Epstein Secrets

East Las Olas Boulevard Suite 1650 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 April 15. 2009 Re: . v. Jeffrey Epstein Re No. 502008CA028051XXXXMB AD Jane Doe (S.R.) v. Jeffrey Epstein Case No. 08-CV-80893-MarralJohnson Dear Brad: ADELQUI J. BENAVENTE PARALEGAL/ INVESTIGATOR BARBARA M. McKENNA ASHLIE STOKEN

d to my client, the "new" due date is now on May 16, 2009. . With regard to ., the Plaintiff's Expert Witness' Interrogatories, First Request for Admissions, First et of Interrogatories and First Request for Production were served on March 20th, therefore with 5 days for mailing in state court including

ormation), I represented four victims of Epstein's sex offenses in Federal Court — Jane Doe No. 1, Jane Doe No. 2, and a victim I will refer to as "S.R." and "M.J.", and other victims of Jeffrey Epstein's abuse as well. If further information is disclosed about this case, that will not discourage the

ness address. However, I did not have any direct way of contradicting sworn statement. Since then, however, in answering the victims' Requests for Admissions, the Government has admitted that it possesses information that learned confidential, non-public information about the Epstein case and that he di

in Jane Does 2-7: 0.30 hr $90.00 Motion to Compel, deadlines 03/03/2009 RI-IB Draft Motion for Extension of Time to file Motion to Compel Jane (S.R.) 0.25hr $75.00 03/03/2009 RHB Review Motion for Rehearing re: discovery, employment history; legal research; revise otion 1.20 hr $360.00 03

E 0.50 hr $250.00 03/26/2009 RDC Receipt and review Doe (Fed) First Interrogatories; First Request to Produce; 1st 0.30hr $150.00 Request for Admissions 03/26/2009 RHB Conference with RDC. EW, and LM regarding Motions to Dismiss; SR/JD no private c/a 0.20 hr $60.00 03/26/2009 RHB Legal resear

ormation), I represented four victims of Epstein's sex offenses in Federal Court — Jane Doe No. 1, Jane Doe No. 2, and a victim I will refer to as "S.R." and "M.J.", and other victims of Jeffrey Epstein's abuse as well. If further information is disclosed about this case, that will not discourage the

ss. However, I did not have any direct way of contradicting Reinhart's sworn statement. Since then, however, in answering the victims' Requests for Admissions, the Government has admitted that it possesses information that Reinhart learned confidential, non-public information about the Epstein case and th

ormation), I represented four victims of Epstein's sex offenses in Federal Court — Jane Doe No. 1, Jane Doe No. 2, and a victim I will refer to as "S.R." and "M.J.", and other victims of Jeffrey Epstein's abuse as well. If further information is disclosed about this case, that will not discourage the

ss. However, I did not have any direct way of contradicting Reinhart's sworn statement. Since then, however, in answering the victims' Requests for Admissions, the Government has admitted that it possesses information that Reinhart learned confidential, non-public information about the Epstein case and th

and from the FBI's Victim-Witness Specialist. Attached hereto arc copies of the letters provided to Bradley Edwards' three clients, T.M.. C.W., and S.R.' Your Affiant's letter to C.W. was provided by the FBI. (Ex. I ). Your Affiant's letter to T.M. was hand-delivered by myself to T.M. at the time tha

ss. However, I did not have any direct way of contradicting Reinhart's sworn statement. Since then, however, in answering the victims' Requests for Admissions, the Government has admitted that it possesses information that Reinhart learned confidential, non-public information about the Epstein case and th