Epstein Secrets

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: 954-524-2820 Fax: 954-524-2822 [email protected] Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08- 80893, - • Paul G. Cassell, Esq. Pro Hac Vice 332 South 1400 E, Room 101 Salt Lake City, UT 84112 801-585-5202 801-585-6833 Fax [email protected] Co-counsel for Plai

ntiff in Related Case No. 08- 80893, - • Paul G. Cassell, Esq. Pro Hac Vice 332 South 1400 E, Room 101

safe harbor of the 5'" Amendment2 ate Ohio v. Reiner, 532 U.S. 17 (1991). 2 See PeLisi v. Bankers Ins. Company 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 4d. DCA 1983); Malloy v. Hogan. 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964Xthe Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fou

nsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08- 80893 Paul G. Cassell, Esq. ProHac Vice 332 South 1400 E, Room 101 S

Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08- 80893 Paul G. Cassell, Esq. ProHac Vice 332 South 1400 E, Room 101 S

Ins. Company, 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Malloy v. Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth A

e 1650 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: 954-522-3456 Fax: 954-527-8663 [email protected] Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08- 80893 Paul G. Cassell, Esq. Pro Hae Vice 332 South 1400 E, Room 101 Salt Lake City, UT 84112 801-585-5202 801-585-6833 Fax [email protected] Co-counsel for Plai

Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08- 80893 Paul G. Cassell, Esq. Pro Hae Vice 332 South 1400 E, Room 101

. United States, 425 U.S. 391 (1976); McCormick on Evidence, Title 6, Chap. 13. The Privilege Against Self-Incrimination, §138 (6 th Ed.). See also Malloy v. Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fou

t Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: 954-524-2820 Fax: 954-524-2822 brad(alpathtoiustice.com Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08- 80893, ., t Paul G. Cassell, Esq. Pro Hae Vice 332 South 1400 E, Room 101 Salt Lake City, UT 84112 801-585-5202 801-585-6833 Fax [email protected] Co-counsel for Pla

iff in Related Case No. 08- 80893, ., t Paul G. Cassell, Esq. Pro Hae Vice 332 South 1400 E, Room 101

e safe harbor of the 5 Amendment.2 See Ohio v. Reiner, 532 U.S. 17(1991). 2 See DeLisi v. Bankers Ins. Company. 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Malloy v. Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fo

8- 80381, 08-80993, 08-80994 Richard Horace Willits, Esq. Richard H. Willits, P.A. 2290 10th Avenue North Suite 404 Lake Worth, FL 33461 80811 Paul G. Cassell, Esq. Pro Hac Vice 332 South 1400 E, Room 101 Salt Lake City, UT 84112 Co-counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe Case No. 08- Isidro M. Garcia, Esq. Ga

Suite 404 Lake Worth, FL 33461 80811 Paul G. Cassell, Esq. Pro Hac Vice 332 South 1400 E, Room 101

v. United States, 425 U.S. 391 (1976)• McCormick on Evidence, Title 6, Chap. 13. The Privilege Against Self-Incrimination, §138 (6th Ed.). See also Malloy v. Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964Xthe Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Four

Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08- 80893 Paul G. Cassell, Esq. Pro Hac Vice 332 South 1400 E, Room 101

tein Rosenfeldt Adler 401 East Las Olas Boulevard Suite 1650 Fort Laud rdal F1.33301 Phon • Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08- 80893 Paul G. Cassell, Esq. Pro Hac Vice 332 South 1400 E, Room 101 Salt T. aka City, UT 84112 Co-counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe 08- Isidro M. Garcia, Esq. Garcia La

Defendant asserts his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. See DeLisi v. Bankers Ins. Company, 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 41" DCA 1983); Malloy v. Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fo

dwards Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler 401 East Las Olas Blvd Suite 1650 Ft. Lauderdale FL 33301 Fax: Email: LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Paul G. Cassell Email: PRO HAG ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED represented by Jack Alan Goldberger Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite

: LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Paul G. Cassell Email: PRO HAG ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED represen

v. United States, 425 U.S. 391 (1976); McCormick on Evidence, Title 6, Chap. 13. The Privilege Against Self-Incrimination, §138 (6th Ed.). See also Malloy v. Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fou

, Goodman, G. S., Eilertson, D., & Magnussen, S. (2004). Beliefs about child witnesses: A national survey. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 10, 347-365. Castelli, P., Goodman, G. S., & Ghetti, S. (2005). Effects of interview style and witness age on perceptions of children's credibility in sexual abuse cases.

595-613. Goodman, G. S. (2006). Children's eyewitness memory: A modern history and contemporary commentary. Journal of Social Issues, 62, 811-832. Malloy, L., Mitchell, E., Block, S., Quas, J., & Goodman, G. S. (2006). Children's eyewitness memory: Balancing children's needs and defendants' rights whe

She’s made the whole story up out of whole cloth.” are part of a plot to exto Bradley Edwards had already become involved in lawsuits q Edwards and Cassell have { against Epstein. In 2007, working with a former federal judge i. he’s ever seen. and University of Utah law professor named Paul Cassell, he h

dan to get off scot-free. But the plot twist that E on the day of Alan Dershow Florida, courthouse was eve “There was a criminal extort Edwards and Paul Cassell’s | 2015. “Your clients were involv Bradley and Cassell had s for defamation— payback fo : law professor had made in th Dershowitz had counters HOUS

involved in encouraging rious affidavit that they knew or perjurious recently when they matory allegation in the federal that what you are charging Brad- Paul Cassell with doing was sub- Pore ere oy om OB e question, I am directly charging dwards with suborning perjury. I irginia Roberts did not want to © ds that

595-613. Goodman, G. S. (2006). Children's eyewitness memory: A modem history and contemporary commentary. Journal of Social Issues, 62, 811-832. Malloy, L., Mitchell, E., Block, S., Quas, J., Sr Goodman, G. S. (2006). Children's eyewitness memory: Balancing children's needs and defendants' rights wh

views and interviewer bias on young children's event memory and false reports. Developmental Psychology, 43, 823-837. Goodman, G. S., Ghetti, S., & Castelli, P. (2007). Trauma, memory, and child maltreatment. In F. Petruccelli, V. Verrastro, & M. Santilli (Eds.), Memoria e suggestionabilito nell'ete evol