Epstein Secrets

e Austrian passport, the De- fense explains that "Epstein .. . acquired the passport in the 1980s, when hijackings were prevalent, in connection to Middle East travel. The passport was for personal protection in the event of travel to danger- ous areas, only to be presented to potential kidnapers, hijacker

l testimony and where there was "no evidence of influence, harassment or intimidation"); see also United States v. Singh, 2012 WL 3260232, at *3 (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 8, 2012). • Mr. Epstein Has Not Always Been Compliant With His Legal Obli- gations As A Registered Sex Of- fender Defense counsel has conten

to have to be thought about because it's massive," he acknowledged. And he brushed off criticism about weekend visits he plans to make back to the Midwest because his family will be staying there at least through the next school year. "This is a full time job. I'm going to put the hours in. I'm going

the back as he drove, Parmar changed the destination to Boston, Massachusetts, and began driving in that direction, according to the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. The woman woke up as Parmar was driving in Connecticut. She immediately demanded to be driven to White Plains or be dropped off at a nearby police

to have to be thought about because it's massive," he acknowledged. And he brushed off criticism about weekend visits he plans to make back to the Midwest because his family will be staying there at least through the next school year. "This is a full time job. I'm going to put the hours in. I'm going

the back as he drove, Parmar changed the destination to Boston, Massachusetts, and began driving in that direction, according to the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. The woman woke up as Parmar was driving in Connecticut. She immediately demanded to be driven to White Plains or be dropped off at a nearby police

e Austrian passport, the De- fense explains that "Epstein .. . acquired the passport in the 1980s, when hijackings were prevalent, in connection to Middle East travel. The passport was for personal protection in the event of travel to danger- ous areas, only to be presented to potential kidnapers, hijacker

l testimony and where there was "no evidence of influence, harassment or intimidation"); see also United States v. Singh, 2012 WL 3260232, at *3 (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 8, 2012). • Mr. Epstein Has Not Always Been Compliant With His Legal Obli- gations As A Registered Sex Of- fender Defense counsel has conten

2) that Hof- fenberg made decisions at DCC. The allegations about Hoffenberg's decision-making at DCC came from an officer of DCC who worked in the Midwest who stated that (I) he and Hughes reported to Hof- fenberg, (2) at a meeting on Hoffenberg's boat, Hoffenberg said he owned DCC and had put his mo

EFTA00182828 Page 18 of 20 908 F.Supp. 1265 908 F.Supp. 1265 (Cite as: 908 F.Supp. 1265) Memorandum of Decision and Order, October 19, 1995 (E.D.N.Y.). In Brechner, a defendant subjec- ted to a similar truthfulness obligation was asked in a debriefing session whether or not he had received unrepo