Epstein Secrets

eys for Plaintiff BY: SIGRID S. McCAWLEY, ESQ. MEREDITH L. SCHULTZ, ESQ. S.J. QUINNEY COLLEGE OF LAW AT THE UNIVERSITY OF UTAH For Plaintiff BY: PAUL G. CASSELL, ESQ. FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS, LEHRMAN, P.L. Attorneys for Plaintiff BY: BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, ESQ. HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.

jury, statements to a jury, that they are going to be then arguing are credible, and so we have this joinder motion, drafted by Mr. Edwards and Mr. Cassell, that they would like to introduce into evidence, whole cloth into evidence, that contains the legal arguments and the statements of lawyers, thes

22 23 24 25 problem. Well, no, it isn't. No, it isn't. Okay. So let's do 675. MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, I will say that it is my reading of Rule 412 that any hearing that is based upon in part Rule 412 is supposed to be conducted in a in camera setting. MS. SCHULTZ: Counsel for Ms. has no objec

oldber er Es . Robert D. Critton, Es . Bradley James Edwards Isidro Manuel Garcia Jack Patrick Hill Katherine Warthen Ezell Michael James Pike Paul G. Cassell Richard Horace Willits Robert C. Josefsberg 9 EFTA00729124

herine Warthen Ezell Michael James Pike Paul G. Cassell Richard Horace Willits Robert C. Josefsberg 9

9-KAM Document 266 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/14/2009 Page 7 of 9 history, thereby evading the limitations on discovery and admissibility found in Rule 412 for the only conceivable purpose of harassing the Plaintiff. Defendant asserts that he seeks to use investigators to ask ex-boyfriends and friends

ld solve many of the problems that we 11 just talked about, however. 12 Okay. Where are we? Yes. Evidence of Maxwell's 13 involvement. 14 MR. CASSELL: Is this 686? 15 THE COURT: Yes. 16 MR. CASSELL: Yes, your Honor. Paul Cassell for 17 Ms. I'm arguing this motion. 18 As you know, the motio

ay. Where are we? Yes. Evidence of Maxwell's 13 involvement. 14 MR. CASSELL: Is this 686? 15 THE COURT: Yes. 16 MR. CASSELL: Yes, your Honor. Paul Cassell for 17 Ms. I'm arguing this motion. 18 As you know, the motion was an affirmative motion to 19 avoid disputes arising in the middle of trial,

same 2 problem. Well, no, it isn't. No, it isn't. 3 Okay. So let's do 675. 4 MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, I will say that it is my 5 reading of Rule 412 that any hearing that is based upon in part 6 Rule 412 is supposed to be conducted in a in camera setting. 7 MS. SCHULTZ: Counsel for Ms. has no

Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08- 80893 Paul G. Cassell, Esq. Pro Hac Vice 332 South 1400 E, Room 101

tein Rosenfeldt Adler 401 East Las Olas Boulevard Suite 1650 Fort Laud rdal F1.33301 Phon • Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08- 80893 Paul G. Cassell, Esq. Pro Hac Vice 332 South 1400 E, Room 101 Salt T. aka City, UT 84112 Co-counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe 08- Isidro M. Garcia, Esq. Garcia La

l conduct or predisposition in civil cases, which will be continued to be governed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26. In order not to undermine the rationale of Rule 412, however, courts should enter appropriate orders pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 (c) to protect the victim against unwarranted inquiries and to ensu