Epstein Secrets

tered on FLSD Docket 11/02/2009 Page 10 of 24 4 The United States Supreme Court has expressly encompassed the innocent citizen as

against being required to produce and/or testify. Rudy-Glanzer v. Glanzer, 232 F.3d 1258, 1263 (9th Cir

n and freeze them so that they may be preserved to satisfy a potential judgment." Id. at 1527. The court went on to cite an oft- quoted passage from the United States Supreme Court in De Beers Consol. Mines, Ltd. v. United States, 325 U.S. 212, 221 (1945): To sustain the challenged order would create a precedent of sweeping e

ndant's actions," citing Unique Caterers, Inc. v. Rudy's Farm Co., 338 So. 2d 1067, 1071 (Fla. 1976))

e others third-party privacy rights. As noted by the United States Supreme Court in Eisenstadt v. Baird, 405 U.S. 438, 454, 92 S.C

against being required to produce and/or testify. Rudy-Glanzer v. Glanzer, 232 F.3d 1258, 1263 (9th Cir