Epstein Secrets

ose properties would be subject to forfeiture. But if evidence shows that his jets or other residences were also involved, those also could be lost, Cassella said. The Santa Fe New Mexican reported last week that the New Mexico attorney general, Hector Balderas, is investigating whether Epstein committed

cial exposure for criminal restitution in federal court is likely to exceed $500 million, and the exposure in state court to exceed a billion," said Paul Cassell, a University of Utah law professor, a former federal judge and a lawyer for one of Epstein's alleged victims. "It's easy to foresee 160 victims in

re in state court to exceed a billion," said Paul Cassell, a University of Utah law professor, a former fe

refer not to go into the details of that at this time." Boies represents three women who say Epstein molested them when they were girls. What About Madoff? Epstein's lawyers said their client was being prosecuted a second time for acts that ended in 2005 and were resolved in a non-prosecution agreemen

not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 03638-03641 09/08/2009 Bradley Edwards Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; pr

he admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 02633-02646 05/01/2009 Paul Cassell Bradley Edwards Response to Motion to Consolidate + Cassell strategy Memo for Jay Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admiss

covery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 06808-06810 09/13/2009 Bradley Edwards Paul Cassell "Is Jeffrey Epstein the new Madoff — Running a giant Ponzi scheme?" Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of

3-2011 Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman BATES DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION OBJECTION 03550-03574 09/09/2009 Attorneys at RRA Paul Cassell Litigation Strategy W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; pr

he admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 02633-02646 05/01/2009 Paul Cassell Bradley Edwards Response to Motion to Consolidate + Cassell strategy Memo for Jay Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admiss

covery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 06808-06810 09/13/2009 Bradley Edwards Paul Cassell "Is Jeffrey Epstein the new Madoff — Running a giant Ponzi schemer' Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of

States Attorneys - Of Counsel - EFTA00093262 Cassel.20-Z74030ASNII Mai OM& WV 1FMSZEZ9B3/20gell gyec2

ng United States v. Esposito, 309 F. Supp. 3d 24 (S.D.N.Y. 2018), United States v. Dreier, 596 F. Supp. 2d 831 (S.D.N.Y. 2009), and United States v. Madoff, 586 F. Supp. 2d 240 (S.D.N.Y. 2009), as "not on point and not persuasive," and distinguished the defendant for a number of reasons, including the

erg, _ over of Pan Am—a deal tl Steven Hoffenberg stil : 4. listening to him, one mus | seuilty to criminal conspit: . m illion swindle, a familiz Bernie Madoff case. Like so many others, Pithout the necessary w »?P ent at the office, he'd als HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021968 --- PAGE BREAK --- FittHy RicuH Hoffen

essor named Paul Cassell, he had Gled a lawsuit on behalf of another unnamed woman. Six years later, that case is still pending, and now, Edwards and Cassell i petition to have the two suits combined. Allin all, four Jane Does take part in the lawsuit. Jane Doe 3 is Virginia Roberts, the girl who says th

young, suggestible woman who was other unnamed woman. Six years interested in money,” Dershowitz says. “This is a disbarrable g, and now, Edwards and Cassell J offense, and they will be disbarred. They will rue the day the -ontined. a ever made this false charge against me.” It’s a vehement seals. ake part i