Epstein Secrets

ion testimony. An analogy can be made to cases involving impermissibly suggestive showups.3 See e.g. Neil v. Biggers, 409 U.S. 188 (1972). In Neil, the United States Supreme Court, addressing suggestive showups, noted that the primary evil to be avoided is a very substantial likelihood of irreparable misidentification." Id. a

YE, J. MICHAEL BURMAN. PAN GREGORY W. COLEMAN. PA. ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR. P.A. BERNARD LESEDEKER. MARK T. LL/TTIER. P.A. JEFFREY C. PEPIN MICHAEL J. PIKE HEATHER. M

te, Defendant's position as to the meaning of the statute would prevail. See United States'. Santos 128 S.Ct. 2020, 2025 (2008). As summarized by the United States Supreme Court in Santos, supra, at 2025: 5 See argument in sections (2) and (3) that follow which represent the predicate for the rule of lenity issue discussed

Black. Srebnick. Komspan & Stumpf. PA EFTA00194769 BURMAN, CRITTON LUTTIER&COLEMAN,ar YOUR TRUSTED ADVOCATES A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP J. MICHAEL BURMAN. PAP GREGORY W. COLEMAN. P.A. ROBERT D. CRITEON. JR. PA' BERNARD A. LEBEDEKER MARK T. LUTEIER. PA- MICHAEL ). PIKE DAVID A. YAREMA if LOIUDA WA

, Defendant's position as to the meaning of the statute would prevail. See United Statcs I. Santos, 128 S.Ct. 2020, 2025 (2008). As summarized by the United States Supreme Court in Santos, supra, at 2025: See argument in sections (2) and (3) that follow which represent the predicate for the rule of lenity issue discussed in

ack. Srebnick, Kornspan & Stumpf. PA EFTA00183815 BURMAN, CRITTON LUTTIER&COLEMAN, LLP YOUR TRUSTED ADVOCATES A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP J. MICHAEL BURMAN. P.A22 GREGORY W. COLEMAN. P.A. ROBERT D. CRITTON. JP-. PA ' BERNARD A. LEBEDEKER MARKT. LuTTIER. PA. MICHAEL J. PIKE DAVID A. YAREMA RONDA BOA