Epstein Secrets

ule, or regulation, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dort LLP requests on behalf of JPMorgan that confidential treatment be accorded to this letter (Bates numbered JPM-SDNY-CL-011-0001 through JPM-SDNY-CL-011-0002) and the referenced materials (Bates numbered JPM-SDNY-00065487 through ,IPM-SDNY-000655

ons, do not hesitate to contact me at the above-referenced number. Enclosure See, e.g., NLRB v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co., 437 U.S. 214 (1978). 2 See Dept of Justice v. Reports Comm. For Freedom of Press, 489 U.S. 749 (1989). 3 See. e.g., Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281 (1979). Confidential Treatment Requ

rule, or regulation, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Don LLP requests on behalf of JPMorgan that confidential treatment be accorded to this letter (Bates numbered JPM-SDNY-CL-012-000l through JPM-SDNY-CL-012-0003) and the referenced materials (Bates numbered JPM-SDNY-00065519 through JPM-SDNY-0006553

sel and (b) employees of the Department (or any other government agency). 2 3 See, e.g., NLRB v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co., 437 U.S. 214 (1978). See Dept of Justice v. Reports Comm. For Freedom of Press, 489 U.S. 749 (1989). See, e.g., Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281 (1979). Confidential Treatment Request

ule, or regulation, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Don- LLP requests on behalf of JPMorgan that confidential treatment be accorded to this letter (Bates numbered JPM-SDNY-CL-002-0001 through JPM-SDNY-CL-002-0003) and the referenced materials (Bates numbered JPM-SDNY-00000004 through JPM-SDNY-0000001

ited States mail for such notice. If the Department is not satisfied that the See, e.g., NLRB v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co., 437 U.S. 214 (1978). 2 See Dept of Justice v. Reports Comm. For Freedom of Press, 489 U.S. 749 (1989). 3 See, e.g., Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281 (1979). Confidential Treatment Requ

l, and . For your convenience, Appendix A includes a chart identifying the account numbers, account names, and date ranges of account statements by Bates number. The chart is organized by the individual associated with each account. Consistent with our production dated September 25, 2019, accounts li

ing, telephone conversation, or interview between (a) our client's current or See, e.g., NLRB v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co., 437 U.S. 214 (1978). 2 See Dept of Justice v. Reports Comm. For Freedom of Press, 489 U.S. 749 (1989). 3 See, e.g., Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281 (1979). Confidential Theatawat Requ