Epstein Secrets

sented the case to the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida. In 2007, the Office contacted counsel

e Next Step for a Maturing Victim Rights Movement: Enforcing Crime Victim Rights in the Courts, 33 McGeorge L. Rev. 689, 693 (2002). 6 527 F.3d 391 (Sth Cir. 2008). Other aspects of the case are discussed in Paul G. Cassell & Steven Joffee, The Crime Victims' Expanding Role in a System of Public Prosecutio

ights even before prosecutors filed a superseding indictment covering the specific crimes affecting the victims. Citing Dean, the District Court for the Eastern District of New York agreed that the rights ® John W. Gillis & Douglas E. Beloof, The Next Step for a Maturing Victim Rights Movement: Enforcing Crime Victim Rights in t

v Carvige ing. 526 N.Y 8.20 483 (2d Dept 1988 cos savesowussnsseneesessens smusanssomneasecceeumesvs 35 Doddy v. Oxy USA, Inc., 101 F.3d 448, 459-60 (Sth Cir. 1996)... ce ceeceseeeseeseeeseeeseeeseeseeeneeees 10 Donnelly v. DeChristoforo, 416 U.S. 637, 646-47, 94 S.Ct. 1868, 40 L.Ed.2d 431 (1974). ....... 3

eday & Co., Inc., 518 F.2d 638, 639-40 (2d Cir.1975) 0. ceeeesceseesseeeseeneeeeeeees 13 Chamblee v. Harris & Harris, Inc., 154 F. Supp. 2d 670, 681 (S.D.N-Y. 2001)... eeeeeeeeneees 22 Chnapkova v. Koh, 985 F.2d 79, 82 (2d Cir. 1993) oes cecccsscessecseeceseesseeseeeseceseesseesseeeseeeeeeseeeseeees 22 Dani

ccsssetsceccsneecescsnsecesesnsecesesnseeesesnseeesnsnseersnanseersnsnseerensess United States v. El-Mezain, No. 09-1560, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 24216 (Sth Cir. Dec. 7, 2011) eceesescseeseessneeeeesneeeeeenees United States v. Hamdan, 801 F. Supp. 2d 1247 (CMCR DOLL) ceecccreseccscsnescescseseeesnsnsceesnsnse

r claims against these financial sponsors of terrorism. Statement Of Subject Matter and Appellate Jurisdiction The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York had subject matter jurisdiction over these actions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1330, 1331, 1332, 1350, 1367, 1407, and 1605, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1964 and 2338,

rorist activities and to be affiliated with al-Qaeda. See Wyatt, 785 F. Supp. 2d at 647-48; see also Goldberg v. UBS AG, 660 F. Supp. 2d 410, 428-29 (E.D.N.Y. 2009) (finding that plaintiffs had “sufficiently pled that the defendant consciously disregarded the fact that it was supporting a terrorist organiza

en prosecutors and defense because prosecutor had not consulted with victim in violation of 1/8 U.S.C. § 3771). 8 See In re Dean, 527 F.3d 391, 395 (Sth Cir. 2008) (acknowledging lower court's interpretation of § 3771(a) before any prosecution is underway); Does v. United States, 817 F. Supp. 2d 1337, 1342

onvincing Congress to expand their discretion at the expense of judges' sentencing authority, see United States v. Kupa, 976 F. Supp. 2d 417, 419-27 (E.D.N.Y. 2013) (describing the legislative history and Justice Department lobbying related to federal drug statutes, notably 27 U.S.C. § 841 (2012)). 218 See