From: Chris Dilorio Sent: Monday, May 18, 2020 10:36 AM Subject: Fw: Formal appeal for preliminary denial covered action 2015-016/ Knight Capital TCR & Appendix As straightforward as it gets: The SEC OWB dragged its feet for 5 years in issuing its preliminary denial notice. The SEC knows this is my information. The SEC committed fraud on the court in Gibraltar. The judge corrected them. The SEC was omitting information that implicated NITE, UBSS and customers like Sason/Hanover/Magna. The SEC was obstructing a thorough investigation of my claims. The naked shorting cited in the CGFIA 10O in 2013 PROVES my allegations. The SEC's "targeted investigation" stops short of a full accounting. The SEC Gibraltar complaint does NOT explain the totality of the Oppenheimer complaint. The SEC Gibralter complaint cites 1 OTCM shell and less than 1 million shares traded by Opco. 2 dissenting Opco waiver SEC Commissioners proved that also citing "BILLIONS" of shares in their dissent. The SEC/Opco AML complaint was based on the FINRA complaint and my information. The SEC OWB concocted a completely fabricated reason for denying my Award: "The SEC investigators involved never saw claimants information". The responsibility to distribute Whistleblower information within the SEC is the exclusive and explicit responsibility of the OWB. As a result, the massive fraud taking place continued well into 2020. The 1O202010O proves this. The SEC IG Hoecker is guilty of violating specific IG requirements in keeping Congress informed of serious matters like mine. The SEC IG Hoecker has never interviewed me despite my filing 2 separate complaints with his office. The SEC IG Hoecker is guilty of criminal obstruction. SEC Chair Clayton and Co Enforcement Peikin worked at Sullivan Cromwell with Jared Fishman. Fishman has played a key role in the SEC facilitated criminal obstruction. Peikin and Clayton should have recused themselves from ANY pending NITE/VIRT matter before the SEC: My information. Clayton and Peikin should have recused themselves from the SEC facilitated KCG/VIRT merger. My information, including the Opco AML complaint SHOULD have stopped the merger from ever happening. 2 former SEC Commissioners agree with that analysis. The SEC is actively facilitating a massive ,ongoing fraud on the American people they are mandated to protect. NITE/VIRT is a criminal entity. The SEC MUST invoke emergency powers and halt trading in VIRT IMMEDIATELY. In short Mr Arp, the criminal activity actively perpetrated by the SEC OWB/IG must be referred to law enforcement as well as Congress. Separate but related: SEC facilitated criminal activity and my claims. The criminality is a matter for law enforcement. My pending matters with the SEC have no bearing on a criminal investigation OR a GAO investigation. You are incorrect in your analysis. I Urge the IG Integrity Board to have SEC IG Hoecker refute my claims point by point. I will be on a plane tomorrow so he can do it in person. Cheers! Christopher J Dilorio Whistleblower From: Chris Dilorio Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2020 8:54 AM EFTA00083133

To: Subject: Fw: Formal appeal for preliminary denial covered action 2015-016/ Knight Capital TCR & Appendix Almost immediately I filed a formal appeal to the SEC OWB fabricated denial of my award application. In this appeal I show irrefutable proof of my allegations: The SEC OWB used/ is using my information to both bring complaints AND obstruct complaints while denying me compensation. In short: My information exposes an ongoing, massive in scope, SEC facilitated fraud on the American people. Rather than shut it down, the SEC has chosen to cover up so that the illegal activity can continue. It does in 2020 Chris From: Chris Dilorio ‹ > Sent: Monday, May 11, 2020 7:16 PM Subject: Fw: Formal appeal for preliminary denial covered action 2015-016/ Knight Capital TCR & Appendix From: Chris Dilorio c > Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2020 8:03 AM Subject: Fw: Formal appeal for preliminary denial covered action 2015-016/ Knight Capital TCR & Appendix The SMOKING GUN in my allegations: Naked shorting in CGFIA (My TCR/FINRA complaint) by "un named third party BD" in 2013. Well known to the SEC. This is why there was no investigation into the ENTIRETY of the FINRA trading activity. The SEC issued waivers to Opco within days of its AML complaint. WHO was the SEC protecting? WHO were the customers and executing BD's/MM's in the Opco complaint? ALSO well known to the SEC: MY INFORMATION. 5 years to get a preliminary denial: statute of limitations. BUT the last overt act of this ongoing conspiracy has not yet occurred. Chris From: Chris Dilorio c > Sent: Wednesda A.ril 29 2020 7:56 AM Subject: Fw: Formal appeal for preliminary denial covered action 2015-016/ Knight Capital TCR & Appendix Still more evidence of a well orchestrated scheme to cover up and obstruct a FULL SEC investigation into Opco/Gibraltar/NITE/UBSS trading activity in billions of shares of OTCM money laundering shells. The SEC used my information to bring AND obstruct complaints. The 2 SEC Commissioners dissent in granting Oppenheimer waivers after this egregious activity EFTA00083134

