It’s like geez, I don’t know if I want to, I’m really scared of where this is gonna go. JS: Alright. I understand that, and as I told you from the beginning, if I ask you a question that you are uncomfortable answering, you just tell me that, and I will move on, and I understand that at least right now, you are uncomfortable answering, and I am certainly going to respect that. V: Thank you so much, Jack. JS: No, that’s quite alright. I am very appreciate of the cooperation you are providing, and I don’t want you at any time to feel that we are taking unfair advantage of that cooperation, so give me the information that you’re comfortable giving me, and if we get to a point where you’re uncomfortable, I will respect that and we’ll move on from there. V: Ok. JS: I want to talk a little bit about the traveling that you did with Jeffrey. About how long into your relationship with him did that first start? V: Immediately. I started traveling immediately. Not internationally until I think about, Gosh, I can’t remember even, I think it was a year later that we started doing international travel. Maybe like 9 months to a year again. Not too sure to be honest. JS: So that would have been approximately the summer of 1999? Somewhere around there? V: Yes. Somewhere around there. Somewhere around a year, somewhere around there, I can’t pinpoint it exactly. But like I said, we started doing domestic traveling immediately, so my first destination with him was New York and Santa Fe and the Carribean, California, I would take trips with him occasionally. Sometimes we would go to St. Louis or New Orleans or Santa Cruz. We were traveling just about everywhere [ think, JS: How did you travel? V: Well, we took Jeffrey’s private jet, and unless I was being sent somewhere by myself for what we were just talking about before, then I would travel on a what do you call, a public jet, whatever it is... JS: commercial flight? HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015567

Edwards adv. Epstein Telephone interview with Virginia Roberts Page 13 of 23 V: Yes. Just a normal flight, an e-ticket. JS: Like the rest of us common folk. V: But when I was traveling with Jeffrey, the majority of the time would be on the black jet. JS: | Now, when you say there would be times when you would travel by yourself because he was sending you somewhere, tell me about that. How did that come about? V: So, one of his colleagues would be at the Carribean or Santa Fe or even New York, or wherever, and he would call me up on those days where I am not working with him or in Palm Beach with him, and he would ask me to get on the next plane to so and so and go meet so and so, and that’s when I would take e-tickets. His secretary or special assistant, whatever, would organize it for me and give me the details and I would just walk up the line and they’d let me right through. JS: Can you give me any ideas as to how many times it happened that Jeffrey would send you off to meet some friend of his at some location outside of Palm Beach? V: How many times it happened? I’m not too sure. Probably about 10-15 times. JS: | Ok. And on those occasions, how much time would you spend with one of Jeffrey’s friends when you were sent to a location that you would have to travel to? V: Only a couple of days. Only 2 days, that’s it. JS: And how were you paid for those trips? V: I would be paid in cash upon my arrival back with Jeffrey. So, whenever I was back with Jeffrey, he would count up how many days I’ve had, sometimes give me even more than what I deserved, not deserved, but what I earned and give me a little extra. JS: Was there a daily rate for those trips or was that per massage also? V: Per massage. With Jeffrey, I would be honest. I wouldn’t tell him I did 15 massages if I didn’t. He knew he could trust me. He could always come back to the other person that he sent me to give massages and ask them as well, so you know, it was always by per massage. JS: Alright. When we’ve been talking about massages, tell me exactly what it is we’re talking about when we speak about massages. V: Same thing I would do to Jeffrey. Again, it would start out as a massage, which would start with them being naked, and me giving him a legitimate massage to begin with, so HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015568

