Epstein Secrets

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ROUGH DRAFT TITLE ***ROUGH DRAFT TRANSCRIPT*** CASE NAME: BRADLEY J. EDWARDS and PAUL G. CASSELL vs. ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ WITNESS NAME: PAUL G. CASSELL DATE OF DEPOSITION: 10/16/15 This is an unedited, unproofread, uncertified transcript for

complex legally, some cases are simple legally. The more legal investigation would be required for the more complex cases. MR. SCAROLA: Professor Cassell , I know it is ROUGH DRAFT ONLY EFTA00607231 14 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 a lit

equired for the more complex cases. MR. SCAROLA: Professor Cassell , I know it is ROUGH DRAFT ONLY EFTA00607231

id you have a common interest privilege? A. Brad Edwards from, obviously, the law firm that I've been working with here. Also attorneys from the Boies Schiller law firm who were representing at that time. Q. Anyone else? A. The -- at that time, on December 30th, I don't know that it's directly responsi

648 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: CACE 15-000072 BRADLEY J. EDWARDS and PAUL G. CASSELL, Plaintiffs, vs. ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, Defendant. VIDEOTAPE CONTINUED DEPOSITION OF ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ VOLUME 5 Pages 648 through 781 Wednesda

s were made 2 A. Okay. I knew that there was a financial 3 against me. I received a series of phone calls and 3 motivation here. I also knew that Cassell and 4 people approached me at various events and they 4 Edwards had lied when the said they were 5 warned me about the reputation of Bradley Edward

8 gave me a list of things. and one is -- 9 Q. Let me just finish the statement so that 9 A. That's right. 10 we have a clean record. 10 Q. — Paul Cassell's reputation -- 11 -- contributed to your confidence in 11 A. That's right. 12 making the public statement in January 5.2015. that 12 Q. — that

Y: Right. And I just want to 3 representations that there wouldn't be any 4 be clear. Mr. Epstein's counsel has not 4 testimony with respect to Boies Schiller 5 appeared in this case. I argued this issue 5 Flexner or those allegations that have 6 before the judge. and I have a confidentiality 6 repe

x with Dershowitz and others when she was a minor. Here are details about the settlement.) The latest bombshell: Jack Scarola, counsel for lawyers Paul Cassell and Bradley Edwards, emailed me this: "If Mr. Dershowitz were to request a waiver of the confidentiality provisions, we would agree to the request.

wn the gauntlet! That would mean spilling the terms of the settlement—about who had to shell out what to make this messy lawsuit go away. I assumed Cassell and Edwards paid Dershowitz and wanted confidentiality, since they admitted in the settlement to making "mistakes" in alleging that Dershowitz had s

says this: What is true is that Mr. Edwards and Professor Cassell entered into a monetary settlement that resolved

n and other matters if [Edwards, Cassell and Boies] are prepared to enter negotiations to unsea deposition and my affidavit regarding Boies, which Boies Schiller has demanded be sealed." The point is, he says, is that "it has to be mutual." So that's the end of the chapter. Hah. Copyright 2016. ALM Media P

HF AF BF HF Fe Fe HF |S ao FBP WN F- 970 DO DN ODO OT BR W NY — ROUGH DRAFT TITLE ***ROUGH DRAFT TRANSCRIPT *** CASE NAME: BRADLEY J. EDWARDS and PAUL G. CASSELL vs. ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ WITNESS NAME: PAUL G. CASSELL DATE OF DEPOSITION: 10/16/15 This is an unedited, unproofread, | uncertified transcript for a

re complex legally, some cases are simple legally. The more legal investigation would be required for the more complex cases. MR. SCAROLA: Professor Cassell, I know it is ROUGH DRAFT ONLY HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021836 Oo O DN OO FF WwW NY =| NO RO PO PNP NM NO | S| S| HS SF S| S| S| S| S| non BP WO NO -|- OD

required for the more complex cases. MR. SCAROLA: Professor Cassell, I know it is ROUGH DRAFT ONLY HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_

ys did you have a common interest privilege? A. Brad Edwards from, obviously, the law firm that I've been working with here. Also attorneys from the Boies Schiller law firm who were representing Virginia Roberts at that time. Q. Anyone else? A. The -- at that time, on December 30th, I don't know that it's dire

escribing this alleged sexual activity. (a at ¶ 10). Thereafter in 2015 Dershowitz said on national television that counsel on the joinder motion, Paul Cassell and Bradley Edwards, had engaged in "unethical behavior warranting "s ent for filing the Joinder Motion." (Id. at ¶ 11). alleges that Dershowitz m

r warranting "s ent for filing the Joinder Motion." (Id. at ¶ 11). alleges that Dershowitz made this statement about her counsel "wrongfully." (a) Cassell *567 and Edwards sued Dershowitz for defamation, and that case was settled in April 2016. (I at 'II 11-12). In 2015, Dershowitz made a number of

