Epstein Secrets

to control the presentation of a witness' testimony' because that act is `fairly within the prosecutor's function as an advocate."' Mikko v. City of Atlanta, GA, 857 F.3d 1136, 1142 (10 Cir. 2017), citing Buckley v. Fitzsimmons 509 U.S. 259, 272-73 (1993). 3 EFTA00601684 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Docume

the subject matter waiver doctrine does not extend to materials protected by the opinion work product privilege." Cox, 17 F.3d at 1422, citing In re Martin Marietta Corp., 856 F.2d 619, 625- 26 (4th Cir. 1988). Petitioners have not identified any documents, for which the government invoked privileges, and for which t

to control the presentation of a witness' testimony' because that act is `fairly within the prosecutor's function as an advocate."' Mikko v. City of Atlanta, GA, 857 F.3d 1136, 1142 (10 Cir. 2017), citing Buckley v. Fitzsimmons 509 U.S. 259, 272-73 (1993). 3 EFTA00799966 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Docume

the subject matter waiver doctrine does not extend to materials protected by the opinion work product privilege." Cox, 17 F.3d at 1422, citing In re Martin Marietta Corp., 856 F.2d 619, 625- 26 (4th Cir. 1988). Petitioners have not identified any documents, for which the government invoked privileges, and for which t

atz MAPLES, Plaintiff, 1. UHS OF GEORGIA, INC., UHS of Geor- gia Holdings, Inc., and UHS of Peach- ford, L.P., doing business as Peach- ford BHS of Atlanta, Defendants. Civil Action No. 1:09-CV-01964—WEJ. United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. May 3, 2010. Background: Former

ion Fire Ins. Co. R. Murray Sheet Metal Co., 967 F.2d 980, 984 (4th Cir.1992) (opinion work product "absolutely immune" from discovery); In re Martin Marietta Corp., 856 F.2d 619, 625 (4th Cir.1988); In re John Doe, 662 F. 2d 1073, 1080 ( 4th Cir. 1981), cert. denied 455 U.S. 1000, 102 *463 S.Ct. 1632, 71 L.E