3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
3 / 3
Mentions
awoke and smiled inside. Her heart began beating wild inside. So what did she do? I leave it to you. Sh
h Court dismissed the case as moot, thus postponing the decision as to whether it would uphold race-specific affirmative action programs. But Justice William O. Douglas, probably the 57 DeFunis v. Odegaard, 416 U.S. 312 (1974). 291 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017378 4.2.12 WC: 191694 court’s most liberal member at the time,
girls at Coney Island, because we heard they had wild reputations (meaning we could get to “first base”
never I visited—then as a full participant). The first time I went to Kronheim’s for lunch, we picked up two justices at the Supreme Court building: William O. Douglas and William Brennan. I had previously met Justice Brennan through his son Bill, who was my law school classmate and moot court partner. Justice Brenn
witz, looking like a tweedy Marx Brother with his wild nimbus of ash-blond hair, saying that he felt Ha
rari in Rudolph v. Alabama (1963)—a case involving imposition of the death penalty on a black man who was convicted of raping a white woman. Justice William O. Douglas signed on as well. The dissenters invited the bar to address the following questions, which they deemed “relevant and worthy of argument and consider
Entities connected to both Courtney Wild and William O. Douglas

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
Marc Rich
PERSONLeon Black
PERSON
United States
LOCATION
Prince Andrew
PERSON
Alan Dershowitz
PERSON
Bill Clinton
PERSON
Joe Biden
PERSON
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION
Prince Charles
PERSON
Julie K. Brown
PERSON
Woody Allen
PERSON
Vicky Ward
PERSON
Stephen Hawking
PERSON
Barry Diller
PERSON
John F. Kennedy
PERSON
Michael Cohen
PERSON
Harvey Weinstein
PERSON
Michael Douglas
PERSON
South
LOCATION