Epstein Secrets

5/05/2010) 538 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Kenneth A. Marra: Status Conference held on 5/6/2010. Adam Horowitz, Bradley Edwards, Katherine Ezell f r PI in iff nd Michael Pike, Robert Critton for Defendant. Court Reporter: Stephen Franklin, [email protected] (ir) (Entered: 05

Entered: 07/06/2009) 189 ORDER granting 186 Motion for Extension of Time to Reply. Defendant has until July 14, 2009 to file a Reply to Plaintiffs Jane Doe's 2-7 Response to Defendant's Motion to Compel Identity.. Signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on 7/6/2009. (mkz) (Entered: 07/06/2009) Set/Reset Deadlin

Declarations of Jane Doe No. 4 and Y.B. in Further Support of Plaintiffs' Jane Does 2-7 Motion for Protective Order (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Jane Doe 4, # 2 Declaration of Y.B.)(Mermelstein. Stuart) (Entered: 08/14/2009) 268 Sealed Document (rb) (Entered: 08/14/2009) 269 Unopposed MOTION for Exte

for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Defendant's Motions for Summary Judgment (Jane Doe 2, DE 539; Jane Doe 3 DE 141; Jane Doe 4, DE 157; Jane Doe 5, DE 139; Jane Doe 6, DE 91; Jane Doe 7, DE 107) by Jane Doe. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Horowitz, Adam) (Entered: 06/01/2010) 554 O

confidentiality provision that require[ed] us to inform Mr. Epstein's counsel before making any disclosure.s170 154. On September 18, 2008, attorney Katherine Ezell representing some of Epstein's victims emailed the line prosecutor, asking whether the NPA was "blessed" by Judge Marra. The line prosecutor emaile

Document 361 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 1 of 57 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 9:08-cv-80736-KAM JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, UNITED STATES, Respondent. JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2'S CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS AND MOTI

m letter to Jane Doe 5 also acknowledged the victims' rights under the CVRA at the same time as the Office was not disclosing the NPA's existence to Jane Doe 5 and the other victiim."6 101. In mid-June 2008, Mr. Edwards contacted the line AUSA handling the case to inform her that he represented Jane Doe 1 a

Nothing shall prohibit Second Parties from conducting his defense, investigation and trial as his lawyers deems appropriate. Robert Josefsberg and Katherine Ezell are hereby deemed to have full authority to accept a subpoena on First Parties behalf, so as EFTA00609405 not to violate the No-Contact order. I

RICO SPICIAL ONSVMER JUSTICE COVNSEt As per our discussion on September 251h followed by your e-mail and my e-mail, we are res • Jane Doe 101, Jane Doe 102 and all of your other clients, except for We have also agreed as part of the above settlement to certain additional terms, although it will not

ohibit Second Parties from conducting Jeffrey Epstein's defense, investigation, and trial(s) as his lawyers deem appropriate. Robert Josefsberg and Katherine Ezell are hereby deemed to have full authority to accept a subpoena from Second Parties on behalf, so that Second Parties are not in violation of the te

esolve the pending litigation between them as follows: 1. Dismissal. The Parties agree to immediately dismiss the pending lawsuit presently styled Jane Doe No. 102 vs. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 09-80656-CIV- Marra/Johnson (Southern District of Florida), with prejudice upon payment and clearance of the

embers of the Parties (whose identities must be provided as "Eyes Only" to D. Critton, Jr. for Jeffrey Epstein's disclosures, and to Josefsberg or Katherine Ezell for disclosures, in a sealed envelope to be opened only if a third party is alleged to have breached this provision); (b) to the extent required b

esolve the pending litigation between them as follows: 1. Dismissal. The Parties agree to immediately dismiss the pending lawsuit presently styled Jane Doe No. 103 vs. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 10-80309-CIV- Marraal (Southern District of Florida), with prejudice upon payment and clearance of the settl

lity provision that require[ed] us to inform Mr. Epstein's counsel before making any disclosure." Id. at 46, 1 153. On September 18, 2008, attorney Katherine Ezell representing some of Epstein's victims emailed the line prosecutor, asking whether the NPA was "blessed" by Judge Marra. The line prosecutor emaile

DE 361 at 8, 1 1. Because Epstein and his co-conspirators knowingly traveled in interstate and international commerce to sexually abuse Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2, and other similarly situated victims, they committed violations of not only Florida law see, e.g., Ha. Stat. §§ 794.05, 796.04, 796.045, 39.201 & 7

ecution of the contract, and there is no need for further delay. As far as the five attorney names that we will be providing, I propose Bert Ocariz, Katherine Ezell at Podhurst Orseck, Stuart Grossman, Ed Rogers, and Walter Cobath. If you would like to use the same Special Master to resolve fees disputes as well

012635 TAB 32 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012636 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 20069 " JANE DOE NO. 1, by and through JANE DOE’s FATHER as parent and natural guardian, and JANE DOR’s FATHER, and . . JANE DOE’s STEPMOTHER, individually, ciV-MA RRA Plaintiffs, MAGISTRATE JUDGH

Was it through an employment agency -- A. No. Q. -- or an ad in the paper? A. I had a company at that time used to take care Page 6 1 MS. EZELL: Katherine Ezell from Podhurst 2 Orseck, on behalf of Jane Does 101 and 102. 3 MR. CRITTON: Bob Griffon, on behalf of 4 Jeffrey Epstein. 5 THEREUPON, 6 JUAN

frey Epstein, defendant. CMA, plaintiff, versus Jeffrey Epstein, defendant. And Jane Doe, plaintiff, versus Jeffrey Epstein, et al, defendant. And Jane Doe -- is there a shorter thing that we can do here? It's also missing this one right here. MR. MERMELSTEIN: Do we have a problem with saying Jane Do

5/06/2010 538 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Kenneth A. Marra: Status Conference held on 5/6/2010. Adam Horowitz, Bradley Edwards. Katherine Ezell for Plaintiff and Michael Pike, Robert Critton for Defendant. Court Reporter: Stephen Franklin. 561-514-3768 / [email protected] (i

MOTION to Compel Response to 1st RTP and 1st Interrogs filed by C.M.A.. (Hill. Jack) (Entered: 04/20/2009) 04/22/2009 63 MOTION for Leave to File Jane Doe's No. 101's Motion For Leave to File Brief as Amicus Curiae in Support of Plaintiff's Response in Opposition to Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to