Back to Network
6
Shared Docs
6
Same-Page
6 / 6
Mentions
Document Mentions (6 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
(d)(3)'s provision that victims may vindicate their CVRA For this reason, the Court respectfully disagrees with the interpretation adopted in In re Petersen, No. 10-298, 2010 WL 5108692 (N.D. Ind. Dec. 8, 2010), upon which the United States relies. See id. at *2 (holding that a "victim's 'right to be tre
and the U.S. This background discussion is based on the allegations in Plaintiffs' Petition for Enforcement of Crime Victims' Rights Act (DE I) and the Statement of Material Facts in Plaintiffs' Motion for Finding of Violation of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (DEs 48, 52). These allegations are not yet supported by evidence a
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
(d)(3)'s provision that victims may vindicate their CVRA For this reason, the Court respectfully disagrees with the interpretation adopted in In re Petersen, No. 10-298, 2010 WL 5108692 (N.D. Ind. Dec. 8, 2010), upon which the United States relies. See id. at *2 (holding that a "victim's `right to be tre
and the U.S. This background discussion is based on the allegations in Plaintiffs' Petition for Enforcement of Crime Victims' Rights Act (DE I) and the Statement of Material Facts in Plaintiffs' Motion for Finding of Violation of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (DEs 48, 52). These allegations are not yet supported by evidence a
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
(d)(3)'s provision that victims may vindicate their CVRA For this reason, the Court respectfully disagrees with the interpretation adopted in In re Petersen, No. 10-298, 2010 WL 5108692 (N.D. Ind. Dec. 8, 2010), upon which the United States relies. See id. at *2 (holding that a "victim's 'right to be tre
and the U.S. This background discussion is based on the allegations in Plaintiffs' Petition for Enforcement of Crime Victims' Rights Act (DE I) and the Statement of Material Facts in Plaintiffs' Motion for Finding of Violation of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (DEs 48, 52). These allegations are not yet supported by evidence a
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
(d)(3)'s provision that victims may vindicate their CVRA For this reason, the Court respectfully disagrees with the interpretation adopted in In re Petersen, No. 10-298, 2010 WL 5108692 (N.D. Ind. Dec. 8, 2010), upon which the United States relies. See id. at *2 (holding that a "victim's `right to be tre
and the U.S. This background discussion is based on the allegations in Plaintiffs' Petition for Enforcement of Crime Victims' Rights Act (DE I) and the Statement of Material Facts in Plaintiffs' Motion for Finding of Violation of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (DEs 48, 52). These allegations are not yet supported by evidence a
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
(d)(3)'s provision that victims may vindicate their CVRA For this reason, the Court respectfully disagrees with the interpretation adopted in In re Petersen, No. 10-298, 2010 WL 5108692 (N.D. Ind. Dec. 8, 2010), upon which the United States relies. See id. at *2 (holding that a "victim's 'right to be tre
and the U.S. This background discussion is based on the allegations in Plaintiffs' Petition for Enforcement of Crime Victims' Rights Act (DE I) and the Statement of Material Facts in Plaintiffs' Motion for Finding of Violation of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (DEs 48, 52). These allegations are not yet supported by evidence a
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
)(3)'s provision that victims may vindicate their CVRA 5 For this reason, the Court respectfully disagrees with the interpretation adopted in In re Petersen, No. 10-298, 2010 WL 5108692 (M. Ind. Dec. 8, 2010), upon which the United States relies. See id. at *2 (holding that a "victim's `right to be treat
and the U.S. This background discussion is based on the allegations in Plaintiffs' Petition for Enforcement of Crime Victims' Rights Act (DE I) and the Statement of Material Facts in Plaintiffs' Motion for Finding of Violation of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (DEs 48, 52). These allegations are not yet supported by evidence a
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (26)
Entities connected to both Petersen and the Statement of Material Facts
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON21 w/ Petersen·6 w/ the
United States
LOCATION19 w/ Petersen·6 w/ the
RU
Rubin
PERSON17 w/ Petersen·6 w/ the
LB
Leon Black
PERSON16 w/ Petersen·6 w/ the
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON15 w/ Petersen·6 w/ the
Kenneth Marra
PERSON12 w/ Petersen·6 w/ the
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON12 w/ Petersen·6 w/ the
Office for the Southern District of Florida
ORGANIZATION9 w/ Petersen·6 w/ the
MW
Martin Weinberg
PERSON9 w/ Petersen·6 w/ the
Reinhart
PERSON7 w/ Petersen·6 w/ the
RB
Roy Black
PERSON7 w/ Petersen·6 w/ the
Jay Lefkowitz
PERSON7 w/ Petersen·6 w/ the
Ford Trucks Sales, Inc.
ORGANIZATION6 w/ Petersen·6 w/ the
Bayshore
LOCATION6 w/ Petersen·6 w/ the
Kenna
PERSON6 w/ Petersen·6 w/ the
CH
Chambers
PERSON6 w/ Petersen·6 w/ the
Riverside
LOCATION6 w/ Petersen·6 w/ the
ME
Mendoza
PERSON6 w/ Petersen·6 w/ the
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION7 w/ Petersen·5 w/ the
Facts
ORGANIZATION6 w/ Petersen·6 w/ the