Edwards adv. Epstein Telephone interview with Virginia Roberts Page 14 of 23 I’d start with his feet, go up to his calves, up his legs, buttocks, back, his neck, his head, his arms, yada yada, and then it would be time to flip over, and some of the men would want me to continue on massaging the front side of them and they would instigate me to begin having sex with them or foreplay, whatever you want to call it. JS: So routinely, these massages involved sexual activity. Is that accurate? V: That is accurate. JS: Ok. Let’s talk about the travel that you were involved in when you were on Jeffrey’s private plane. Generally speaking, who were the passengers on the plane when you traveled. V: Well, Larry was the pilot, and then there was a short, small solid guy, I don’t know his name, but he was a co-pilot, and then he changed and there was another guy brought in later on. Generally speaking, there was always Jeffrey, sometimes Ghislaine, sometimes Emmy, sometimes a whole bunch of other girls, sometimes famous people, sometimes some politicians or yeah, just about anybody could fly on his plane. There was never no any set routine who would come and who would go. It was an influx of people on Jeffrey’s airplane. JS: I want to deal with these things separately in order to respect some of the reservations that you have, so I’m going to ask you who the people were that you remember flying with Jeffrey on his plane when you were personally present without regard to whether there was any sexual activity that occurred on the plane or not. So I’m not asking you to implicate any of these famous people in improper conduct, but just tell me what the names of the people are that you remember that you consider to be famous people. V: Ok, there was Naomi Campbell, Heidi Klum, there was Bill Clinton. There was Al (?) Gore, there was a whole bunch of models, I wouldn’t really honestly be able to give their names. There was Matt Groning the producer of the simpons cartoon, Jack CCousteau’s granddaughter a lot of interior designers, architects, politicians. I am just trying to think of as many names as possible for you. Off the top of my head, that’s as good as I can get for now. JS: Ok, alright, that’s fine. And again, I am not implying by my questions, nor do I want your answers to be interpreted as your suggesting that any of those people that you have just identified were engaged in any improper activities on any particular flight, but I want to talk to you now about what went on on occasion on the airplane. Ok? V: Ok. It was a lot of the same thing that went down on the ground. A lot of times, it would be just be me and Jeffrey, or me and Jeffrey and Ghislaine, or me and Jeffrey and some other girl, sometimes Emmy, Sarah, and Nadia Bjournik. There would be sexual conduct, there would be foreplay, there was a bed in there, so we could basically reenact exactly HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015569

Edwards adv. Epstein Telephone interview with Virginia Roberts Page 15 of 23 what was happening in the house. It would start off with massaging or we would start off with foreplay, sometimes it would lead to, you know, orgies. JS: Were there occasions when you were in Jeffrey’s company, whether on the ground or in the air, where there were other girls present whom you knew to be under age 18? V: Yes. There was a constant influx of girls coming in and going out. And we were all very young. On occasion, there was some older girls, and I don’t mean older as in like in their 30s or anything, I mean like 28, 29, something like that, just very rarely. The majority of the girls that Jeffrey actually met or had on his plane or in his house were under age. JS: Do you know how it is that Jeffrey established with any of these underage girls? V: Yes, Ido. He would send me personally or with other girls to clubs or shops, to _pick up anywhere, J mean we were constantly on the look for other girls that might satisfy Jeffrey. JS: | What instructions were you given about what to look for? V: Young, pretty, you know, a fun personality. They couldn’t be black. If they were any other descent other than white, they had to be exotically beautiful. That was just about it. JS: | Who gave you those criteria? V: They both gave us the instructions, and it wasn’t just me, Jeffrey asked most girls to bring a friend and make extra money. They would use us young girls So that way it probably looked a lot more safer to a girl that we were procuring to younger girls that were already doing it. That was the way that Jeffrey had it. JS: Were you given any instruction at all on how to approach these girls? V: Yes. Jeffrey and Ghislaine both taught me to, depending on the circumstances, depending on the girl, you could offer them a job as a massage therapist or you could tell them you have a really rich friend with, you know, great contacts in the acting world or modeling world and he loves pretty girls, you should come back and meet him, make some money, you know, we had a whole bunch of ways to be able to procure girls. JS: Can you give me any idea as to the total number of underage girls that you know engaged in sexual conduct with Jeffrey during the period of time you had your relationship with him? V: I would have no way of estimating that whatsoever. I mean, there could be a hundred, there could be more, honestly I’m not too sure how many girls, really. I wish I did know. I mean like I said there were so many over the course of 4 years with Jeffrey. HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015570

