Epstein Secrets

jective for Epstein, but if they're satisfied with that language, that's fine. As long as the victims know there is an agreement between Epstein and the U.S. Government, I believe we have complied with Judge Marra's order. Dexter From: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 12:19 PM T

r attorney to represent her in the context of civil litigation, that attorney can review the Court's order in the matter of In re Jane Does I and 2, S.D. Fl. Court File No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA, and advise her accordingly." What do you think? This was my original language: "In addition, a judge has order

jective for Epstein, but if they're satisfied with that language, that's fine. As long as the victims know there is an agreement between Epstein and the U.S. Government, I believe we have complied with Judge Marra's order. Dexter From: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 12:19 PM T

r attorney to represent her in the context of civil litigation, that attorney can review the Court's order in the matter of In re Jane Does 1 and 2, S.D. Fl. Court File No. 08-80736-C1V-MARRA, and advise her accordingly." What do you think? This was my original language: "In addition, a judge has order

ective for Epstein, but if they're satisfied with that language, that's fine. As long as the victims know there is an agreement between Epstein and the U.S. Government, I believe we have complied with Judge Marra's order. Dexter From: Viliafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 12:19 PM To

r attorney to represent her in the context of civil litigation, that attorney can review the Court's order in the matter of In re Jane Does 1 and 2, S.D. Fl. Court File No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA, and advise her accordingly." What do you think? This was my original language: "In addition, a judge has order

ective for Epstein, but if they're satisfied with that language, that's fine. As long as the victims know there is an agreement between Epstein and the U.S. Government, I believe we have complied with Judge Marra's order. Dexter From: Vlllafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 12:19 PM To

r attorney to represent her in the context of civil litigation, that attorney can review the Court's order in the matter of In re Jane Does 1 and 2, S.D. Fl. Court File No. 08-80736-C1V-MARRA, and advise her accordingly." What do you think? This was my original language: "In addition, a judge has order

EBRUARY 2, 2007 PAGE 3 District of Florida. T state that there have been no additional promises or representations ' made to me by any official of the United States Government or by my attorney in connection with this matter. Dated: Witnessed by: James L. Eisenberg, Esquire EFTA00185233 U.S. Department of Justice Au

elled self-incrimination in connection with civil litigation, a court can stay discovery or the entire civil case. Diaz'. Jenne, 2007 WL 624286 al (S.D. Fl. Feb. 23, 2007) (Cooke, J.). "However, 'the Constitution does not require a stay of civil proceedings pending the outcome of related criminal procee