iates, representatives, agents, auditors, or counsel and (b) employees of the Department (or any other government agency). 2 3 See, e.g., NLRB v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co., 437 U.S. 214 (1978). See Dept ofJustice v. Reports Comm. For Freedom of Press, 489 U.S. 749 (1989). See, e.g., Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 2

allowing litigants earlier or greater access to agency investigatory files than they would otherwise have." oC nti, 2014 WL 1274517, at *22 (citing Robbins Tire & Rubber Co., 437 U.S. at 224-25); see also New York Times, 2016 WL 5946711, at 4'13 ("Such explanations are sufficient to establish that the withholdings concea

pending or reasonably foreseeable at the time of the withholding. See,e.g., Kay v. F.C.C., 976 F. Supp. 23, 37-38 (D.D.C. 1997) (citing N.L.R.B. v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co.,437 U.S. 214, 220 (1978)). The government's burden to establish the applicability of Exemption 7(A) is not high; the government need only show that

07 F. Supp. 3d 334 (S.D.N.Y. 2019) 19 Kubik v. U.S. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, No. 10-6078-TC, 2011 WL 2619538 (D. Or. July 1, 2011) 19 N.L.R.B v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co., 437 U.S. 214 (1978) 6 Nat? Archives & Records Admin. v. Favish, 541 U.S. 157 (2004) 11, 13, 14 New York Times Co. v. Dep't of Justice, No. 1

nal Intelligence, No. 16-2517 (CKK), 2020 WL 805380 (D.D.C. Feb. 18, 2020) 15 Maynard v. C.I.A., 986 F.2d 547 (1st Cir. 19 93) 5, 6 N.L.R.B. v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co., 437 U.S. 214 (1 978) 7, 8, 12 N.Y. Times v. Dep of Justice, 872 F. Supp. 2d 309 (S.D.N.Y. 2012) 5 NAACP Legal Dtf & Educ. Fund, Inc. v. U.S. D

Raza v. Dep't ofJustice, 411 F.3d 350 (2d Cir. 2005) 6 iv EFTA00071627 Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 27 Filed 09/10/20 Page 5 of 29 NLRB v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co., 437 U.S. 214, 227 (1978) 9, 10 NRDC v. EPA, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124353 (S.D.N.Y. July 25, 2019) 20 Pratt v. Webster, 673 F.2d 408 (D.C. Cir

nal Intelligence, No. 16-2517 (CKK), 2020 WL 805380 (D.D.C. Feb. 18, 2020) 15 Maynard v. C.I.A., 986 F.2d 547 (1st Cir. 19 93) 5, 6 N.L.R.B. v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co., 437 U.S. 214 (1 978) 7, 8, 12 N.Y. Times v. Dep of Justice, 872 F. Supp. 2d 309 (S.D.N.Y. 2012) 5 NAACP Legal Dtf & Educ. Fund, Inc. v. U.S. D

ephone the undersigned rather than rely upon the United States mail for such notice. If the Department is not satisfied that the See, e.g., NLRB v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co., 437 U.S. 214 (1978). 2 See Dept of Justice v. Reports Comm. For Freedom of Press, 489 U.S. 749 (1989). 3 See, e.g., Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441

07 F. Supp. 3d 334 (S.D.N.Y. 2019) 19 Kubik v. U.S. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, No. 10-6078-TC, 2011 WL 2619538 (D. Or. July 1, 2011) 19 N.L.R.B v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co., 437 U.S. 214 (1978) 6 Nat? Archives & Records Admin. v. Favish, 541 U.S. 157 (2004) 11, 13, 14 New York Times Co. v. Dep't of Justice, No. 1

Raza v. Dep't ofJustice, 411 F.3d 350 (2d Cir. 2005) 6 iv EFTA00088704 Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 27 Filed 09/10/20 Page 5 of 29 NLRB v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co., 437 U.S. 214, 227 (1978) 9, 10 NRDC v. EPA, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124353 (S.D.N.Y. July 25, 2019) 20 Pratt v. Webster, 673 F.2d 408 (D.C. Cir

nal Intelligence, No. 16-2517 (CKK), 2020 WL 805380 (D.D.C. Feb. 18, 2020) 15 Maynard v. C.I.A., 986 F.2d 547 (1st Cir. 19 93) 5, 6 N.L.R.B. v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co., 437 U.S. 214 (1 978) 7, 8, 12 N.Y. Times v. Dep of Justice, 872 F. Supp. 2d 309 (S.D.N.Y. 2012) 5 NAACP Legal Dtf & Educ. Fund, Inc. v. U.S. D

tial Material; or (2) refer to any conference, meeting, telephone conversation, or interview between (a) our client's current or See, e.g., NLRB v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co., 437 U.S. 214 (1978). 2 See Dept of Justice v. Reports Comm. For Freedom of Press, 489 U.S. 749 (1989). 3 See, e.g., Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441

activities of JPMorgan, its employees, and its clients and their employees and agents, and not to the activities of any federal See, e.g., NLRB v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co., 437 U.S. 214 (1978). Confidential Treatment Requested by JP Morgan Chase JPM-SDNY-CL-007-0002 EFTA00096343 WILMERHALE September 2, 2020 Page

07 F. Supp. 3d 334 (S.D.N.Y. 2019) 19 Kubik v. U.S. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, No. 10-6078-TC, 2011 WL 2619538 (D. Or. July 1, 2011) 19 N.L.R.B v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co., 437 U.S. 214 (1978) 6 Nat? Archives & Records Admin. v. Favish, 541 U.S. 157 (2004) 11, 13, 14 New York Times Co. v. Dep't of Justice, No. 1

ot be subject to production. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact me at the above-referenced number. Enclosure See, e.g., NLRB v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co., 437 U.S. 214 (1978). 2 See Dept of Justice v. Reports Comm. For Freedom of Press, 489 U.S. 749 (1989). 3 See. e.g., Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441

iates, representatives, agents, auditors, or counsel and (b) employees of the Department (or any other government agency). 2 3 See, e.g., NLRB v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co., 437 U.S. 214 (1978). See Dept of Justice v. Reports Comm. For Freedom of Press, 489 U.S. 749 (1989). See, e.g., Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S.