Epstein Secrets

the victims had been given, or 18 who is more familiar with that? 19 several someones, had been given access to those 19 MR. KNIGHT: Your Honor, Christopher 20 ten boxes and had viewed them, which would 20 Knight, if I may? While we were waiting for the 21 vitiate any attorney/client privilege in any

KNIGHT: Just to go a little further on 17 and, therefore, the trustee, rather than 17 what Mr. NoiwIrth was saying. Out of these documents 18 Mr. Fanner and his client, because as to them the 18 we've been asking for for a long time, very few of 19 case is over. 19 them would even have privilege on

the victims had been given, or 18 who is more familiar with that? 19 several someones, had been given access to those 19 MR. KNIGHT: Your Honor, Christopher 20 ten boxes and had viewed them, which would 20 Knight, if I may? While we were waiting for the 21 vitiate any attorney/client privilege in any

KNIGHT: Just to go a little further on 17 and, therefore, the trustee, rather than 17 what Mr. NoiwIrth was saying. Out of these documents 18 Mr. Fanner and his client, because as to them the 18 we've been asking for for a long time, very few of 19 case is over. 19 them would even have privilege on

the victims had been given, or 18 who is more familiar with that? 19 several someones, had been given access to those 19 MR. KNIGHT: Your Honor, Christopher 20 ten boxes and had viewed them, which would 20 Knight, if I may? While we were waiting for the 21 vitiate any attorney/client privilege in any

e equation, the other part is — 22 THE COURT: No, no, no, I can appoint a 23 special master. 24 MR. LICHTM.AN: Yes. 25 THE COURT: All right Mr. Fanner. ►ate 36 I special master and you'll have an opportunity to be 2 heard before me before I authorize the release of the 3 information, because

Chambers v. Mississippi, 410 U.S. 284 (1973) 159 Chemical Bank v. Affiliated FM Ins. Co., 154 F.R.D. 91 (S.D.N.Y. 1994) passim EFTA00077611 Christopher v. SmithKline Beecham Corp., 567 U.S. 142 (2012) Colorado v. Connelly, 51 479 U.S. 157 (1986) 139, 141, 142 Colorado v. Spring, 479 U.S. 564 (

. 2003) 259 United States v. Ewell, 383 U.S. 116 (1966) 80 EFTA00077619 United States v. Falso, 544 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2008) United States v. Fanner, 137 F.3d 1265 (10th Cir. 1998) United States v. Feldman, 939 F.3d 182 (2d Cir. 2019) United States v. Fennell, 166, 169 179, 180 8, 20, 27 4

Chambers v. Mississippi, 410 U.S. 284 (1973) 159 Chemical Bank v. Affiliated FM Ins. Co., 154 F.R.D. 91 (S.D.N.Y. 1994) passim EFTA00039426 Christopher v. SmithKline Beecham Corp., 567 U.S. 142 (2012) Colorado v. Connelly, 51 479 U.S. 157 (1986) 139, 141, 142 Colorado v. Spring, 479 U.S. 564 (

. 2003) 259 United States v. Ewell, 383 U.S. 116 (1966) 80 EFTA00039434 United States v. Falso, 544 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2008) United States v. Fanner, 137 F.3d 1265 (10th Cir. 1998) United States v. Feldman, 939 F.3d 182 (2d Cir. 2019) United States v. Fennell, 166, 169 179, 180 8, 20, 27 4

word "includes" is "significant because it "makes clear that the examples enumerated in the text are intended to be illustrative, not exhaustive." Christopher v. SmithKline Beecham Corp., 567 U.S. 142, 162 (2012) (citing Burgess v. United States, 552 U.S. 124, 131 n.3 (2008)). Thus, sexual abuse "as defin

nited States v. Ewell, 383 U.S. 116 (1966) 54 xii EFTA00095079 United States v. Falso, 544 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2008) 113, 114 United States v. Fanner, 137 F.3d 1265 (10th Cir. 1998) 120, 121 United States v. Feldman, 939 F.3d 182 (2d Cir. 2019) 6, 18, 22 United States v. Fennell, 496 F. Supp