, NLRB v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co., 437 U.S. 214 (1978). See Dept ofJustice v. Reports Comm. For Freedom of Press, 489 U.S. 749 (1989). See, e.g., Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281 (1979). Confidential Treatment Requested by JPMorgan Chase JPM-SDNY-CL-012-0002 EFTA00014879 --- PAGE BREAK --- WI LM ER

v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co., 437 U.S. 214 (1978). 2 See Dept of Justice v. Reports Comm. For Freedom of Press, 489 U.S. 749 (1989). 3 See, e.g., Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281 (1979). Confidential Treatment Requested by JP Morgan Chase JPN1-SDNY-CL-002-0002 EFTA00081983 WI LM ERHALE November 15,

v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co., 437 U.S. 214 (1978). 2 See Dept of Justice v. Reports Comm. For Freedom of Press, 489 U.S. 749 (1989). 3 See, e.g., Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281 (1979). Confidential Theatawat Requested by JP Morgan Chase JPM-SDNY-CL-005-0002 EFTA00090640 WILMERHALE Esq• March 3,

erenced number. Sincerely, Anjan Sahni Enclosure 2 3 See Dept of-ha:ice v. Reports Comm. For Freedom of Press, 489 U.S. 749 (1989). See, e.g., Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281 (1979). Confidential Treatment Requested by JP Morgan Chase JPM-SDNY-CL-007-0003 EFTA00096344 WILMERHALE September 2, 20

v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co., 437 U.S. 214 (1978). 2 See Dept of Justice v. Reports Comm. For Freedom of Press, 489 U.S. 749 (1989). 3 See. e.g., Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281 (1979). Confidential Treatment Requested by JPMorgan Chase JPM-SDNY-CL-011.0002 SDNY_GM_02775033 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORD

NLRB v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co., 437 U.S. 214 (1978). See Dept of Justice v. Reports Comm. For Freedom of Press, 489 U.S. 749 (1989). See, e.g., Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281 (1979). Confidential Treatment Requested by JPMorgan Chase JPM-SDNY-CL-012-0002 SDNY_GM_02775074 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORD

T Corp. v. Lillis, 953 A.2d 241 (Del. 2008) 30 BASF Corp. v. POSM H Props. P'ship, LP, 09 Civ. 3608, 2009 WL 522721 (Del. Ch. March 3, 2009) 36 Chrysler Corp. v. Chaplake Holdings, Ltd., 822 A.2d 1024 (Del. 2003) 42 Citadel Holding Corp. v. Roven, 603 A.2d 818 (Del. 1992) 50 Dittrick v. Chalfant, 948

at top speed with no brakes in the area where people were working was not sufficient to submit the issue of punitive damages to the jury). See also Chrysler Corp. v. Wohner, 499 So. 2d 823, 824 (Fla. 1986) (crash test did not put automobile manufacturer on notice of fuel system defects and did not provide manu