Epstein Secrets

was intended to be broad,” as well as being a “mechanism[]” to ensure that victims were treated with fairness. In denying the victims relief, the Fifth Circuit nevertheless concluded that the district court “failed to accord the victims the rights conferred by the CVRA.”346 In particular, the Fifth Circuit

ur continued patience while we conduct a thorough investigation.” The letters also stated: 325 Michele Dargan, “Jeffrey Epstein Plea Hearing Moved to March,” Palm Beach Daily News “The Shiny Sheet,” Jan. 3, 2008. 326 Epstein’s attorneys used discovery pr

victims.” The victims sought appellate review in the Fifth Circuit.°’ There, the court concurred with the district c

it is useful to look at the CVRA’s purposes, language, and judicial interpretations. This Part looks at each of these three issues in turn. 4 > See Michele Dargan, Feds Say They Treated Epstein Victims Fairly, PaLm BEAcH DatLy NEws (Apr. 8, 2011, 7:23 PM), http://goo.gl/TGDed; Conchita Samoff, Billionaire Pedop

Thomas Jr., From Paradise to County Jail: A Billionaire Financial Adviser Will Serve 18 Months in Sex Case, N.Y. Times, July 1, 2008, at C1. 4) See Michele Dargan, Feds Say They Treated Epstein Victims Fairly, Palm Beach Daily News (Apr. 8, 2011, 7:23 PM), http://goo.gl/rGDed; Conchita Sarnoff, Billionaire Pedo

before charges have been filed, courts have uniformly agreed with the victims’ position. Perhaps the leading case to date to assess this question is the Fifth Circuit's decision in In re Dean. °° There, a wealthy corporate criminal defendant reached a generous plea deal with the Government - a deal that the Governmen