Epstein Secrets

Market Improvement $16633397 Value: Total Market Value: $18145397 Business Associates - 3 records found # Name Address 1. JAPAN FLEET SERVICE (DELAWARE) INC. 32 LOOCKERMAN PLZ STE L-100 DOVER, DE 19901-7328 2. ZORRO DEVELOPMENT CORP. HWY 41 STANLEY, NM 87056 3. ZORRO RANCH STANLEY, NM Person

ts, the following data is for information purposes only and is not an official record. Certified copies may be obtained from that individual state's Department of State. Your OPPA Permissible Use is: Debt Recovery/Fraud Your GLBA Permissible Use is: Legal Compliance Copyright 2014 LexisNexis. a division of Reed El

R PW F• rigePP l7G Alabama, Adzona, Florida. Georgia. bateelttla, Mississippi, New Mexico, North Carolina, Texas, Virginia ArkanSa, Connecticut, Deiaware, Kentucky, Maine, Meatiachtsettc, New Nampa**, New Jersey. New York, OS, Pennsylvania. Rhode hand, Vement, West Virginia Ninon. Indiana, Iowa. K

r Separate Forms on This Page I I SDNY_GM_02771883 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EF1'A_0025869I EFTA01338195 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida A. Marie Villafana SOO S. Australian Ave, 4th Floor West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 82

\ &kul. Ract\'‘A‘sa, kutula coa, At.)/F o l,, us-e- 5\aotg_tc- co '" j:-P° 051 -1/4° Oraithm)(` one . LimukcIl hcwe #L iett4o ce 5COZCLA..2\ de &ctC\ (.3 /1/4Qn t_i_tc4c22S no-t ‘teick?-3-a-C ca..-Lt) 444 .AL" ) 14nr'`N\ 5r- \Aci) CiS Locxja, (.412.04. ko c cat a. \QA- VsLoAciiRk (vith

• • FD.246.1 (Rov.1-44)9) U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Investigation Bureau File Number C 19 Field Office Criminal Investigative and Administrative Files Armed and Dangerous

> See, e.g., id. at 17-19 (providing examples of the Justice Department's prosecution of state and local officials). 56 Td

seek review of prosecutors' decisions within the Department of Justice hierarchy, although it also explicitly bars judic

- victims - to prosecute alleged criminal wrongdoing. Redundant charging authority takes other forms as well. In large hierarchical agencies such as the U.S. Department of Justice, internal administrative review of front-line prosecutors’ charging or declination decisions by higher-ups creates a version of redundant enforcement

ive review somewhat comparable to those in E.U. member states. Federal law grants victims a right to seek review of prosecutors' decisions within the Department of Justice hierarchy, although it also explicitly bars judicial review of Justice Department decisions in this process. !!4 Although decision makers in an inter

cccccccccesceessseesseesseesseeeseeessees 73 III. THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT’S UNPERSUASIVE POSITION .........0....00000- 75 A.

CVRA rights attach when an officer or employee of the Department of Justice or any other department or agency of the United S

ns 71 C. Courts Recognize That Crime Victims Have CVRA Rights Before Charging .........ccccccccccccccccccccccesceessseesseesseesseeeseeessees 73 III. THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT’S UNPERSUASIVE POSITION .........0....00000- 75 A. OLC’s Misreading of the CVRA’s Definition of “Victim” ........ 76 B. OLC’s Distortion of the CVRA’s

hat potential charges will never be filed. The issue of pre-charging rights has most prominently surfaced in connection with federal cases. In 2010, the Department of Justice’s Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) weighed in on the issue and released a legal opinion arguing that victims of federal crimes have no CVRA rights during

of 31 104 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 59, *75 II. The Justice Department's Unpersuasive Position Despite the CVRA's broad r

cifically directs that "officers and employees of the Department of Justice and other departments and agencies of the United

hat potential charges will never be filed. The issue of pre-charging rights has most prominently surfaced in connection with federal cases. In 2010, the Department of Justice's Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) weighed in on the issue and released a legal opinion arguing that victims of federal crimes have no CVRA rights during

, at 3 (S.D. Fla. June 19, 2013). DAVID SCHOEN HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017614 --- PAGE BREAK --- Page 12 of 31 104 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 59, *75 II. The Justice Department's Unpersuasive Position Despite the CVRA's broad remedial purposes, its expansive language referring to investigations, and the unanimous case law ext

acsimile: www.kirkland.com Dir. Fax: June 19, 2008 John Roth, Esq. Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General Office of the Deputy Attorney General United States Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Room 4115 Washington, D.C. 20530 Dear Mr. Roth: I again want to thank you for this opportunity to explain why we be

e prosecuted. The new Grand Jury subpoena clearly violates the Non- Prosecution Agreement. Although Mr. Epstein has exercised his rights to appeal to the Department of Justice with the full consent and knowledge of the USAO, he has not breached the Agreement. The re-commencing of the Grand Jury is in violation of the Agreem

lly fast because I didn’t want to make it sound like I was lying or anything. EM at 38-39. Thus, consistent with the guidance provided in Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154 (1978), the search warrant affidavit in this case reveals knowing and reckless falsehoods and omitted material information. This is pre