10
Shared Docs
10
Same-Page
10 / 10
Mentions
significant issue given that the Plaintiff is seeking over $1,000,000 in fees generated by two non-firm lawyers, one of whom remained employed as a Dade County Assistant State Attorney while billing over $700,000 for her work on the Epstein matters. The Agreement should be constructed to implicitly limit t
nt Mr. EFTA00725563 Page 6 Sloman, was pursuing his right to review the Agreement through meetings and filings with the Department of Justice in Washington IU, a review process that did not end until June 23, 2008 just 7 days before Mr. Epstein entered his state plea. b) Plaintiff further alleges that Eps
over 10 years of full-time legal work in this non-firm attorney's ordinary job) are requested for work performed by an Assistant State Attorney for Dade County who was not a civil litigator and hads little or none specialized expertise in areas directly relevant to the consideration of civil settlements. T
costa and First Assistant Mr. Sloman, was pursuing his right to review the Agreement through meetings and filings with the Department of Justice in Washington M., a review process that did not end until June 23, 2008 just 7 days before Mr. Epstein entered his state plea. b) Paintiff further alleges that Eps
over 10 years of full-time legal work in this non-firm attorney's ordinary job) are requested for work performed by an Assistant State Attorney for Dade County who has no specialized expertise in areas relevant to the consideration of civil settlements. These charges are not necessary, reasonable, nor with
a and First Assistant Jeffrey Sloman, was pursuing his right to review the Agreement through meetings and filings with the Department of Justice in Washington M., a review process that did not end until June 23, 2008 just 7 days before Mr. Epstein entered his state plea, see eg letter of US Attorney Acosta t
over 10 years of full-time legal work in this non-firm attorney's ordinary job) are requested for work performed by an Assistant State Attorney for Dade County who has no specialized expertise in areas relevant to the consideration of civil settlements. These charges are not necessary, reasonable, nor wit
ed States Attorney Alexander Acosta, was pursuing his right to review the Agreement through meetings and filings with the Department of Justice in Washington M., see letter appended hereto as Exhibit "A"; b) Plaintiff further alleges that Epstein was in "clear breach of the NPA" by filing a Motion to Dism
over 10 years of full-time legal work in this non-firm attorney's ordinary job) are requested for work performed by an Assistant State Attorney for Dade County who was not a civil litigator and hads little or none specialized expertise in areas directly relevant to the consideration of civil settlements. T
costa and First Assistant Mr. Sloman, was pursuing his right to review the Agreement through meetings and filings with the Department of Justice in Washington M., a review process that did not end until June 23, 2008 just 7 days before Mr. Epstein entered his state plea. b) Paintiff further alleges that Eps
over 10 years of full-time legal work in this non-firm attorney's ordinary job) are requested for work performed by an Assistant State Attorney for Dade County who was not a civil litigator and hads little or none specialized expertise in areas directly relevant to the consideration of civil settlements. T
costa and First Assistant Mr. Sloman, was pursuing his right to review the Agreement through meetings and filings with the Department of Justice in Washington M., a review process that did not end until June 23, 2008 just 7 days before Mr. Epstein entered his state plea. b) Paintiff further alleges that Eps
over 10 years of full-time legal work in this non-firm attorney's ordinary job) are requested for work performed by an Assistant State Attorney for Dade County who has no specialized expertise in areas relevant to the consideration of civil settlements. These charges are not necessary, reasonable, nor with
a and First Assistant Jeffrey Sloman, was pursuing his right to review the Agreement through meetings and filings with the Department of Justice in Washington M., a review process that did not end until June 23, 2008 just 7 days before Mr. Epstein entered his state plea, see eg letter of US Attorney Acosta t
over 10 years of full-time legal work in this non-firm attorney's ordinary job) are requested for work performed by an Assistant State Attorney for Dade County who was not a civil litigator and hads little or none specialized expertise in areas directly relevant to the consideration of civil settlements. T
costa and First Assistant Mr. Sloman, was pursuing his right to review the Agreement through meetings and filings with the Department of Justice in Washington M., a review process that did not end until June 23, 2008 just 7 days before Mr. Epstein entered his state plea. b) Paintiff further alleges that Eps
significant issue given that the Plaintiff is seeking over $1,000,000 in fees generated by two non-firm lawyers, one of whom remained employed as a Dade County Assistant State Attorney while billing over $700,000 for her work on the Epstein matters. The Agreement should be constructed to implicitly limit t
nt Mr. EFTA00614563 Page 6 Sloman, was pursuing his right to review the Agreement through meetings and filings with the Department of Justice in Washington IU, a review process that did not end until June 23, 2008 just 7 days before Mr. Epstein entered his state plea. b) Plaintiff further alleges that Eps
lm “The Departed,” I helped an excellent prosecutor keep a corrupt FBI agent in prison. The prosecutor who asked for my help is the State Attorney of Dade County Florida, which covers the City of Miami and several smaller cities. Katherine Fernandez Rundle replaced Janet Reno in 19 _, when President Clinton ap
s where the money is." It also now turns out that the trial testimony denying any "contingency" fee agreement and any "written document" between the Washingtons and the lawyer concerning a planned money damage suit against Tyson was categorically false. Immediately after Desiree Washington's sexual encounter
Entities connected to both Dade County and Washington, D.C.

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
George W. Bush
PERSON
United States
LOCATION
Donald Trump
PERSONLeon Black
PERSON
Kenneth Marra
PERSONJane Doe
PERSON
Alexander Acosta
PERSON
Bill Clinton
PERSON
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION
Alan Dershowitz
PERSON
Bradley Edwards
PERSON
Jay Lefkowitz
PERSON
Marc Rich
PERSON
New York City
LOCATION
Prince Charles
PERSONMaria Farmer
PERSON
Julie K. Brown
PERSON
Prince Andrew
PERSONScott Rothstein
PERSON