Epstein Secrets

Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards Marc S. Nurik Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein Jack A. Goldberger Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400 West

ection as to grand jury materials). Exhibit B, at 36 n.13. Epstein also files as Exhibit C the August 4, 2010, hearing transcript; In re Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A., United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Florida, Case No. 09- 34791-BKC-RBR, The following are statements made by William Scherer

mplaint demonstrates his reliance upon such a report from a single credible victim or eyewitness sufficient to demonstrate for probable cause: "Ft. Lauderdale attorney William Scherer represents multiple Rothstein related investors. He indicated in an article that RRA/Rothstein had used "the Epstein ploy .

egedly misused. See Deposition Transcript of Bradley Edwards dated March 23, 2010; Deposition Transcripts of Scott W. Rothstein in In re: Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, PA; 09-34791-RBR and Razorback Funding, LLC, et al. v. Scott W. Rothstein, et al., Case No. 09-062943(19). 5 EFTA00799343 July 22, 2009 from Ed

ow potential defendants could be in essence blackmailed into paying settlement that far exceeded the value of any legitimate damage claim. 20. Ft. Lauderdale attorney William Scherer represents multiple Rothstein related investors. He indicated in an article that RRA/Rothstein had used the "Epstein Ploy .

t November 11, 2009, contained the approximate amount of $10,085.00; (BA11)Toronto Dominion Bank, N.A. account 6860420923 in the name of Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A, Attorney Trust Account 3, which, on or about November 11, 2009, contained the approximate amount of $720,892.08; (BAl2)Toronto Dominion Bank,

and is more particularly described as: OPTIMA VILLAGE l-"C" CONDO UNIT 201 BLDG 2 with a Folio Number of 4941 31 AC 0110; (RP11) 227 Garden Court, Lauderdale by the Sea, Florida, hereafter also referred to as "Defendant RP11," includes that portion of the buildings, improvements, fixtures, 20 EFTA006831

t November 11, 2009, contained the approximate amount of $10,085.00; (BA11)Toronto Dominion Bank, N.A. account 6860420923 in the name of Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A. Attorney Trust Account 3, which, on or about November 11, 2009, contained the approximate amount of $720,892.08; (BAl2)Toronto Dominion Bank,

ow potential defendants could be in essence blackmailed into paying settlement that far exceeded the value of any legitimate damage claim. 20. Ft. Lauderdale attorney William Scherer represents multiple Rothstein related investors. He indicated in an article that RRA/Rothstein had used the "Epstein Ploy .

t November 11, 2009, contained the approximate amount of $10,085.00; (BA11)Toronto Dominion Bank, N.A. account 6860420923 in the name of Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P. A, Attorney Trust Account 3, which, on or about November 11, 2009, contained the approximate amount of $720,892.08; (BA12)Toronto Dominion Bank

t Palm Beach, FL 33401 William J. Berger, Esq. Bradley .). Edwards, Esq. Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler 401 East Las Olas Boulevard., Suite 1650 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33394 Robert D. Critton, Esq. Burman, Critton, Luther & Coleman 515 North Flagler Drive, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 lack A. Goldber

tervene and Petition for Access to certain court records in this case. It is our understanding that Bradley Edwards and William Berger of Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler have filed a similar motion on behalf of a non-party known as "E.W.," and that E.W.'s motion is set for hearing on June 10, 2009. The Post requests

mplaint demonstrates his reliance upon such a report from a single credible victim or eyewitness sufficient to demonstrate for probable cause: "Ft. Lauderdale attorney William Scherer represents multiple Rothstein related investors. He indicated in an article that RRA/Rothstein had used "the Epstein ploy .

ly needed to keep the Ponzi Scheme from unraveling. [Cite Razorback and media reports]; Depositions taken of Scott W. Rothstein in In re: Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, PA; 09-34791-RBR. The court confirmed that there was no legitimate basis for filing Edwards' motion, calling it "devoid of evidence." See Order in

[email protected] 20 EFTA00584551 Tonja Haddad Coleman Florida Bar No. 0176737 TONJA HADDAD, P.A. 5315 S.E. Seventh Street, Suite 301 Ft. Lauderdale Florida 33301 Jack A. Goldberger Florida Bar No. 262013 ATTERBURY, GOLDBERGER & WEISS, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400 West Palm Beach

ely existed to serve another master, a sinister Ponzi scheme that operated out of Edwards's and co-defendant Scott Rothstein's law firm, Rothstein, Rosenfeldt Adler. As is now well-known, at that law firm, despite what its name implies, the main business was the creation and perpetration of a Ponzi scheme that

, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 William Berger, Esq. Attorney For: E. W. Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler 401 E. Las Olas Blvd., Suite 1650 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33394 Florida Bar No. 624489 4 EFTA00193925 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida S00 South Aust

t November 11, 2009, contained the approximate amount of $10,085.00; (BA11)Toronto Dominion Bank, N.A. account 6860420923 in the name of Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A, Attorney Trust Account 3, which, on or about November 11, 2009, contained the approximate amount of $720,892.08; (BA12)Toronto Dominion Bank,

ow potential defendants could be in essence blackmailed into paying settlement that far exceeded the value of any legitimate damage claim. 20. Ft. Lauderdale attorney William Scherer represents multiple Rothstein related investors. He indicated in an article that RRA/Rothstein had used the "Epstein. Ploy

November 11, 2009, contained the approximate amount of $10,085.00; (33A11)Toronto Dominion Bank, N.A. account 6860420923 in the name of Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A, Attorney Trust Account 3, which, on or about November 11, ' 2009, contained the approximate amount of $720,892.08; (BA12)Toronto Dominion Ban