Epstein Secrets

effrey Epstein the sex offender, rather than the prosecutors who work for you. Today we had a telephone conference call with two of your attorneys, Dexter Lee and Marie Villafana, in which they told us that we would not be receiving any cooperation from your Office on our CVRA case and that, in short, we

ld, withhold from the victims information in your Office's possession that would support their claims under the CVRA. After receiving approval from Dexter and Marie, we wanted to write to you personally in one last effort to see if we can narrow our differences on these two issues and avoid a disappoin

ting criminals, your Office would promptly turn over to us all information in its possession that was helpful to these criminals under the Brady and Giglio decisions. We asked your Office to extend to the victims the same assistance that it would provide to criminals — i.e., we asked Dexter and Marie t

Y that on October 10, 2017, the foregoing was filed with the Clerk of the Court and served on counsel on the attached service list using CM/ECF. Is/Dexter A. Lee Dexter A. Lee Assistant United States Attorney 30 EFTA00800037 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 427 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/10/2017 Page 31 of 3

l her as a prosecution witness, the government would have been obligated to disclose her prior exculpatory statements as impeachment material under Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972). While petitioners attempt to rehabilitate Jane Doe 2 by relying upon theories of victimization, to explain h

FY that on October 6, 2017, the foregoing was filed with the Clerk of the Court and served on counsel on the attached service list using CM/ECF. Is/Dexter A. Lee Dexter A. Lee Assistant United States Attorney 30 EFTA00800005 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 425-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/06/2017 Page 32 of

l her as a prosecution witness, the government would have been obligated to disclose her prior exculpatory statements as impeachment material under Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972). While petitioners attempt to rehabilitate Jane Doe 2 by relying upon theories of victimization, to explain h

ld, withhold from the victims information in your Office's possession that would support their claims under the CVRA. After receiving approval from Dexter and Marie, we wanted to write to you personally in one last effort to see if we can narrow our differences on these two issues and avoid a disappoin

nting criminals, your 0 ice would promptly turn over to us all information in its possession that was helpful to these criminals under the Brady and Giglio decisions. We asked your Office to extend to the victims the same assistance that it would provide to criminals — i.e., we asked to voluntarily pr

tr.if"'" • Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Docurnor450L1A w Eptyppeop FLSD Docket 03121/2011 Page 1 of 2 • aitadedataa% • AND ASSOCIATES October 9, 2008 Dexter Lee, AUSA United States Attorney's Office 99 N.E. 4th Street Miami, Florida 33132 Re: Jane Doe # and Jane Doe #2 United States of America Case No.

1976) (same), on issue of possible violations of their rights under CVRA and remedy for such violations, including any impeachment information under Giglio i United States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972). 2. The parties shall make every possible effort in good faith to stipulate to all facts or points of law the