Epstein Secrets

Marra on 7/7/08. (ir) (Entered: 07/07/2008) 07/09/2008 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Dcxtcr Lee on behalf of United States of America (Lee, Dexter) (Entered: 07/09/2008) EFTA00177337 Case 9:08-cv-8( giao8-aaestowseit 1AQof: Clintift200t611LS0DPaildirEttf07 ,37.)8 Page 2 of 2 07/09/2008 6

e not been violated. Therefore, her emergency petition should be denied. Respectfully submitted, R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY By: DEXTER A. LEE Assistant U.S. Attorney Fla. Bar No. 0936693 99 N.E. 4' Street Miami, Florida 33132 (305) 961-9320 Fax: (305) 530-7139 E-mail: clexter.lee@usd

On July 7, 2008, the Court directed the Government to file a response to the Petition by July 9, 2008, at 5:00 p.m. The Government has prepared its Response, which is attached as Exhibit A, and the Declaration of Assistant United States Attorney A. Marie Villafana, as well as correspondence with several

arie C. (USAFLS)" [[email protected]] Sent: 10/16/2008 04:23 PM AST To: Jay Leflcowitz; "Roy BLACK" <[email protected]> Cc: "Lee, Dexter (USAFLS)" <Dexter[email protected]>; "Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS)" <[email protected]> Subject: Reply Brief in Jane Does United States Dear Roy

r. Epstein has no interest in keeping the agreement confidential because he has not responded to Mr. Edwards' motion to unseal. As you know, in our Response, the United States argued that this issue should be litigated in one of the suits filed by Mr. Edwards against Mr. Epstein. Mr. Edwards apparently b

Jay Lefkowitz [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 5:01 PM To: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS); Roy Black Cc: Lee, Dexter (USAFLS); Atkinson, n (USAFLS) Subject: Re: Reply Brief in Jane Does I. United States Thanks Marie - welcome to the club. I often wish plaintiffs

r. Epstein has no interest in keeping the agreement confidential because he has not responded to Mr. Edwards' motion to unseal. As you know, in our Response, the United States argued that this issue should be litigated in one of the suits filed by Mr. Edwards against Mr. Epstein. Mr. Edwards apparently b

rom: Jay Lefkowitz <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 5:01 PM To: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS); Roy Black Cc: Lee, Dexter (USAFLS); Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS) Subject: Re: Reply Brief in Jane Does I United States Thanks Marie - welcome to the club. I often wish plaintif

r. Epstein has no interest in keeping the agreement confidential because he has not responded to Mr. Edwards' motion to unseal. As you know, in our Response, the United States argued that this issue should be litigated in one of the suits filed by Mr. Edwards against Mr. Epstein. Mr. Edwards apparently b

. 12. I never learned any confidential, non-public information about the Epstein matter. 13. In late December 2007, I had an "exit meeting" with Dexter Lee, the Office's ethics officer. As part of that meeting, Mr. Lee reviewed with me the Department of Justice's post-employment restrictions. Based on

(DE1 at 1-2.) On the same day, the government was ordered by the Court to respond. (DE3). Two days later, on July 9, 2008, the Government filed its Response and an accompanying Declaration, establishing that (1) no federal criminal case charging Epstein had ever been filed and that a non- prosecution agr

r. 12. I never teamed any confidential, non-public information about the Epstein matter. 13. In late December 2007, I had an "exit meeting" with Dexter Lee, the Office's ethics officer. As part of that meeting, Mr. Lee reviewed with me the Department of Justice's post-employment restrictions. Based on

(DE1 at 1-2.) On the same day, the government was ordered by the Court to respond. (DE3). Two days later, on July 9, 2008, the Government filed its Response and an accompanying Declaration, establishing that (1) no federal criminal case charging Epstein had ever been filed and that a non- prosecution agr