Edwards adv. Epstein Telephone interview with Virginia Roberts Page 16 of 23 JS: Let me see if we can try to narrow it down a little bit. Is there any doubt in your mind that it was more than 10? V: Yes, there was definitely more than 10. JS: Ok, what I want you to do is to give me the highest number that you are comfortable in saying there were definitely more than X number of underage girls that I know Jeffrey Epstein engaged in sex with while I had a relationship with him. How would you fill in that blank? Definitely more than how many? V: I'd say definitely more than a hundred. JS: Alright. Did Jeffrey ever help to pick out your clothes? V: Oh yes. I mean he wasn’t out to dress me like a porn star or anything. He would always dress me very classy, but we'd just go shopping all the time together. JS: Did he ever express any style preferences in terms of how he wanted you to dress? Besides dressing classy, I’m, you know, any other suggestion to you about how he wanted you dressed? V: He didn’t, like I said, wasn’t trying to dress me in any prostitute way or anything like that. It was nice, classy outfits I was wearing like Gucci, Dolce Gabbana, Chanel, things like that. He was buying me a lot of very, very nice clothing. It was provocative. I mean I was wearing miniskirts, and tight short shorts and little shirts that showed my belly and my cleavage and everything, but they were very expensive clothes. JS: | Was there every any dress up role playing? Vv: Yes. There was. Lots of it. Jeffrey loved the latex outfits Ghislane had for us girls, he had bondage outfits, he had all different kinds of outfits, but his favorite was the schoolgirl. JS: Tell me about that. V: Well, you know, Ghislaine would take me to dress me up to surprise J.E or Jeffrey would ask me to get dressed up, that would include wearing a tiny little skirt with nothing underneath, a white collared shirt that you would be wearing to school with a tie in it, tied up _in a bow_, my hair in pigtails, stockings on up to my knees, and I would go in there and act like a kid and we’d do role playing sexing. JS: Did Jeffrey ever brag to you about the age of any of the girls with whom he had relationships? HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015571

Edwards adv. Epstein Telephone interview with Virginia Roberts Page 17 of 23 V: Yes, he did. He did all the time. The worst one that I heard from his own mouth was this pretty 12 year old girls he had flown in for his birthday. It was a surprise birthday gift from one of his friends and they were from France. I did see them, I did meet them. Jeffrey bragged afterwards after he met them that they were 12 year olds and flown over from France because they’re really poor over there, and their parents needed the money or whatever the case is and they were absolutely free to stay and flew out. Those were the worst ones. He was constantly bragging about girls’ ages or where he got them from or their past and how terrible their past was and good he is making it for them. JS: Where were the 12 year old girls flown to from France? Where did they come to? V: Palm Beach. JS: | And were they flown in on Jeff's private plane or did they get transported? V: No. They were transported by somebody else. JS: | Ok. Was the sexual activity that went on on the airplane conducted in such a way so that any of the crew was aware of what was going on? V: They were told to knock if they had to come out, if the crew had to come out. They were told, you know, to come out as little as possible, so they weren’t out there hanging out watching everything, no, but it doesn’t take an idiot to put two and two together to say well there’s a whole bunch of half dressed teenagers on board with this old man who is constantly being massaged by them and he wants me to keep the door shut for what reason? I mean, only they could put that together, but yeah, they knew. JS: | Did Mr. Epstein ever talk to you about people of power and influence owing him favors? V: He would laugh about it, you know, I never really knew what to take serious from Jeffrey because he was such a funny character at times. You never knew if what he was saying was true or not. Yeah, lots of people owed him favors from what he told me. He’s got everybody in his pocket, and he would laugh about he helps people for the sole purpose in the end they owe him something. That’s why I believe he does so many favors in the first place. JS: | When and how did you first become aware that Mr. Epstein was in trouble with the law? V: I was first informed by, I think someone from the FBI called me first and started to ask me questions, and J started to answer the questions but then fear took over, and I just said look, I don’t know what’s going on, I’ve got a young family that I don’t want to risk, you know, please don’t bother me about this again, and it was real short simple conversation, and within a week or 2, I had gotten a call from Jeffrey’s attorney, and then a week later, Jeffrey himself. HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015572

