Epstein Secrets

ecution of the contract, and there is no need for further delay. As far as the five attorney names that we will be providing, I propose Bert Ocariz, Katherine Ezell at Podhurst Orseck, Stuart Grossman, Ed Rogers, and Walter Cobath. If you would like to use the same Special Master to resolve fees disputes as well

contact the sender by reply E-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. Thank you. “= Message from "A. on Fri, ----- To: "Lilly Subject: Menchel Dear Lilly: Thank you for your letter of August 2nd regarding your proposal on how to resolve the Epstein matter. ‘ As we explained at our meeting on

al interest, and, at this time, he is not inclined to meet with counsel for Mr. Epstein. Sincerely, R. Alexander Acosta United States Attorney By: Matthew Menchel — Chief, Criminal Division cc: Roy Black Gerald Lefcourt R. Alexander Acosta Jeffrey Sloman Andrew Lourie A. Marie Villafafia Margot Moss, Esq.

confidentiality provision that require[ed] us to inform Mr. Epstein's counsel before making any disclosure."170 154. On September 18, 2008, attorney Katherine Ezell representing some of Epstein's victims emailed the line prosecutor, asking whether the NPA was "blessed" by Judge Marra. The line prosecutor emaile

sentiments.' 17. However, by August 3, 2007, the Government had disproven or rejected Epstein's various arguments against federal charges, as AUSA Matt Menchel sent a letter to Epstein's counsel stating, "[w]e would reiterate that the agreement to Section 2255 liability applies to all of the minor girls id

her delay. As far as the five attorney names providing, I propose Bert Ocariz, Podhurst Orseck, Stuart Grossman, Walter Cobath. that we will be Katherine Ezell at Ed Rogers, and If you would like to use the same Special Master to resolve fees disputes as well as to handle the selection of the attorney, I

n to use "a" versus "the" and other minutiae. When you and I could not reach agreement, you repeatedly went over my head, involving Messrs. Lourie, Menchel, Sloman, and Acosta in the negotiations at various times. In any and all plea negotiations the defendant understands that his options are to plead

confidentiality provision that require[ed] us to inform Mr. Epstein's counsel before making any disclosure."170 154. On September 18, 2008, attorney Katherine Ezell representing some of Epstein's victims emailed the line prosecutor, asking whether the NPA was "blessed" by Judge Marra. The line prosecutor emaile

sentiments.' 17. However, by August 3, 2007, the Government had disproven or rejected Epstein's various arguments against federal charges, as AUSA Matt Menchel sent a letter to Epstein's counsel stating, "[w]e would reiterate that the agreement to Section 2255 liability applies to all of the minor girls id