Epstein Secrets

underlying action. Id. at 42-43; see generally, Douglas R. Richmond, The Lawyer's Litigation Privilege,

dents of being members of Al—Qaida, such statements would have no relation to the divorce proceeding and would not be protected by the privilege. Gilbert v. People, I Denio 41 (N.Y.Sup.Ct.1845), a vintage New York case, provides an agricultural example of statements bearing no relation to the judicia

hy D. Wilson ca • University of British Columbia, Douglas Kenny Building, Room 2013, 2136 West Malt Vancouv

or non-monetary experiences such as eating chocolate, getting good grades, and exchanging social pleasantries (Linville & Fischer, 1991; Morewedge, Gilbert, Keysar, Berkovitz, & Wilson, 2007). But why does segregation work? One reason is that it intro- duces a temporal discontinuity between experiences

Gomez" Horowitz" , "Renee Smith" NI i randa & Douglas Abrams" "Michael Anderson" Lerner" Zoellner"

Rufus Albemarle" "Roz Lichter" , "Rolondo Gomez" Horowitz" , "Renee Smith" NI i randa & Douglas Abrams" "Michael Anderson" Lerner" Zoellner" Gilbert" "Tom Pritzker" , "Sondra Baker" "Silke Steinber " "Richard M , "Pam Yates" "Michael "MaryAnn , "Llodd Nathan" , "Liz , "John-Alec" "Janin

lack or poor. See F'urman Georgia, 408 U.S. 238, 92 S.Ct. 2726, L.Ed.2d 346 (1972), reh. denied,409 U.S. 902, 93 S.Ct. 89, 34 L.Ed.2d 163 (1972) (Douglas, J., concurring) (in which the Su- preme Court chronicled our history of ra- cial and economic disparity in the execu- tion of accused persons). Cri

.D.N.Y. 969) (same); United States Graewe, 689 F.2d 54 (6th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (protection of witn es and judi- cial process); United States I Gilbert, 425 F.2d 490 (D.C.Cir.1969) (per curi (protection of witnesses); United States Bentvena, 288 F.2d 442 (2d Cir.196 (integrity of judicial proceed

uoted from the opinion of Chief Justice Stone in Douglas v. City of Jeannette, 319 U.S. 157, 163, 63 S.Ct

calls he made were routed through an interstate system, is sufficient to satisfy § 2422(b)'s interstate-commerce element. Accord United States v. Gilbert, 181 F.3d 152, 15849 (1st Cir.1999) (citing cases and ruling that the intrastate use of a telephone provides a sufficient basis for jurisdiction

ustice White filed an opinion con- curring in the judgment and in parts of the court's opinion, in which Mr. Justice Rehnquist joined. Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the decision of the case. West Headnotes 111 Criminal Law 110 C=1028 110 Criminal Law 110XXIV Review 110XXIV(E) Presentation an

757, 761, 6 S.Ct. 1826, 1830, 16 L.Ed.24 908 (1966); see also United States'. Wade, 388 U.S. 218, 222, 87 S.Ct. 1926 191, 18 L.Ed.2d 1149 (1967); Gilbert . California, 388 U.S. 263, 87 S. . 1951, 18 L.Ed.2d 1178 (1967). **2168 [8] In this instance disclosure of the relevant portions of the defense

ng to Hoffenberg. the two men were introduced by Douglas Leese. a de- fense contractor. Epstein has said t

Louis V. Gerstner, Jr., Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, International Business Machines, Amonk; RJR Nabisco; Director, New York Times Lord Gilbert, former Minister for Defense, London Frene Ginwala, speaker of the National Assembly, South Africa Joseph T. Gorman, Chairman, Pres, CEO, TRW Inc.