Edwards adv. Epstein Telephone interview with Virginia Roberts Page 18 of 23 JS: Vv: JS: V: JS: V: JS: V: JS: V: JS: V: JS: JS: JS: JS: Ok, well let’s back up before we get to those conversations and tell me approximately when it was that you were contacted by the person who you believe was with the FBI. Ok. It’s hard for me to pinpoint, if I had to pinpoint it, it would be in 2007 sometime. Alright. And you were living in Australia at that time, correct? Correct. You were contacted by telephone? That’s correct, by my cell phone. Ok and do you have any idea how your name came up leading to that contact. No idea. No idea whatsoever. When I did ask, I was told that some girls had revealed my name, I guess, and that’s how everybody, the FBI knew to contact me. OK. But I don’t know offhand or sorry, I just walked into the wrong room. Ok. Sorry go on. Yes & J°ll never tell her you said that. Virginia, how long was it after that phone call from the FBI person were you contacted by Mr. Epstein’s lawyers. Like a week. It was back to back to each other. I remember being so scared after talking | to the FBI thinking what’s happening, what’s going on. It’s been like 6 years, 7 years at that stage, how did they find me & what do I have to do with this? So yeah, I do remember that very well, and it was only about a week later I was called by his attorney. Who was it that contacted you, do you remember? I want to say Bill Riley, but he might have been from the FBI. No, it was Bill Riley. Bill Riley. Not sure if that’s his correct name, but that’s what is coming to mind What do you remember about that conversation? I remember a Mr. Goldberger as well, I remember, there might have been two of them. Alright. HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015573

Edwards adv. Epstein Telephone interview with Virginia Roberts Page 19 of 23 V: I can’t remember which one it was. I want to say Bill Riley is the good one. JS: Alright, so either Bill Riley or a Mr. Goldberger or both of them contacted you, and what do you remember about that? V: I don’t know if it was the same guy who contacted me that week later who put me in touch with Jeffrey. I think he was on the phone and he put speakerphone on with Jeffrey. So he connected me with Jeffrey. I don’t know if it was the same guy or different, but I definitely know that Bill Riley was the first guy to contact me. I’m pretty sure about that. JS: Ok. Tell me about that conversation. V: He asked me what I knew about what’s going on with Jeffrey and apparently, there was an investigation being held about some of the girls who had come out and said that Jeffrey had sexual contact with them under the age of a minor and that he was discrediting lot of these girls and making them out to be drug addicts and prostitutes and what have you so they wouldn’t be looked upon as worthy in the court’s eyes so to speak. And you know, he told me in the first five minutes that, you know, if I stay quiet, that “T’ll be looked after” . And that was the exact way it was said. It wasn’t like you know, I’m gonna pay you a zillion dollars or anything if you be quiet, but if I stay quiet, I would “looked after”. And I remember saying I don’t want any part to do with this. You know, this is not something I want to be a part of, ve got a young family. I wish the best for everybody in this, you know, take care kind of thing. A week later, I was called after the hearing by one of Jeffrey’s lawyers. I can’t tell you exactly which one it was but he had Jeffrey on the other line and he connected Jeffrey and I, and Jeffrey tried to make some simple conversation, “How are you? How have things been?” You know what I mean, catching up. JS: Do you know if the lawyer, did the lawyer stay on the line while Jeffrey was speaking to you? V: I’m pretty sure he did. That’s why I think Jeffrey was on speaker phone because it sounded a lot different, and I was never taken off the line to begin with or connected to another line, so I was pretty sure Jeffrey was on speaker phone and the lawyer was making the call. After the simple conversation, it led to what was going on again and you know, Jeffrey couldn’t believe it. You know, he thought he helped all these girls out. He didn’t think he was wrong in any circumstance here at all. A lot of these girls were drug addicts and just after drug money. You know, he was really putting down these women or these girls I should say, not giving them the credit they deserved, and then he exactly repeated what the lawyer said the week before is that he would look after me if I stayed quiet, and if I need any help, you know, his lawyers would represent me and he would get legal help for me, whatever I need, he would do, and I told him exactly, I said, “Jeffrey, I’m the mother of two children at that stage. I’m away from everything there, I don’t want to be a part of it. I’m not going to speak to anybody and I don’t want to speak to anybody, I don’t want to be involved.” That was the last time I heard from him. And the HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015574

