Epstein Secrets

xter Lee, Southern District of Florida, seeking advice regarding office-wide recusal, dated December 16 and 17, 2010, with attached letter from Paul Cassell to Wifredo A. Ferrer, dated December 10, 2010 Attorney-Client Privilege No Factual Underpinnings; Fiduciary Duty; Ordinary Government Communicat

aims Against Public Prosecutor; Attorney Conduct at Issue Suppl. Box 3 P-013925 Thru P-013927 Draft Letter, from Robin C. Ashton to Professor Paul G. Cassell, with handwritten correction Deliberative Process Privilege Attorney Work Product Inadequate Log; No Factual Underpinnings; Fiduciary Duty; No

16 and 17, 2010, with attached letter from Paul Cassell to Wifredo A. Ferrer, dated December 10, 2010

2011, 11:19 a.m., RE: Re-write of Epstein letters for your review, with e-mail from Lisa Howard to Ruth Plagenhoef (May 5, 2011, 11:08 a.m.), and Plagenhoef to Howard (May 5, 2011, 11:10 a.m.), and Howard to Plagenhoef (May 5, 2011, 10:41 a.m.), attached Deliberative Process Privilege Attorney Work

Page 69 of 70 Bates Range Description Privilege(s) Asserted Victims' Objections Plagenhoef to Howard (May 5, 2011, 11:01 a.m.), and Howard to Plagenhoef (May 5, 2011, 10:41), attached Suppl. Box 3 P-013945 E-mail, Plagenhoef to Howard, May 4, 2011, 5:01 p.m., RE: draft letters in Epstein matter,

524-2822 E-mail: [email protected] Paul G. Cassell S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University o

rrections Deliberative Process Privilege Attorney Work Product Suppl. Box 3 P-013937 Thru P-013939 Draft Letter, Robin C. Ashton to Professor Paul G. Cassell, with handwritten corrections Deliberative Proccss Privilege Attorney Work Product Suppl. Box 3 P-013940 Thru P-013942 Draft Letter, marked "

e, Southern District of Florida, seeking advice P-013278 regarding office-wide recusal, dated December 16 and 17, 2010, with attached letter from Paul Cassell to Wifredo A. Ferrer, dated December 10, 2010 Page 23 of 23 EFTA00191236 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District o

2011, 11:19 a.m., RE: Re-write of Epstein letters for your review, with c-mail from Lisa Howard to Ruth Plagenhoef (May 5, 2011, 11:08 a.m.), and Plagenhoef to Howard (May 5, 2011, 11:10 a.m.), and Howard to Plagenhoef (May 5, 2011, 10:41 a.m.), attached Deliberative Process Privilege Attorney Work P

view, with c-mail from Lisa Howard to Ruth Plagenhoef (May 5, 2011, 11:08 a.m.), and Plagenhoef to Howard (May 5, 2011, 11:10 a.m.), and Howard to Plagenhoef (May 5, 2011, 10:41 a.m.), attached Deliberative Process Privilege Attorney Work Product Suppl. Box 3 P-013944 E-mail, Plagenhoef to Howard, M

rrections Deliberative Process Privilege Attorney Work Product Suppl. Box 3 P-013937 Thru P-013939 Draft Letter, Robin C. Ashton to Professor Paul G. Cassell, with handwritten corrections Deliberative Process Privilege Attorney Work Product Suppl. Box 3 P-013940 Thru P-013942 Draft Letter, marked "

er Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos Lehrman Paul G. Cassell S.J. I uinne olle e of Law at the Attorneys fo

view, with e-mail from Lisa Howard to Ruth Plagenhoef (May 5, 2011, 11:08 a.m.), and Plagenhoef to Howard (May 5, 2011, 11:10 a.m.), and Howard to Plagenhoef (May 5, 2011, 10:41 a.m.), attached Deliberative Process Privilege Attorney Work Product Suppl. Box 3 P-013944 E-mail, Plagenhoef to Howard, M

2011, 11:19 a.m., RE: Re-write of Epstein letters for your review, with e-mail from Lisa Howard to Ruth Plagenhoef (May 5, 2011, 11:08 a.m.), and Plagenhoef to Howard (May 5, 2011, 11:10 a.m.), and Howard to Plagenhoef (May 5, 2011, 10:41 a.m.), attached Deliberative Process Privilege Attorney Work P

aims Against Public Prosecutor; Attorney Conduct at Issue Suppl. Box 3 P-013925 Thru P-013927 Draft Letter, from Robin C. Ashton to Professor Paul G. Cassell, with handwritten correction Deliberative Process Privilege Attorney Work Product Inadequate Log; No Factual Underpinnings; Fiduciary Duty; No

075 E-mail: [email protected] and Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice 1 EFTA00179619 Case 9:08-cv-807

2011, 11:19 a.m., RE: Re-write of Epstein letters for your review, with e-mail from Lisa Howard to Ruth Plagenhoef (May 5, 2011, 11:08 am.), and Plagenhoef to Howard (May 5, 2011, 11:10 am.), and Howard to Plagenhoef (May 5, 2011, 10:41 a.m.), attached Deliberative Process Privilege Attorney Work P

Page 69 of 70 Bates Range Description Privilege(s) Asserted Victims' Objections Plagenhoef to Howard (May 5, 2011, 11:01 a.m.), and Howard to Plagenhoef (May 5, 2011,10:41), attached Suppl. Box 3 P-013945 E-mail, Plagenhoef to Howard, May 4, 2011, 5:01 p.m., RE: draft letters in Epstein matter,

est for information - - when can chat? Ruth — Thanks. — When can we chat about this? Brad and I are free next Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday. Paul Paul G. Cassell Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah Fax: Email: http://www.law.utah.edu

nal message. Thank you. From: Plagenhoef, Ruth (OPR) [mailto: Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2011 9:44 AM To: Paul Cassell Subject: OPR complaint Mr. Cassell, I received your voice mail and thought that I should respond by email to be sure you get a timely answer — with the time difference it can be hard t

Brad, We can talk today or tomorrow. I am in the office both days. Thanks. From: Paul Cassell [mailto: Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2011 3:36 PM To: Plagenhoef, Ruth (OPR); (USAFLS) Cc: Brad Edwards Subject: RE: OPR inquiry - request for information - - when can chat? Ruth — Thanks. — When can we chat