thereo is fore the Court. Attorneys and Law Firms *566 Sigrid S. McCawley, Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP, Fort Lauderdale, FL, Joshua Schiller, Boies Schiller Flexner LLP, New York, NY, for Plaintiff. Arthur Louis Aidala, Law Offices of Aidala & Bertuna, P.C., Brooklyn, NY, Christian Kiely, Howard M. Coo

of process issues. On November 7, 2017, Mr. Edwards sent the following email: From: Brad Edwards Sent: Tuesday, November 7, 2017 6:51 AM To: Cc Paul Cassell Subject: Maxwell Hi Jeff/Laura, Presumably you have a way of contacting Ms. Maxwell and will do so this week in light of the hearing tomorrow. In

Tuesday, November 7, 2017 6:51 AM To: Cc Paul Cassell Subject: Maxwell Hi Jeff/Laura, Presumably you

unsuccessfully — to arrange service through the Haddon Morgan firm. For example, on May 9, 2017, co-counsel for Jane Doe 43 (Ms. Sigrid McCawley at Boies Schiller) sent an email to Mr. Pagliuca as follows (id. at 3-4): From: Sigrid McCawley Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 017 4:33 PM To: Jeff Pagliuca Subject: Servi

2 MR. EDWARDS: Brad Edwards, also 3 representing the plaintiff, 4 5 MR. POTTINGER: Stan Pottinger, 6 also representing the plaintiff. 7 MR. CASSELL: Paul Cassell, from 8 Salt Lake City, Utah, also representing 9 10 MR. PAGLIUCA: Jeff Pagliuca and 11 Laura Menninger, on behalf of Ms. 12 M

lorida 33301 BY: BRAD EDWARDS, ESQUIRE 13 14 PAUL G. CASSELL ES UIRE 15 at ace ity, to 16 J. STANLEY POTT

uca and 11 Laura Menninger, on behalf of Ms. 12 Maxwell. 13 And Ms. McCawley has also entered 14 the room, and we have an assistant from 15 Boies Schiller from the Fort Lauderdale 16 office here today as well today. 17 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Will the court 18 reporter please swear in the witness. 19

ERSITY OF UTAH Attorneys for Plaintiff BY: PAUL CASSELL STEPTOE & JOHNSON LLP Attorneys for Defendants

LER & FLEXNER LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff BY: SIGRID MCCAWLEY S.J. QUINNEY COLLEGE OF LAW AT THE UNIVERSITY OF UTAH Attorneys for Plaintiff BY: PAUL CASSELL STEPTOE & JOHNSON LLP Attorneys for Defendants Jeffery Epstein, and BY: MICHAEL MILLER JUSTIN CHU DARREN K. INDYKE LLC Attorney for Defendant

OEC 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 All right. OK. I know people personally and professionally at Boies Schiller. I knew Mr. Haddon when I was in private practice. I may know people at Steptoe, but I'm not sure. Nothing about any of that affects anything that

ment with Epstein, as does his former partner Scott Rothstein, who’s now in prison for his role in a Ponzi scheme. But the other lawyer in this case, Paul Cassell, is a former federal judge and a law professor. Why is he getting involved? Everyone is shocked that he would be part of this. | think he’s always h

counsel in the CVRA actions, Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell. Dershowitz, in nationally televised news interviews, wrongfully claimed that Edwards and Cassell had engaged in unethical behavior warranting disbarment for filing the Joinder Motion that described Dershowitz’s involvement with Epstein and Robert

ons but he also said that the client strongly believed what she was saying. At Mr. Dershowitz’s request I attended a meeting on July 6, 2015, at the Boies Schiller Flexner offices in New York City with David Boies and Sigrid McCawley with Mr. Dershowitz participating by Skype. The purpose of the meeting as state

:44 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: CACE 15-000072 BRADLEY J. EDWARDS and PAUL G. CASSELL, Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants, VS. ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff. / DEFENDANT/COUNTERCLAIM PLAINTIFF ALAN M. DERSHOWI

e referenced case. His rulings are as follows: Non Party's motion to quash, or for protective order, regarding subpoena served on non party law firm Boies Schiller: | The subpoena, as to the law firm, is quashed As to the "Jane Doe #3" subpoena: The motion is granted as to request #9, 17, 18, 20 and 23. The mo

howitz has repeatedly referred to HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015621 --- PAGE BREAK --- Edwards, Bradley vs. Dershowitz Case No.: CACE 15-000072 Edwards and Cassells Response to Dershowitz's Motion to Determine Confidentiality of Court Records Page 2 of 20 these documents, not only in defamatory statements broadc