Edwards adv. Epstein Telephone interview with Virginia Roberts Page 20 of 23 next thing I knew, I was sent my victim’s letter, my notification of being a victim through the US Attorney’s Office and that’s when I knew it was well out there enough not to have Jeffrey’s lawyers come back on me and discredit me in the same way he had done to all the other girls. So, I called up Joseph Bird who was the recommended lawyers on my paperwork that they had given me and started going from there. JS: So you contact Mr. Joseph Bergs’ office and then you were dealing with his office from that point forward. V: That’s correct. JS: Tell me about the ending of your relationship with Jeffrey. That is, at what point in time did your full time employment end and how did that happen? V: Ok. So, it hadn’t really ended. I walked away from it all. Jeffrey sent me to Thailand where I met my husband and escaped to Australia, never to return back to the states. About 6-months prior to that, he came up with a proposition that I thought was really disgustingly sick. And it really showed me for the first time in 4 years I had been with him that nothing was going to change and I was always just going to be used by him(?) which I did not like. He offered me a mansion and some of his money every month, I forget what he called it, a monthly income of what he made to bear one of his children. The proposition was that if anything ever happened between Jeffrey and I, that I would have to sign my child over to him basically and that the child would be his and Ghislaine’s, and I would be looking after it as long as nothing happened between Jeffrey and I. So, I was kind of freaked out by all of that. I pushed Jeffrey more to please get me some more training, you know, and I was getting older and not of as much interest to Jeffrey anyways. I was 19 now, and he likes a female a lot younger. So he sent me to Thailand, in September 2002_. I was first supposed to meet a girl there and bring her back with me, but I never met up with her. I proceeded get a short course in Thai massage so that was to shut me up about my training so I went there, and one of my friends from school invited me to watch a fight, like a muay thai fight, which is like a form kickboxing. So I went and watched it, and I saw this guy that was a really good fighter, and a girl’s word, looked really hot, so I asked my friend who knew him to introduce me. We got introduced and fell in love immediately, 3 days later Rob proposed and 7 days later I was being married in a buddist temple. I called Jeffrey and told him I’m sorry, I’m never coming back. I’ve gotten married, I’ve fallen in love. I thought he’d wish the best for me but he was kind of rude and he just said “have a good life” and hung up the phone, and that was the last time I'd talked to him ever until all this started again. JS: Ok. Virginia, is there anything else that you would like to add to what you have told us up to this point in time? V: I'd like to know that this time around something’s going to be done about it and that Jeffrey and a lot of his colleagues, no matter how rich they are, will know that there is HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015575

Edwards adv. Epstein Telephone interview with Virginia Roberts Page 21 of 23 law and that there is people that still believe in it. So that’s it. Thank you guys for listening to me, hearing me out and helping me. It’s kind of hard to get through. JS: | Thank you very much. Yes, I’m sure it has been very difficult and I am very appreciative of the courage you have shown in doing what you have done, which really brings me to the last subject, and that is what was it that motivated you to go public with all of this? V: Sharon Richard contacted me. I like her, I do, I like her a lot. I know she’s a journalist, and journalists are normally bloodsucking leeches, but I like her for that, but she is an honest bloodsucking leech. She told me a lot about what was still going on, and she showed me a picture of Jeffrey with a little girl who looks like she could have been 12 years old. I mean it was disgusting. I agreed to talk with her, I never agreed to do anything until she showed me some pictures, and at that stage, being a mother of 3 children and having a daughter who I would do anything for to protect, I would put my neck on the line to make sure she never has to go through what I had to go through, and knowing all of this, and knowing that he’s still out there doing the same exact thing with no regrets, no remorse, no worry about what he’s doing to those girls, and all those girls feeling the same way that I did, so I, you know, I’m doing it because I believe in my heart of hearts it’s the right thing to do. It’s what I would want somebody to do for my daughter or my sister or my friend, and it saddens me to know that it’s still going on right now. It’s like the seashell story. I don’t know if you’re heard the story about the little kid who throws back a starfish, you know, the little brother tries to ask his sister, “why do you throw them in, they’re all gonna die anyways, the little girl says “well, it’s this one that I can help, and this one that I can help,” and that’s what I feel like I’m doing. I’m making a small dent in this big world we live in. JS: I certainly appreciate that courage, and I have heard that story, and you’re absolutely right, that one person may not be able to make a difference for everyone, but one person can make a difference for someone, and hopefully, you are making a difference for someone, and we’re gonna do the best we can to make sure you are making a difference for as many people as possible. Vv: Thanks Jack. JS: Just a few other follow up things I want to ask you and again, if any of these questions are questions that you’re uncomfortable in responding to, then don’t hesitate to tell me that. Do you have any recollection of Jeffrey Epstein’s specifically telling you that “Bill Clinton owes me favors”? Vv: Yes. I do. It was a laugh though. He would laugh it off. You know, I remember asking Jeffrey what’s Bill Clinton doing here kind of thing, and he laughed it off and said well he owes me a favor. He never told me what favors they were. I never knew. I didn’t know if he was serious. It was just a joke. JS: Where was here? HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015576

