Epstein Secrets

n and freeze them so that they may be preserved to satisfy a potential judgment." Id. at 1527. The court went on to cite an oft- quoted passage from the United States Supreme Court in De Beers Consol. Mines, Ltd. v. United States, 325 U.S. 212, 221 (1945): To sustain the challenged order would create a precedent of sweeping e

Vice 332 South 1400 E, Room 101 Salt Lake City, UT 84112 801-585-5202 801-585-6833 Fax [email protected] Co-counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe Isidro M. Garcia, Esq. Garcia Law Firm, P.A. 224 Datura Street, Suite 900 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561-832-7732 561-832-7137 F [email protected] Coun

e others third-party privacy rights. As noted by the United States Supreme Court in Eisenstadt v. Baird, 405 U.S. 438, 454, 92 S.C

nsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08- 08804 Isidro M. Garcia, Esq. Garcia Law Firm, P.A. 224 Datura Street,

designed to guarantee." Hoffman, 341 U.S. at 479. The United States Supreme Court has made clear that the scope of the Fifth Amend

@Jaw.utah.edu Co-counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe Isidro M. Garcia, Esq. Garcia Law Firm, P.A. 224 Datura Street,

tered on FLSD Docket 11/02/2009 Page 10 of 24 4 The United States Supreme Court has expressly encompassed the innocent citizen as

@law.utah.edu Co-counsel for Plaint/ff Jane Doe Isidro M. Garcia, Esq. Garcia Law Firm, P.A. 224 Datura Street,

ein to walk a thin line with regard to "surrender[ing] the very protection which the privilege is designed to guarantee." Hoffman, 341 U.S. at 479. The United States Supreme Court has made clear that the scope of the Fifth Amendment Privilege also encompasses the 10 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 391 Entered on FLSD D

ce 332 South 1400 E, Room 101 Salt Lake City, UT 84 I 12 801-585-5202 801-585-6833 Fax [email protected] Co-counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe Isidro M. Garcia, Esq. Garcia Law Firm, P.A. 224 Datura Street, Suite 900 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561-832-7732 561-832-7137 F [email protected] Coun

in the development of other incriminating evidence that can be used at trial. Id; Pillsbury Company v. Conboy, 495 U.S. 248, 103 S.Ct. 608 (1983). The United States Supreme Court has made clear that the scope of the Fifth Amendment Privilege includes the circumstances as here "the act of producing documents in response to a

Vice 332 South 1400 E, Room 101 Salt Lake City, UT 84112 801-585-5202 801-585-6833 Fax [email protected] Co-counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe Isidro M. Garcia, Esq. Garcia Law Firm, P.A. 224 Datura Street, Suite 900 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561-832-7732 561-832-7137 F [email protected] Coun

ess there is compliance with the applicable provisions. The procedure is mandatory and governs state and federal proceedings and has been upheld in the United States Supreme Court, See U.S. ex rel, Iouhv v. gaze% 340 U.S. 462 (1951). In addition, the Privacy Act (Title S, U.S.C., Section 552a(b), prohibits the release of age

Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. jgoldbergerfaagwoa.com Robert D. Critton, Esq. rcrittonebelclaw.com Bradley James Edwards brad(a),pathlojustice.com Isidro Manuel Garcia isidrozarciaa,bellsouth.nct Jack Patrick Hill inhesearcvlaw.com Katherine Warthen Ezell KEzellQpodhurst.com Michael James Pike [email protected]

ion and freeze them so that they may be preserved to satisfy a potential judgment." a at 1527. The court went on to cite an oft- quoted passage from the United States Supreme Court in De Beers Consol. Mines, Ltd. v. United States, 325 U.S. 212, 221 (1945): To sustain the challenged order would create a precedent of sweeping e

sq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, Counsel for Plaintiff C.M.A. Pro Hac Vice [email protected] Co-counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe Isidro M. Garcia, Esq. Garcia Law Firm, P.A. Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-80469 Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. Katherine W. Ezell, Esq. Podhurst Ors