Epstein Secrets

18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Page 4 context with just a little background about how we got here. This action is a civil action. It's pending in Circuit Court up in Palm Beach County. Jeffrey Epstein has sued Mr. Rothstein, individually, and Mr. Edwards, individually, regarding -- the genesis of which wa

you now, I will deal with the disk problem here. The, quote, "ten boxes" in the possession of Mr. Farmer and Mr. Edwards can be dealt with at the State Court level. MR. KNIGHT: Okay. And -- THE COURT: Now, turning to the disk issue, let me hear from Mr. Silver and Mr. Lichtman. MR. LICHTMAN: You go fir

er to us. We will 11 THE COURT: And there is a privilege log 11 file the appropriate privilege log with the 12 and the judge has made a Sing? 12 Circuit Court judge who is presiding over the 13 MR. FARMER: No. The dispute now really is 13 case, who is most familiar with the case, who 14 over who's going

r, your Honor. CHARLES H. LICHTMAN, ESQUIRE 3 I'm William Soberer and Ern here on behalf of a 4 s on OW ref te Thew 4 number of victims in the State Court action, as 6 CONRAD & SCHERER, by $ well as the chairman of the creditors' committee WILLIAM R. SCHERIN, ESQUIRE 6 in the bankruptcy. 7 s or

er to us. We will 11 THE COURT: And there is a privilege log 11 file the appropriate privilege log with the 12 and the judge has made a Sing? 12 Circuit Court judge who is presiding over the 13 MR. FARMER: No. The dispute now really is 13 case, who is most familiar with the case, who 14 over who's going

r, your Honor. CHARLES H. LICHTMAN, ESQUIRE 3 I'm William Soberer and Ern here on behalf of a 4 s on OW ref te Thew 4 number of victims in the State Court action, as 6 CONRAD & SCHERER, by $ well as the chairman of the creditors' committee WILLIAM R. SCHERIN, ESQUIRE 6 in the bankruptcy. 7 s or

to trigger application of section 26.012, Florida Statutes, the statute that establishes the jurisdictional amount required for filing in Florida's Circuit Court (as opposed to County Court). 2 Lewis. 'Lein n. 3059 G.0.90AviNut, Stun 340, COCONW Gotovt, FLOMDA 33133 20340 EFTA00234069 • 'I''• Case 9:08

CCONV? Goon, FLOOOM 33133 4 cot 40 EFTA00234071 • • Case 9:08-cv-80811-WJZ Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/21/2008 Page 5 of 40 5. The State Court docket has been filed. All papers filed in the State Court are attached to this Removal Petition. Conclusion Because this is a civil action betwee

to us. We will 11 THE COURT: And there is a privilege log 11 file the appropriate privilege log with the 12 and the judge has made a ruling? 12 Circuit Court judge who is presiding over the 13 MR. FARMER: No. The dispute now really is 13 case, who is most familiar with the case, who 14 over who's going

, sir, your Honor. CHARLES H. WHOA" ESQUIRE 3 I'm William Scherer and I'm here on behalf of a 4 s on WINIIM Ea Emote 4 number of victims in the State Court action, as 6 CONRAD & SCHEItElt, by $ Wen aS the chairman of the creditors' committee WILLIAM R. SCNEKO, ESQUIRE 6 In the banIcruptiry. 7 s

to trigger application of section 26.012, Florida Statutes, the statute that establishes the jurisdictional amount required for filing in Florida's Circuit Court (as opposed to County Court). 2 Lewis Min PI. 3059 GRANOAVIP44, Sum 340, Cocann Gaon. teem33133 2 0140 EFTA00175482 • 'Case 9:08-cv-13L_ 11-K

n of not only the instant claim, but for other suits filed against Defendant EPSTEIN, including but not limited to the Florida RICO claims filed in State Court. 6. As stated in the certificate, the undersigned has conferred with counsel for EPSTEIN. They take the position that this motion would be moot bec

to trigger application of section 26.012, Florida Statutes, the statute that establishes the jurisdictional amount required for filing in Florida's Circuit Court (as opposed to County Court). 6 1...e364A1:Fi II rt. 3059 Game Avow. Suns 340, Cocomo Gam, rims33133 9 a/ 31$ EFTA00231018 Case 9:08-cv-80804-

papers have been filed. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1446(d), defendants have served this Notice of Removal on July 18, 2008. All papers filed in State Court are attached to this Removal Petition. 3. There is unanimity among the defendants. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b) the undersigned are auth