Epstein Secrets

une, 2009. Respectfully Submitted, s/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER Las Olas City Centre AC14 I OCfl And Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice Ll 19 EFTA00234889 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 165 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/19/2009 Page 20 of 41 CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-MA

red on FLSD Docket 06/19/2009 Page 28 of 41 I swear the foregoing to be truthful under the penalty of perjury. FURTHER THE AFFIANT SAYETH NAUGHT. aul G. Cassell EFTA00234898 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 165 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/19/2009 Page 29 of 41 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRI

financial sophistication. See Affidavit of Paul Cassell at ¶ 2 Attachment A to this Pleading. 3. Accord

a "perfect circumstantial evidence case that [Epstein] ha[s] means, motive, and opportunity" to fraudulently transfer assets. See United States v. Sparks, 265 F.3d 825, 830 (9th Cir. 2001) (finding probable cause for an arrest based solely on a showing of means, motive, and opportunity). The fact tha

O: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON 6 Cassell, Esq., that Jane Doe initially filed. To the extent that any of the information provided in the Cassell affidavit was hearsay, that problem has now disappeared in view of the Declaration signed by Epstein that Jane Doe is providing to the Court. The

[email protected] Jack Patrick Hill [email protected] Katherine Warthen Ezell [email protected] Michael James Pike [email protected] Paul G. Cassell [email protected] Richard Horace Willits [email protected] Robert C. Josefsberg [email protected] Adam D. Horowitz ahorow

ive, and opportunity to fraudulently transfer assets.” Jane Doe’s Motion to Restrain Fraudulent Transfer of Assets at 11 (quoting United States v. Sparks, 265 F.3d 825, 830 (9th Cir. 2001)).2 Epstein completely misses the point of Jane Doe’s means, motive, and opportunity argument, construing it as s

id [email protected] Jack Patrick Hill [email protected] Katherine Warthen Ezell [email protected] Michael James Pike [email protected] Paul G. Cassell [email protected] Richard Horace Willits [email protected] Robert C. Josefsberg rjosefsbe rg@pod h u rst.com Adam D. Horowitz ahorowit

financial sophistication. See Affidavit of Paul Cassell at ,r 2 Attachment A to this Pleading. 3. Accor

a "perfect circumstantial evidence case that [Epstein] ha[s] means, motive, and opportunity" to fraudulently transfer assets. See United States v. Sparks, 265 F.3d 825, 830 (9th Cir. 2001) (finding probable cause for an arrest based solely on a showing of means, motive, and opportunity). The fact tha

eavily on the affidavit Jane Doe's own counsel. See Affidavit of Paul Cassell, Esq., attached as Exhibit A to the Injunction Motion (DE #165). Mr. Cassell's affidavit is riddled with hearsay, speculation, conjecture and unsupported assumptions and does not contain one material "fact" based on his pers

est Palm Beach, FL 33409 561-686-6300 Fax: 561-383-9424 [email protected] [email protected] Counsel for Plaintiff, C.M.A. Bruce Reinhart, Esq. Paul G. Cassell, Esq. ProHac Vice 332 South 1400 E, Room 101 Salt Lake City, UT 84112 801-585-5202 801-585-6833 Fax [email protected] Co-counsel for Plain

Epstein is fraudulently transferring assets because he purportedly has the means, the motive and the opportunity to do so, citing United States v. Sparks, 265 F.3d 825, 830 (9th Cir. 2001). See Injunction Motion (DE #165) at 11. Sparks is completely inapposite as it concerned whether probable cause fo