Epstein Secrets

's designee also have authority to grant requests for a stay during the pendency of a proceeding and a thirty-day stay of mandate pending review by the United States Supreme Court in order to allow counsel the opportunity to obtain a stay from that Court. Motions filed after a case has been assigned to a justice are ruled on

. Cases Affecting Children. It is the policy of the Court to expedite proceedings presenting time-sensitive issues affecting children. Pursuant to Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.145 and 9.146, in all cases involving juvenile delinquency, dependency, or termination of parental rights, the file shall remain sealed

eeding which itself is protected by Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e) remains non-public, thus effectuating the privacy concerns addressed by the United States Supreme Court in Douglas and other cases. See e.g. Douglas Oil Co. v. Petrol Stops Northwest, 441 U.S. 211, 228-30 (1979). Under Rule 6(e), only a federal court

are produced, there will be no adequate remedy. I. JURISDICTION Mr. Epstein seeks to invoke the certiorari jurisdiction of this Court pursuant to Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.030(bX2XA) and 9.100. Certiorari review is appropriate where, as here, an order unsealing a court record departs from the essential req

eeding which itself is protected by Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e) remains non-public, thus effectuating the privacy concerns addressed by the United States Supreme Court in Douglas and other cases. See e.g. Douglas Oil Co. v. Petrol Stops Northwest, 441 U.S. 211, 228-30 (1979). Under Rule 6(e), only a federal court

are produced, there will be no adequate remedy. L JURISDICTION Mr. Epstein seeks to invoke the certiorari jurisdiction of this Court pursuant to Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.030(bX2XA) and 9.100. Certiorari review is appropriate where, as here, an order unsealing a court record departs from the essential req

eeding which itself is protected by Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e) remains non-public, thus effectuating the privacy concerns addressed by the United States Supreme Court in Douglas and other cases. See e.g, Douglas Oil Co. v. Petrol Stops Northwest, 441 U.S. 211, 228-30 (1979). Under Rule 6(e), only a federal court

are produced, there will be no adequate remedy. I. JURISDICTION Mr. Epstein seeks to invoke the certiorari jurisdiction of this Court pursuant to Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.030(bX2)(A) and 9.100. Certiorari review is appropriate where, as here, an order unsealing a court record departs from the essential re

eeding which itself is protected by Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e) remains non-public, thus effectuating the privacy concerns addressed by the United States Supreme Court in Douglas and other cases. See a Douglas Oil Co. v. Petrol Stops Northwest, 441 U.S. 211, 228-30 (1979). Under Rule 6(e), only a federal court can

are produced, there will be no adequate remedy. I. JURISDICTION Mr. Epstein seeks to invoke the certiorari jurisdiction of this Court pursuant to Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.030(bX2)(A) and 9.100. Certiorari review is appropriate where, as here, an order unsealing a court record departs from the essential re