Epstein Secrets

dragged its feet for 5 years in issuing its preliminary denial notice. The SEC knows this is my information. The SEC committed fraud on the court in Gibraltar. The judge corrected them. The SEC was omitting information that implicated NITE, UBSS and customers like Sason/Hanover/Magna. The SEC was obstruct

4(c)(i) is set forth in Row S of the cover page for each Reporting Person hereto and is incorporated by reference for each such Reporting Person. MG Partners Ltd: Abitebol But not in the complaint: MAGNA GIBRALTAR INVESTMENTS LLC: also Abitebol As with Opco/GIBRALTAR, who is the SEC protecting? EFTA00083136

Subject: Fw: Formal appeal for preliminary denial covered action 2015-016/ Knight Capital TCR & Appendix More evidence of SEC fraud on the court in Gibraltar. It is CLEAR that the Opco AML Covered Action 2015-016 was NOT ENTIRELY based on the SEC Gibraltar Action. The SEC Gibraltar action covered trading

4(c)(i) is set forth in Row 5 of the cover page for each Reporting Person hereto and is incorporated by reference for each such Reporting Person. MG Partners Ltd: Abitebol But not in the complaint: MAGNA GIBRALTAR INVESTMENTS LLC: also Abitebol As with Opco/GIBRALTAR, who is the SEC protecting? AND, per my

Subject: Fw: Formal appeal for preliminary denial covered action 2015-016/ Knight Capital TCR & Appendix More evidence of SEC fraud on the court in Gibraltar. It is CLEAR that the Opco AML Covered Action 2015-016 was NOT ENTIRELY based on the SEC Gibraltar Action. The SEC Gibraltar action covered trading

4(c)(i) is set forth in Row 5 of the cover page for each Reporting Person hereto and is incorporated by reference for each such Reporting Person. MG Partners Ltd: Abitebol But not in the complaint: MAGNA GIBRALTAR INVESTMENTS LLC: also Abitebol As with Opco/GIBRALTAR, who is the SEC protecting? AND, per my

Subject: Fw: Formal appeal for preliminary denial covered action 2015-016/ Knight Capital TCR & Appendix More evidence of SEC fraud on the court in Gibraltar. It is CLEAR that the Opco AML Covered Action 2015-016 was NOT ENTIRELY based on the SEC Gibraltar Action. The SEC Gibraltar action covered trading

4(c)(i) is set forth in Row 5 of the cover page for each Reporting Person hereto and is incorporated by reference for each such Reporting Person. MG Partners Ltd: Abitebol But not in the complaint: MAGNA GIBRALTAR INVESTMENTS LLC: also Abitebol As with Opco/GIBRALTAR, who is the SEC protecting? AND, per my

dragged its feet for 5 years in issuing its preliminary denial notice. The SEC knows this is my information. The SEC committed fraud on the court in Gibraltar. The judge corrected them. The SEC was omitting information that implicated NITE, UBSS and customers like Sason/Hanover/Magna. The SEC was obstruct

orth in Row 5 of the cover page for each Reporting Person hereto and is incorporated by reference for each such Reporting Person. viww. sec .g ov MG Partners Ltd: Abitebol But not in the complaint: MAGNA GIBRALTAR INVESTMENTS LLC: also Abitebol As with Opco/GIBRALTAR, who is the SEC protecting? AND, per my

Subject: Fw: Formal appeal for preliminary denial covered action 2015-016/ Knight Capital TCR & Appendix More evidence of SEC fraud on the court in Gibraltar. It is CLEAR that the Opco AML Covered Action 2015-016 was NOT ENTIRELY based on the SEC Gibraltar Action. The SEC Gibraltar action covered trading

4(c)(i) is set forth in Row 5 of the cover page for each Reporting Person hereto and is incorporated by reference for each such Reporting Person. MG Partners Ltd: Abitebol But not in the complaint: MAGNA GIBRALTAR INVESTMENTS LLC: also Abitebol As with Opco/GIBRALTAR, who is the SEC protecting? AND, per my

D very much up and running today. SHOCKING. The SEC OpCo/Gibraltar complaint is based on the FINRA complaint. That is absolutely irrefutable. As the Gibraltar complaint alleges just 1 OTCM shell and just a million shares while Commissioners Stein and Aguilar referenced BILLIONS of shares in their OpCo waiv

s set forth in Row 5 of the cover page for each Reporting Person hereto and is incorporated by reference for each such Reporting Person. iww. sec MG Partners Ltd: Abitebol But not in the complaint: MAGNA GIBRALTAR INVESTMENTS LLC: also Abitebol As with Opco/GIBRALTAR, who is the SEC protecting? AND, per my

D very much up and running today. SHOCKING. The SEC OpCo/Gibraltar complaint is based on the FINRA complaint. That is absolutely irrefutable. As the Gibraltar complaint alleges just 1 OTCM shell and just a million shares while Commissioners Stein and Aguilar referenced BILLIONS of shares in their OpCo waiv

4(c)(i) is set forth in Row 5 of the cover page for each Reporting Person hereto and is incorporated by reference for each such Reporting Person. MG Partners Ltd: Abitebol But not in the complaint: MAGNA GIBRALTAR INVESTMENTS LLC: also Abitebol As with Opco/GIBRALTAR, who is the SEC protecting? AND, per my