Edwards adv. Epstein Telephone interview with Virginia Roberts Page 22 of 23 V: He told me a long time ago that everyone owes him favors. They’re all in each other’s pockets. JS: When you say you asked him why is Bill Clinton here, where was here? V: On the island. JS: | When you were present with Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Clinton on the island, who else was there? V: Ghislaine, Emmy, and there was 2 young girls that I could identify. I never really knew them well anyways. It was just 2 girls from New York. JS: And were all of you staying at Jeffrey’s house on the island including Bill Clinton? V: That’s correct. He had about 4 or 5 different villas on his island separate from the main house, and we all stayed in the villas. JS: | Were sexual orgies a regular occurrence on the island at Jeffrey’s house? V: Yes. JS: If we were to take sworn testimony from the people I am going to name, and if those people were to tell the truth about what they knew, do you believe that any of the following people would have relevant information about Jeffrey’s taking advantage of underage girls? So Ill just name a name, and you tell me yes if they told the truth, I think they’d have relevant information or no, I don’t think they would, or I don’t know whether they would or not. Ok? You understand? V: Yes. JS: Ok. Les Wexner. V: I think he has relevant information, but I don’t think he’ II tell you the truth. JS: Ok. Alan Dershowitz. V: Yes. JS: | David Copperfield. V: Don’t know. JS: Tommy Matola. HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015577

Edwards adv. Epstein Telephone interview with Virginia Roberts Page 23 of 23 V: Don’t know. JS: Prince Andrew. V: Yes, he would know a lot of the truth. Again, I don’t know how much he would be able to help you with, but seeing he’s in a lot of trouble himself these days, I think he might, so I think he may be valuable. I’m not too sure of him. JS: Ok. Virginia, I think that’s all I have for you. Let me tell you what I would like to do. As I told you in the beginning of this conversation, we’ve been recording it, and hopefully, we’ve got a clear enough recording so that we’ve taken down everything accurately and when it’s transcribed, it will be clear and accurate, but what I would like to do is transcribe it, send it to you, have you take a look at it, and if there’s anything that we got wrong in the statement, you can write back and you can make changes in the transcript so that the transcript is accurate. Is that fair? V: No worries. That is fair. No problem. JS: Alright, great. I really do appreciate that and tell me what the best way is to send the transcript to you. V: Email. If you just want to send it by email or if you want to send it by mail, either or. JS: | Ok. Give me your email address if you would please. a JS: Let me read that back to you: V: Yep that’s it. BE: Thank you Jenna, appreciate it. V: No problem, Brad. JS: | Thank you very very much. Bye Bye now. V: Take care Jack. Nice meeting you. JS: You too. *Redaction has been made at the request of the witness. HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015578

EXHIBIT K HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015579

From: Donna Paine <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, January 23, 2015 2:31 PM To: Paul Cassell Ce: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: Jeffrey Epstein case Thank you, Paul. I had reached out to Joan previously to be included on Jack Scarola's e-mail distribution list for the Dershowitz suit, but I wasn't sure if this would also be handled by them. I don't want to double up or inundate you, as I know other ITN News colleagues have also been in touch with you. I just wanted to make sure I was on your radar if Judge Marra rules next week. Best, Donna Paine Sent from my iPad On Jan 23, 2015, at 1:10 PM, Paul Cassell <cassellp @law.utah.edu> wrote: Hi Donna, | am passing this information along to Joan, who will add this information into our contacts list. Thanks for your interest in this important case. Paul Paul G. Cassell Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah 332 South 1400 East, Room 101 = Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730 Voice: 801-585-5202 Fax: 801-581-6897 Email: cassellp>@law.utah.edu You can access my publications on http://ssrn.com/author=30160 CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message - along with any/all attachments - is confidential. This message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not use, disseminate, distribute or copy this communication. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply electronic mail and delete the original message. Professor Cassell is admitted to the Utah State Bar, but not the bars of other states. Thank you. From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, January 23, 2015 9:47 AM To: [email protected]; Paul Cassell Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Jeffrey Epstein case Hi Brad and Paul -- | had reached out to you both the other week when the allegations of Jane Doe #3 first became public. | am a freelance TV producer in South Florida, working with ITN News on this story. As you can imagine, given her allegations against Prince Andrew, ITN is quite keen on covering this story as soon as it breaks. BE-000115 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015580

