Epstein Secrets

30) etn1) brae Limit Parkway columbus OH 4 614:20/-a te 800-7 9-7243 Sleeper. - Skypage it _ __ 5 At Pin Number 047 -6940 hilf-MD 614-47 7 Bill Archer 410-44 228 Mobil Phone-MD 114-3 14 14-47 7080 Ohio fax 14-47 21 Home-001 42 Home Westerville 1 Motile Phan-[mol -93 gi70 24 hr numbe 614-47

7-881 8 mh) Magaziner, Ira C. 617 774 0110 h.d 017 77 Email: Maguire, 140 W. 861h ree rk 1 023 n 9 )) uire@tumerc deed line) S a Hurley) Mahler, Giovanni 00 41 91 227904 ( Lugano) Mahoney, Sean 666 Greenwich Street, 41004 8Naim Mailer, Michael 28 Old Fulton St. 07H H arookl e" ht NY 112

homasil$V100802-1306 0-777-30 0.776483- FAX Emelt TSRarchitectstacompuserve. 340 513 4007 cm Romualdez, Daniel arantect 119 West 23rd Street Sanchez, Carlos Pedro Antonio Deatarcon 41 4th floor r oadie, 18004ipain 34 958 2504 w) 34 958 2504 (w0 estudioacarinanchez.ne, BM? 00 34 250454 w

Julia Reed assistant: Janice Neal assistant: Maher Bitar: Jimmy Cayne: Noah Tepperberg: Vera Wang

00309068 Leon Black: Henry Rosovsky: HOME Lawrence Krauss: Andrew Farkas: Joe Pagano: JP Molyneux: Ace Greenberg: Office Peggy Siegel: Lily Sanchez: Marty Weinberg: Alan Dershowitz: Bill Riley: Steve Kosslyn: Wilson Glasses-trapp Martin Nowak: Harvard Vanessa Modely: Tom Barrack: Kasia

you with time to review these options with your client. We em available by phone or to person, in the interim, to It is not clear torn your letter "Maher you believe that attorneys in this Office hart acted knecopfdy. Your idler, for examp!c, alludes to the need to engage in an Inquiry to assurethat d

Washington would be undertaken expeditiously Ou September 7, 2007,i, along with FAUSAt,AUSAs and FBI agents, met with you, Mr. Lefkowitz, and Ms. Sanchez. I understood that you wished to present Federalism-based con r • our prosecution. To ensure a full consideration of your arguments, l invited C

ar i wn costs and fees. Plaintiffs' reliance on Maher Gagne, 488 U.S. U.S. , 129 (1980) and Texas

ntent to perform the busi- ness of the employer and, as such, is not within the scope of employment" Fitzger- ald, 410 Aid at 1272. For example, in Sanchez by Rivera v. Montanez, 165 Pa. Cmwlth. 381, 645 Aid 383 (1994), a child and his parents sued a community action agency, alleging that the agency w