Epstein Secrets

for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein Brad Edwards, Esq. Fanner, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, PL ounse or ant in e a e ase No. 084089-3 Paul G. Cassell, Esq. Pro Hac Vice EFTA00207708 Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 128 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/05/2010 Page 33 of 36 Jane Doe v. Epstein Case N

ounse or ant in e a e ase No. 084089-3 Paul G. Cassell, Esq. Pro Hac Vice EFTA00207708 Case 9:08-cv-

Epstein Case No. 08-CV-80893-Marra-Johnson Page 18 Where the statute's words are unambiguous—as the are here—the "judicial inquiry is complete." Merritt v. Dillard Paver Co., 120 F.3d 1181, 1186 (11th Cir. 1997) (citation omitted)). Under the 2003 version of the statute, only minors could initiate su

enses. The judge left open what the possible remedy could be.T'391 v. Epstein (2015) In a December 2014 Florida court filing by Bradley Edwards and Paul G. Cassell meant for inclusion in the Crime Victims I6 Where. are they P9-w-li IN Rights- Act lawsuit,['401 I (then known as higgeat payers jn the Jeffrey

rida court filing by Bradley Edwards and Paul G. Cassell meant for inclusion in the Crime Victims I6 Wher

Paul (SAPOL)- pwal, Scat ( ihde.I4APOli• Weliams Linda (SAPOLt ean. Swart ISAPOL-14401; r P011 ...eyeyo C tAZ et;at Harvey. Peter (SAPOL-PHO); Merritt. Philip ISAPOL1- Parr AP g Patterson Craig (SAPOL); Molts. Paul (4APOQ. Shanahan. Joanne (SAPOLI;Verne/to. Giovanni (SAPOI ' :ccehorneettairc co

Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08- 80893 Paul G. Cassell, Esq. Pro Hac Vice 332 South 1400 E, Room 101

tein Rosenfeldt Adler 401 East Las Olas Boulevard Suite 1650 Fort Laud rdal F1.33301 Phon • Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08- 80893 Paul G. Cassell, Esq. Pro Hac Vice 332 South 1400 E, Room 101 Salt T. aka City, UT 84112 Co-counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe 08- Isidro M. Garcia, Esq. Garcia La

he Agreement Acted in Good Faith [I] A party who materially breaches a cooperation or plea agreement may not claim its benefits. United States v. Merritt, 988 F.2d 1298, 1313 (2d Cir.), cert. denied 508 U.S. 961, 113 S.Ct. 2933, 124 1,.Ed.2d 683 (1993); United Slates v. Tilley. 964 F.2d 66, 70 (1st