Epstein Secrets

Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) From: Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS) Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 6:15 PM To: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) Subject: FW: Epstein Sorry, forgot to cc you. From: S

of any issue not resolved by the parties through further discussions. Respectfully submitted, MARTIN WEINBERG, ESQ. ROY SLACK, ESQ. By /wg cc: Jeffrey Sloman, Esq. Robert Senior, Esq. Black, Srebnick. Kornspan & Stumpf, P.A. EFTA00193777 ROY BLACK HOWARD M. SREBNICK SCOTT A. KORNSPAN LARRY A. STUMP

and others offered other investors like the entity D3 fabricated investment opportunities in the Civil Actions involving EPSTEIN. Fisten (a former Dade County police officer with a questionable police record and RRA investigator) and Jenne (a former attorney, Broward County Sheriff and felon) assisted ROT

y Plaintiff, Mr. Epstein, through counsel, with the knowledge and express consent of the United States Attorney Mr. Acosta and First Assistant Mr. Sloman, was pursuing his right to review the Agreement through meetings and filings with the Department of Justice in Washington M., a review process that

over 10 years of full-time legal work in this non-firm attorney's ordinary job) are requested for work performed by an Assistant State Attorney for Dade County who was not a civil litigator and hads little or none specialized expertise in areas directly relevant to the consideration of civil settlements. T

$526,000 he has already paid the Plaintiffs. * Additionally, in an authoritative communication by the then First Assistant United States Attorney, Jeffrey Sloman, to Epstein's counsel Kenneth Starr dated December 4, 2007, pg 2, fn the Government agreed that it was the intentions of the parties that the "wai

over 10 years of full-time legal work in this non-firm attorney's ordinary job) are requested for work performed by an Assistant State Attorney for Dade County who has no specialized expertise in areas relevant to the consideration of civil settlements. These charges are not necessary, reasonable, nor wit

r. Epstein, through counsel, with the knowledge and consent of the United States Attorney Mr. Acosta and First Assistant Mr. EFTA00729137 Page 6 Sloman, was pursuing his right to review the Agreement through meetings and filings with the Department of Justice in Washington D.C., a review process tha

over 10 years of full-time legal work in this non-firm attorney's ordinary job) are requested for work performed by an Assistant State Attorney for Dade County who was not a civil litigator and had little or no specialized expertise in areas directly relevant to the consideration of civil settlements. These

dressed by Plaintiff, Mr. Epstein, through counsel, with the knowledge and consent of the United States Attorney Mr. Acosta and First Assistant Mr. Sloman, was pursuing his right to review the Agreement through meetings and filings with the Department of Justice in Washington M., a review process that

over 10 years of full-time legal work in this non-firm attorney's ordinary job) are requested for work performed by an Assistant State Attorney for Dade County who was not a civil litigator and hads little or none specialized expertise in areas directly relevant to the consideration of civil settlements. T

y Plaintiff, Mr. Epstein, through counsel, with the knowledge and express consent of the United States Attorney Mr. Acosta and First Assistant Mr. Sloman, was pursuing his right to review the Agreement through meetings and filings with the Department of Justice in Washington M., a review process that

over 10 years of full-time legal work in this non-firm attorney's ordinary job) are requested for work performed by an Assistant State Attorney for Dade County who was not a civil litigator and hads little or none specialized expertise in areas directly relevant to the consideration of civil settlements. T

dressed by Plaintiff, Mr. Epstein, through counsel, with the knowledge and consent of the United States Attorney Mr. Acosta and First Assistant Mr. Sloman, was pursuing his right to review the Agreement through meetings and filings with the Department of Justice in Washington M., a review process that

over 10 years of full-time legal work in this non-firm attorney's ordinary job) are requested for work performed by an Assistant State Attorney for Dade County who was not a civil litigator and hads little or none specialized expertise in areas directly relevant to the consideration of civil settlements. T

$526,000 he has already paid the Plaintiffs. * Additionally, in an authoritative communication by the then First Assistant United States Attorney, Jeffrey Sloman, to Epstein's counsel Kenneth Starr dated December 4, 2007, pg 2, fn the Government agreed that it was the intentions of the parties that the "wai

ver 10 years of full-time legal work in this non-firm attorney's ordinary job) are requested for work performed by an Assistant State Attorney for Dade County who has no specialized expertise in areas relevant to the consideration of civil settlements. These charges are not necessary, reasonable, nor with

r. Epstein, through counsel, with the knowledge and consent of the United States Attorney Mr. Acosta and First Assistant Mr. EFTA00614563 Page 6 Sloman, was pursuing his right to review the Agreement through meetings and filings with the Department of Justice in Washington IU, a review process that

significant issue given that the Plaintiff is seeking over $1,000,000 in fees generated by two non-firm lawyers, one of whom remained employed as a Dade County Assistant State Attorney while billing over $700,000 for her work on the Epstein matters. The Agreement should be constructed to implicitly limit t