Epstein Secrets

t reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 05440-05441 04/01/2009 Bradley Edwards Carolyn (Legal Asst. to Jay Howell, Co- Counsel) CW Personal information Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably

calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 05197.05199 08/24/2009 Attorneys at RRA Ken Jenne Michael Reiter info Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; pr

08/24/2009 Attorneys at RRA Ken Jenne Michael Reiter info Work product; attorney/client privilege;

t reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 05440-05441 04/01/2009 Bradley Edwards Carolyn (Legal Asst. to Jay Howell, Co- Counsel) CW Personal information Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably

calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 05197-05199 08/24/2009 Attorneys at RRA Ken Jenne Michael Reiter info Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; pr

08/24/2009 Attorneys at RRA Ken Jenne Michael Reiter info Work product; attorney/client privilege;

xhibits as well, That will save us some time. MR. SCOTT: What is this? MR. SCAROLA: Her calendar, his calendar. MR. SCOTT: Who's calendar is this, Carolyn's? MR. SCAROLA: Okay. This is Number 10. MR. SCOTT: Carolyn's calendar. (Thereupon, marked as Plaintiff Exhibit 10.) MR. SCAROLA: This is Number

this point -- I don't mean to distract you, but | think the record would be more complete if [ indicated that I did get a phone eall last night from Michael, who told me that he had received numerous phone calls and texts from Virginia Roberts trying to persuade her not to talk to me or cooperate with me

pletely exonerate me. And if your clients had just called me, at the courtesy of simply calling me, I would have been able to point them to Professor Michael Porter of the Harvard Business fo On HM fF WN NNN NNN EH HM eB bb pp pp ob WN FO @ ON A MB WN HO A. Where? Where? Can you point to that? BY MR. SCAROLA:

el V) Fankhauser, Larry (So Cnty) Flinn, Charlene (Fel R) Fang, Kaaren-Ann (DOVE) Feibusch, Robyn (CAC) Foistmann, Ettie (Juv M) Femandez, Carolyn (Belle Glade) Feels, Leonard (Fel V) Ford, Pamela CC) Forsyth, Allison (Eco Crime) Fox, Virginia Juv M) Fraser, William (CC) Frederick, Rita

me he would face was solicitation of prostitution_ That was a source of great consternation to Chief to protest to State Attorney Barry Krischer. Reiter believed a strong case had been made that Epstein had sex with children We've learned dogged investigators didn't let the case go. and Epstein's att

mber of the police interviews, the naive young girls believed they would be paid only for "massaging an old white guy." But Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiter developed a disgust for what he believed to be preferential treatment given to wealthy Epstein in the investigation and had called in the FBI. Acc

again and again and again."), 2901 ("Four women have testified at this trial about Maxwell. They all describe the same woman, the same playbook."). Carolyn was the only witness who testified regarding Count Five. The Government argued that her testimony "was corroborated by what Annie an old [the jury

ngle touchstone" determines whether two allegedly distinct conspiracies "'appear in fact and in law the same." Id. at 668 (quoting United States v. Reiter, 848 F.2d 336, 340 (2d Cir. 1988)). Moreover, "the Korfant list is not exhaustive, and every case must be assessed on its own terms . . . based on t