EXHIBIT L HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015581

From: Paul Cassell Sent: Saturday, January 24, 2015 1:25 PM To: Michael Bilton Subject: RE: from Michael Bilton - latest from Daily Mail online Hi Michael, We got the information. Thanks very much. This is a very interesting article that puts a lot of the flight log information together. http://gawker.com/flight-logs-put-clinton-dershowitz-on-pedophile-billio- 1681039971 Let's stay in touch. Hopefully more and more of the truth will out. PC Paul G. Cassell Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah 332 S. 1400 E. , Room 101 Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730 (801) 585-5202 (phone) (801) 581-6897 (fax) cassellp @law.utah.edu You can access my publications on http://ssrn.com/author=30160 CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message - along with any/all attachments - is confidential. This message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not use, disseminate, distribute or copy this communication. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply electronic mail and delete the original message. Professor Cassell is admitted to the Utah State Bar, but not the bars of other states. Thank you. From: Michael Bilton [michaelbilton1 @btinternet.com] Sent: Friday, January 23, 2015 6:04 PM To: Paul Cassell Subject: Re: from Michael Bilton - latest from Daily Mail online You should have had from me a couple of zip files concerning VR's travel seen alongside Prince Andrew's engagements. Has that arrived with you? M On 24 Jan 2015, at 00:58, Paul Cassell wrote: Thanks for the note — looks like various pieces are falling together. PC Paul G. Cassell Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah BE-000111 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015582

EXHIBIT M HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015583

VA Mary E. Pirrotta From: Mary E. Pirrotta Sent: January 22, 2015 9:38 AM To: ‘[email protected]’ Cc: Joan Williams Subject: Re: Edwards, Bradley vs. Dershowitz Document: Complaint (File #: 20150013) Attachments: Complaint.pdf; The Duke of York.pdf Attached is a copy of the Complaint in Case No. CACE 15-000072 and also a copy of Mr. Scarola’s letter to The Duke of York per your request. BE-000029 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015584

Is the full transcript of our telephone a rata ack Virginia part of the public record? TaKe TH I have a request from the press to provide it (se€ below), but I will only do that if it has been filed) °% Begin forwarded message: From: "Hill, James E." <[email protected]> Date: January 28, 2015 at 10:34:00 AM EST To: Jack Scarola <[email protected]> Subject: RE: Question from ABC If possible - I'd also like to see full transcript of the 2011 phone interview you/Edwards conducted with VR while she was still in Australia. From: Hill, James E. Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 9:31 AM To: Jack Scarola’ Subject: RE: Question from ABC Thank you From: Jack Scarola [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 7:19 AM To: Hill, James E. Subject: Re: Question from ABC You will receive a response and copy of the deposition later this morning. On Jan 27, 2015, at 10:00 PM, "Hill, James E." <[email protected]> wrote: Hi Jack - sorry to trouble you. But wondering if you know what documents are source for a new NY Daily News story - quoting what appears to be a Juan Alessi deposition which mentions Andrew visits to PB mansion. Daily News cites newly filed documents. I'm not aware of any new docs that quote Alessi on the issue of Andrew. Can u enlighten me? Do you have access to those portions of the Alessi depo? Not sure which case it would come from. http://m.nydailynews.com/news/national/prince-andrew-sex-massages-epstein-home-repairman-article- 1.2094073 BE-000030 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015585

