Epstein Secrets

Paul G. Cassell, Esquire, at email address: cassellpillaw.utah.edu,. WHEREFORE, Brad Edwards, Esquire, moves this Court to enter an Order permitting Paul G. Cassell to appear before this Court on behalf of Jane Doe, for all purposes relating to the proceedings in the above-styled matter and directing the Clerk t

ention the federal non-prosecution agreement to this counsel and that you did not mention that a plea agreement had already been reached. Professor Cassell has spoken to Meg Garvin, Esq., at the National Crime Victims' Law Institute, and that is her recollection of the events. 7. I think that your pro

that a plea agreement had already been reached. Professor Cassell has spoken to Meg Garvin, Esq., at the National

he first place. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c) (allowing for entry of a protective order upon motion for a party "for good cause shown"); see also In re Alexander Grant & Co. Litigation, 820 F.2d 352, 356 (11'h Cir. 1987) ("good cause" for a protective order "generally signifies a sound basis or legitimate need to take judicial act

Bar No. 542075 2028 Harrison Street - Suite 202 EFTA00216193 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 30 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/16/2008 Page 5 of 6 Paul G. Cassell Attorney for Petitioners Pro Hac Vice 332 S. 1400 E. Salt Lake City, UT 84112 Jay C. Howell, Esquire Attorney for Petitioners Pro Hac Vice 64

d on FLSD Docket 10/16/2008 Page 5 of 6 Paul G. Cassell Attorney for Petitioners Pro Hac Vice 332 S. 1

he first place. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c) (allowing for entry of a protective order upon motion for a party "for good cause shown"); see also In re Alexander Grant & Co. Litigation, 820 F.2d 352, 356 (11th Cir. 1987) ("good cause" for a protective order "generally signifies a sound basis or legitimate need to take judicial act

Brad Edwards, Esquire Attorney for Petitioners EFTA00235162 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 30 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/16/2008 Page 5 of 6 Paul G. Cassell Attorney for Petitioners Pro Hac Vice Jay C. Howell, Esquire Attorney for Petitioners Pro Hac Vice CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY tha

d on FLSD Docket 10/16/2008 Page 5 of 6 Paul G. Cassell Attorney for Petitioners Pro Hac Vice Jay C. H

he first place. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c) (allowing for entry of a protective order upon motion for a party "for good cause shown"); see also In re Alexander Grant & Co. Litigation, 820 F.2d 352, 356 (11th Cir. 1987) ("good cause" for a protective order "generally signifies a sound basis or legitimate need to take judicial act

ax: 954-924-1530 E-Mail: [email protected] EFTA00189804 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 30 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/16/2008 Page 5 of 6 Paul G. Cassell Attorney for Petitioners Pro Hac Vice 332 S. 1400 E. Salt Lake City, UT 84112 Telephone: 801-585-5202 Facsimile: 801-585-6833 E-Mail: casse

d on FLSD Docket 10/16/2008 Page 5 of 6 Paul G. Cassell Attorney for Petitioners Pro Hac Vice 332 S. 1

he first place. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c) (allowing for entry of a protective order upon motion for a party "for good cause shown"); see also In re Alexander Grant & Co. Litigation, 820 F.2d 352, 356 (11th Cir. 1987) ("good cause" for a protective order "generally signifies a sound basis or legitimate need to take judicial act

quet: 19-011 SDNY_GM_00332025 EFTA_0020475 1 EFTA02729735 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 28 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/25/2008 Page 7 of 8 1 Paul G. Cassell Attorney for Petitioners Pro Hac Vice 332 S. 1400 E. Salt Lake City, UT 84112 Telephone: 801-585-5202 Facsimile: 801-585-6833 E Mail: casse

SDNY_GM_00332040 I 1 r EFTA 00204766 EFTA02729750 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 30 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/16/2008 Page 5 of 6 Paul 0. Cassell Attorney for Petitioners Pro Hac Vice 332 S. 1400 E. Salt Lake City, UT 84112 Telephone: 801-585-5202 Facsimile: 801-585-6833 E-Mail: casse

he first place. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c) (allowing for entry of a protective order upon motion for a party "for good cause shown"); see also In re Alexander Grant & Co. Litigation, 820 F.2d 352, 356 (li ' Cir. 1987) ("good cause" for a protective order "generally signifies a sound basis or legitimate need to take judicial act

lorida 33020 Telephone: Facsimile: E-Mail: 6 EFTA00180697 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 28 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/25/2008 Page 7 of 8 Paul G. Cassell Attorney for Petitioners Pro Hac Vice 332 S. 1400 E. Salt Lake City, UT 84112 Telephone: Facsimile: E-Mall: Jay C. Howell, Esquire Attorney

d on FLSD Docket 09/25/2008 Page 7 of 8 Paul G. Cassell Attorney for Petitioners Pro Hac Vice 332 S. 1

he first place, See Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c) (allowing for entry of a protective order upon motion for a party "for good cause shown"); see also In re Alexander Grant & Co. Litigation, 820 F.2d 352, 356 (11th Cir. 1987) ("good cause" for a protective order "generally signifies a sound basis or legitimate need to take judicial act

lorida 33020 Telephone: Facsimile: E-Mail: 6 EFTA00231196 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 28 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/25/2008 Page 7 of 8 Paul G. Cassell Attorney for Petitioners Pro Hac Vice 332 S. 1400 E. Salt Lake City, UT 84112 Telephone: Facsimile: E-Mail: Jay C. Howell, Esquire Attorney

d on FLSD Docket 09/25/2008 Page 7 of 8 Paul G. Cassell Attorney for Petitioners Pro Hac Vice 332 S. 1

he first place. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c) (allowing for entry of a protective order upon motion for a party "for good cause shown'); see also In re Alexander Grant & Co. Litigation, 820 F.2d 352, 356 (11th Cir. 1987) ("good cause" for a protective order "generally signifies a sound basis or legitimate need to take judicial act

eet - Suite 202 Hollywood, Telephone: E-Mail: EFTA00232331 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 30 Entered on FLED Docket 10/16/2008 Page 5 of 6 Paul G. Cassell Attorney for Petitioners Pro Hac Vice 332 S. 1400 E. Salt Lake City 4 Telephone: Facsimile: E-Mail: Jay C. Howell, Esquire Attorney for Pet

ntered on FLSD Docket 09/25/2008 Page 7 of 8 G. Cassell Attorney for Petitioners Pro Hac Vice 332 S. 1

he first place. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c) (allowing for entry of a protective order upon motion for a party "for good cause shown"); see also In re Alexander Grant & Co. Litigation, 820 F.2d 352, 356 (11th Cir. 1987) ("good cause" for a protective order "generally signifies a sound basis or legitimate need to take judicial act