https://www.sec.gov/news/statement/dissenting-statement-oppenheimer-inc.html SEC.gov I Dissenting Statement In the Matter of Oppenheimer & Co., Inc. Dissenting Statement In the Matter of Oppenheimer & Co., Inc., by Commissioner Luis A. Aguilar and Commissioner Kara M. Stein, February 4, 2015 www.sec.gov n fact, the SEC waivers came within days of their complaint. Here, these 2 Commissioners cite Oppenheimer trading "BILLIONS of shares of penny stocks". Clearly, they were not JUST referencing the SEC Gibraltar complaint. WHO was the SEC protecting with its complaint then waivers? The smoking gun which I have provided to the SEC on several e mails: Which came in an SEC reviewed CGFIA 10O https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1344394/000135448814000425/cgfi 10q.htm cgfi_10q.htm - SEC Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. www.sec.gov pg 27 "Our stock is subject to a "Global Lock" imposed by the Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation (DTCC)" "On September 24, 2013, we were notified that the DTCC would be placing a 'Global Lock" on the Company's Class A stock as a result of actions by a third-party broker dealer. On November 11 2013, DTCC imposed the "Global Lock". Since less than 0.02% of the Company's Class A common stock shares were held within DTCC, Management chose to not undertake the expense of challenging the Global Lock. Nevertheless, shares that are held in street name (CEDE & CO), will not be able to be withdrawn from DTCC without further action." Of Course, I have hard copies if you prefer. ex clearing: The illegal SEC/DTCC Obligation Warehouse. This is CLEAR,IREEFUTABLE,INCONTROVETIBLE evidence of naked shorting by executing BD's in CGFIA. This activity took place per my Knight/UBSS TCR submitted to the SEC. So, WHY did the SEC obstruct an investigation into the ENTIRETY of the trading activity in the FINRA (and FINCEN) complaints? WHO were the executing BD's/MM's? WHO were the customers? The veracity of my information is also irrefutable and incontrovertible. Game. Set. Match. The SEC is a grossly corrupt, criminal enterprise facilitating illegal activity detailed by me so that this activity can continue. It does in 2020. The SEC solicits then uses Whistleblower information (MINE) to bring complaints AND obstruct other illegal activity while denying proper compensation to whistleblowers (ME). The SEC KNEW who the "third party BD" was in the CGFIA filing long before it filed its Opco complaint in 2015. It had my TCR in its possession in March 2013. So why did it take 5 years for the SEC to issue its preliminary denial? I would remind the SEC that this is very much an ONGOING conspiracy on the part of the SEC et al. IN FURTHERANCE OF THE CONSPIRACY EFTA00083135

Cheers! Christopher _I Dilorio Whistleblower From: Chris Dilorio Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2020 7:24 AM uoject. rw: rormai appeal for preliminary Emmet coverea action ZU.I.,-V1O/ Knignt Leona' K.R & Appentux Per my extensive SEC TCR's: Josh Sason/Emanuel/Abitebol/Hanover/Magna extensive overlap with NITE/VIRT (and AQR) money laundering shells. The SEC Sason/Magna/NewLead Feb 2019 complaint: also my information https://www.sec.gov/litigation/complaints/2019/comp24403.pdf Marc P Berger SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Brookfield Place 200 Vesey Street, Suite 400 New York, NY 10281-1022 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JOSHUA SASON, MARC MANUEL, 3 S. In addition, Pallas acted as an underwriter for a primary offering of NewLead stock, which NewLead attempted to disguise as an asset sale transaction. www. sec .g ov https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/ 1322587/000114420413065095/v361773 scl3g.htm www.sec.gov (i) Sole power to vote or to direct the vote . The information required by Item 4(c)(i) is set forth in Row S of the cover page for each Reporting Person hereto and is incorporated by reference for each such Reporting Person. MG Partners Ltd: Abitebol But not in the complaint: MAGNA GIBRALTAR INVESTMENTS LLC: also Abitebol As with Opco/GIBRALTAR, who is the SEC protecting? EFTA00083136