Epstein Secrets

negotiations as necessary. An intervenor's participation in settlement negotiations is not uncommon. See, e.g., Professional Firefighters Ass'n of Omaha, Local 385 Zalewski, 678 F.3d 640, 647 (8th Cir. 2012)(noting that intervenors participated in settlement negotiations); City Partnership Co. I Atl

cution agreement and the release of material protected by Rule 6(e), both of which are remedies which the plaintiffs have said they are seeking. See Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's Response to Government's Sealed Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction, Doc. 127 at 14. If plaintiffs still

n in a recent pleading, see Doc 381, the identity of each of the Jane Does has been known to Mr. Epstein for many years in part as a result of each Jane Doe's decision to delay the litigation of their CVRA claims in order to prioritize their parallel monetary damage lawsuits against Mr. Epstein during whi

385 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/22/2016 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Plaintiffs I. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant / INTERVENOR JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF HIS ATTENDANCE AT

ate as outlined above. It is not uncommon for intervenors to participate in settlement negotiations. See, e.g., Professional Firefighters Ass 'n of Omaha, Local 385 v. Zalewski, 678 F.3d 640, 647 (8th Cir. 2012)(noting that intervenors participated in settlement negotiations); City Partnership Co. v.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE I AND JANE DOE 2, Plaintiffs v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant INTERVENOR JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF HIS ATTENDANCE AT OR PARTICIPATION IN

ds Performance with Web Search Engines: An Extension Study, Proceedings of the Eleventh Americas Conference on Information Systems. p. 2317 — 2324. Omaha, Nebraska. 11-14 August. Koshman, S. Spink, A., and Jansen, B.J. (2005) Using Clusters on the Vivisimo Web Search Engine, HCI International 2005.

76 EFTA00601652 Appendix B Testimony Cases Last Four Years Year Retained Deliverables Retained by Case 2016 Deposition Report Plaintiff Jane Doe v. Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling Inc.; BHP Billiton Petroleum (Deepwater) Ltd.; Schlumberger Technology Corporation; Aramark Services, In

nia State University, Fullerton University of California, Berkeley State University of New York, Stony Brook Hope College University of Nebraska, Omaha Canadian Bar Association, Vancouver Pennsylvania Trial Lawyers Assn, Philadelphia & Pittsburgh Montana Trial Lawyers Assn, Butte West Virginia T

Balancing with the players stacked against you. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 365-366 (Book Review). Loftus, E.F. & Guyer, M. (2002) Who Abused Jane Doe?: The Hazards of the Single Case History. Skeptical Inquirer. Part I. Vol 26, #3 (May/June), Pp. 24-32. Loftus, E. F. & Guyer, M. J. (2002) Who Abu

a, Phoenix, AZ, November 6-10, 1995 Motorola, Schaumburg, IL, November 27-28, 1995 Williams Companies, Tulsa, OK, December 12-13, 1995 First Data, Omaha, NE, March 11-12, 1996 First Data, Omaha, NE, March 25-26, 1996 Williams Companies, Tulsa, OK, April 1-2, 1996 EFTA00073028 Park Dietz, M.D., M.

k, New York) [2nd Circuit Opinion: 938 F.2d 1535 (2nd Cir. 1991)] Testified at deposition, 5/13/90 Testified in court (trial or hearing), 5/14/90 Jane Doe v. Stuart Brown. M.D. (San Diego, California) Testified by deposition, 6/6/90 Carin Evans vs. Richard Benton, Ph.D. (Houston, Texas) Testified at

wners Corp. Mark Epstein-Affiliated Entity 12/4/2015 E Trade Bank Lesley Groff Alleged Epstein Co-Conspirator 1/3/2017 First National Bank of Omaha Southern Financial LLC Epstein-Controlled Entity 5/12/2014 First Republic Bank Lesley Groff Alleged Epstein Co-Conspirator 12/19/2018 Merrill

e suit. 5 Gut. thLink & Rockenbach, P.A. Lesley Groff 19 $5,509,464 Jeffrey Epstein Link & Rockenbach represented Groff and Epstein in the Jane Doe 43 lawsuit. It is possible that these payments were made solely for the benefit of Epstein. The transaction dates coincide with the lawsuit. " Se

d N Race* Sex Da of Erilh Sole Seasty No. (If svelte) 0 Mae OramtinaleitiA0Q. laialia.Mbal OM Frathettanin Gramm Wilma a 'Maim casanimmaaame• Omaha Malin Ms I IV'S AA noilarn mos swat 0 &WM imM4 CCiani eqsaMem aVeg0 Modem Marl Oam Slam Mart Pad an ‘X‘10 Pinson Miami PAM, Warm Wan Pena. Gentles

ent federal lawsuit last week, on behalf of the Jane Doe • 101 who allegedly visited Epstein a few times