James E. Hill Producer, ABC News Chicago 312.899.4281 (ofc) | 312.286.1691 (cell) | 312.343.3832 (cell 2) [email protected] Twitter: @jameshillabc 2 ee ee Ee a fee fe fe 2 fe fe of fee fe 2 kee oe 2 fe ee oe oe a kee of 2k fe ee a a ake Ee Ea Ea fe akc a fc a a ke ae ae a a ae fe ake fe ae ae of ea fe ake ae af a ae fe ae Privileged and Confidential Electronic communication is not a secure mode of communication and may be accessed by unauthorized persons. This communication originates from the law firm of Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. and is protected under the Electronic Communication Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. S2510- 2521. The information contained in this E-mail message is privileged and confidential under Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.420 and information intended only for the use of the individual(s) named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copy of this communication is strictly prohibited. Personal messages express views solely of the sender and shall not be attributed to the law firm. If you received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail or by telephone at (800) 780-8607 and destroy all copies of the original message. Thank you. BECCA OO OS a a fo ro aC CIS CI IGG IC ICA Ck a Rea R aR CRC aC Cac ck hc ak ace ake a eae fe ae fea cafe fe a ake fe ake ak fe ake ake fe ae 2A ee 2h 2 IE fe 2 a 62h ae fe fe 2 a feo ae fe 2 ae fe 2 fe fee fe 2 oe fe ee fe fe fe ee fe eo 2 oe Ro ER Re RC fe RE RC a a ak Eafe oe fe af ae fe af fe ae af ake afc fe ae fe fe ae ak Privileged and Confidential Electronic communication is not a secure mode of communication and may be accessed by unauthorized persons. This communication originates from the law firm of Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. and is protected under the Electronic Communication Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. $2510- 2521. The information contained in this E-mail message is privileged and confidential under Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.420 and information intended only for the use of the individual(s) named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copy of this communication is strictly prohibited. Personal messages express views solely of the sender and shall not be attributed to the law firm. If you received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail or by telephone at (800) 780-8607 and destroy all copies of the original message. Thank you. 2 He 2h fe 2 fe fee fh fe 2 eof 2 fee fe 2 fe of ee ee oe 2k 2 2 ee ee af 2 fe 2 fe oe eo ee oe fe a 2 fe fe eo a AC RE a ea ae fe A fe a aC ae ae aC cae ae ae akc ea ae ake fe ake ae ae z BE-000031 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015586

EXHIBIT N HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015587

Paul Cassell From: Paul Cassell Sent: Saturday, January 3, 2015 11:14 AM To: Paul Blake Subject: RE: questions for Dershowitz Questions for Alan Dershowitz 1. Have you ever met a young girl, under the age of 18, in the presence of Jeffrey Epstein or on one of Jeffrey Epstein’s properties? 2. How many times have you visited Jeffrey Epstein’s mansion in West Palm Beach, Florida? 3. The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida reached a non-prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein, in which he agreed to make civil restitution for sexual abuse committed against 40 girls at the mansion. Do you have any reason to doubt that that Jeffrey Epstein sexually abused 40 underaged girls. 4. Didn't Jeffrey Epstein tell you that he repeatedly had sex with these underage girls? 4. Jeffrey Epstein is a now a registered sex offender. Do you have any reason to doubt that this registration is appropriate? 5. Have you ever met Ghislaine Maxwell in the presence of Jeffrey Epstein or at one of his properties? 6. Did you send correspondence to the U.S. Department of Justice in Washington, D.C. (or elsewhere) attacking the credibility of these 40 girls? 7. According to testimony in court cases, when Jeffrey Epstein was at his mansion in West Palm Beach, Florida, he would receive almost daily “massages” that were in fact sexual encounters with these underage girls. Do you have any reason to doubt this testimony? HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015588

8. The U.S. Attorney’s Office gave Epstein a non-prosecution agreement that extended immunity from federal prosecution not only to Epstein but also “any potential co-conspirator”. Isn’t it normal practice for federal prosecutors only to extend immunity to specifically named persons, not an open-ended group of “any” co-conspirator. 9. How did you travel to Epstein’s mansion in West Palm Beach? 10. How many times have you been to Epstein’s private ranch, called “Zorro”, in New Mexico? 11. How many times have you been to Epstein’s private island in the U.S. Virgin Islands, known as Little St. John’s. 12. Did you ever see young girls present at Little St. John’s? 13. If we talk about the time frame of 1998 to 2001, how many times a year were you making telephone calls to Epstein? 14. How many times have you flown on Epstein’s private plane? 15. Did you ever see young girls, potentially under the age of 18, on Epstein’s private plane? HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015589