Epstein Secrets

with resolving the case against Epstein. In November and December 2006, subpoenas were served on two other Epstein employees — Janusz Banasiak and Mucinska. Both initially asked for immunity. After speaking with Banasiak's attorney, Mr. Banasiak was satisfied with I standard Kastigar letter, but Ms. Muc

email from Jeff that said, "Hold the letter" (Exhibit B-54). On December 10, 2007, I contacted Jim Eisenberg, counsel for Individual # 28, who is Jane Doe #2 in the Jane Doe'. United States suit. As noted on the attached chart, Mr. Eisenberg was paid for by Mr. Epstein. I told Mr. Eisenberg that I was

ad been identified in the state investigation), alleging violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act. The suit, which is still pending, is captioned Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 21 United States, 08-80736-CV-KAM. Page 3 of 58 EFTA00225046 set aside the NPA and see Mr. Epstein federally charged due to violatio

a aboard the Gulfstream aircraft owned by Hyperion Air, Inc. (222) On or about August 18, 2005, Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN, ADRIANA ROSS, a/k/a "A Mucinska," and NADIA MARCINKOVA traveled from Teterboro, New Jersey to Palm Beach County, Florida aboard the Gulfstream aircraft owned by Hyperion Air, Inc.

ard the Gulfstream aircraft owned by Hyperion Air, Inc. (216) On or about March 4, 2005, Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN, ADRIANA ROSS, a/k/a "Adrl@rta Mucinska," and NADIA MARCINKOVA traveled from New York, New York to Palm Beach County, Florida aboard the Boeing 727 aircraft owned by JEGE, INC. (217) On

ied female in the presence of Jane Doe #2, who was then a fourteen- year-old girl. 17 (8) In or around 2001, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN paid $300 to Jane Doe #2, who was then a fourteen-year-old girl, for allowing an unidentified female to perform oral sex on Jane Doe #2 in EPSTEIN's presence. (9) On or

I Lawrence Paul Visoski,Jr. Duces Tecum 10/8/09,10:00.am Esquire Court Rep 515 N. Flagler Dr. WPB, FL Edwards, Ezell Kuvin Doe101, 102, . Mucinska 10/8/09,4:00 p.m. Esquire Court Rep 1021 Ives DairyRd. Suite 214,BIdg.3 North Miami, FL Edwards, Ezell Kuvin Doe 101, 102, . 10/13/0910:OOam

Doe, , EW By Video (OFF) Juan Alessi By Video 9/08/09,10:00am Searcy Denney 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL JPH Doe #4 Jane Doe #4 * By Video a ) 9/16/09,1:OOpm Our Office Our Office Igor Zinoview 9/17/09,10:00am Doerner & Goldberg Revmont Park, South Building 1161

he grand jury what information will be on those records? A It will be telephonic contact between Sarah Kellen, Nadia Marcinkova, Adriana Ross or Mucinska, telephonic contact between his assistants and the Jane Does. OFFICIAL REPORTING SERVICE, LLC (954) 467-8204 EFTA00179318 19 1 2 3 4 5 6

9 20 21 22 23 24 25 attended Palm Beach Central High School. I should state that all of these high schools are located in Palm Beach County. Jane Doe Number Seven attended William T. Dwyer High School in Palm Beach County. Jane Doe Numbers Nine, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, and 19 attended Royal Palm Bea

tached as Exhibit 24). Indeed, going a step further, on October 8, 2009, Epstein took the Fifth when asked whether he even knew Dershowitz was a 38 Mucinska also took the Fifth when asked about the involvement of Prince Andrew, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Jean Luc Brunel. id. at 37:3, 85:12, 85:13. 32 EFTA0

court in Doe'. Epstein, No. 9:08- cv-80I19-KAM (S.D. Fla.). Brunel's attorney asked counsel for Jane Doe to postpone the scheduled deposition date. Jane Doe's counsel agreed, and then Brunel's attorney cancelled the rescheduled deposition date. Brunel's counsel represented that Brunel was outside the count

tached as Exhibit 24). Indeed, going a step further, on October 8, 2009, Epstein took the Fifth when asked whether he even knew Dershowitz was a 28 Mucinska also took the Fifth when asked about the involvement of Prince Andrew, Ghislaine Maxwell. and Jcan Luc Brunel. Id. at 37:3, 85:12, 85:13. 32 EFTA0

S OF AMERICA. Respondent. / PLAINTIFFS RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR LIMITED INTERVENTION BY ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ COME NOW petitioners Jane Doe No. I and Jane Doe 2, as well as rnavants Jane Doe No. 3 and Jane Doe No. 4 ("the victims" I), to respond in opposition to Mr. Dershowitz's motion for limited intervent

ut what I discovered there was that when sarah Kellen was asked about Alan Dershowitz, she took the Fifth and she wasn't the only one. There was Miss Mucinska who also took the Fifth when asked questions about Alan Dershowitz. And then there was Marcin -- Miss Marcinkova who also took the Fifth. So what we

SIGHT_021839 Oo O DN OO FF WwW NY =| NO RO PO PNP NM NO | S| S| HS SF S| S| S| S| S| non BP WO NO -|- ODO OO WDN OO OT BP WO NYO — 17 in the case Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 versus the United States. This is number 2. (4 Plaintiff's * Defendant's I.D. Exhibit No. 2 - “ description was marked for identifica

ach County, Florida aboard the Gulfstream aircraft owned by Hyperion Air, Inc. (223) On or about September 3, 2005, Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN and Mucinska," traveled from the U.S. Virgin Islands j • to Palm Beach County, Florida aboard th Gulfstream aircraft owned by Hyperion Air, Inc. (224) On or a

female in the presence of Jane Doe #2, who was then a fourteen- .; ;. year-old girl. (8) In or around 2001, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN paid $300 to Jane Doe #2, who was then a fourteen-year-old girl, for allowing an unidentified female to perform oral sex on Jane Doe #2 in EPSTEIN's presence. (9) On or

2423(b) and 2. FORFEITURE 1 Upon conviction of the violation alleged in Count I of this indictment, the defendants, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, SARAH KELFN, Mucinska," and , shall forfeit to the United States any property, real or personal, which constitutes or is derived from proceeds traceable to the violation

.S.C. § 1591(c)(1): Count Date(s) Minor Involved Defendant(s) 2 2001 - 2004 Jane Doe #2 JEFFREY EPSTEIN 3 January 2004 through July 2004 Jane Doe F JEFFREY EPSTEIN SARAH KELLEN 4 July 2004 through December 29, Jane Doe #9 JEFFREY EPSTEIN SARAH KELLEN 38 EFTA00225746 New Jersey to Palm

asiak Both initially asked for immunity. After speaking with Banasiak's attorney, r. anasi was satisfied with a standard Kastigar letter, but Ms. Mucinska's attorney was insistent on formal immunity, and as noted above, so was Individual #28. I don't believe that, prior to this investigation, I had ev

Department's Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) arising out of a decision by United States District Judge Kenneth A. Marra in the matter of Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2I United States, S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra; (3) the materials are needed to avoid an injustice in another proceeding, th