Epstein Secrets

our client to agree to unconscionable contract terms cannot square with the true facts of this case. As explained in letters from Messrs. Acosta and Sloman, the indictment was postponed for more than five months to allow you and Mr. Epstein's other attorneys to make presentations to the Office to convi

of a trial. Sincerely, R. Alexander Acosta United States Attorney By: Assistant United States Attorney cc: R. Alexander Acosta, U.S. Attorney Jeffrey Sloman, First Assistant U.S. Attorney You also accuse me of "broaden[ing] the scope of the investigation without any foundation for doing so by adding cha

EBRUARY 2, 2007 PAGE 3 District of Florida. T state that there have been no additional promises or representations ' made to me by any official of the United States Government or by my attorney in connection with this matter. Dated: Witnessed by: James L. Eisenberg, Esquire EFTA00185233 U.S. Department of Justice Au

Dexter (USAFLS) <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 12:36 PM To: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) Cc: Senior, Robert (USAFLS); Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Revised Notification to Victims regarding right to see Epstein agreement. Marie, 31 Does Epstein's lawyer not want th

jective for Epstein, but if they're satisfied with that language, that's fine. As long as the victims know there is an agreement between Epstein and the U.S. Government, I believe we have complied with Judge Marra's order. Dexter From: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 12:19 PM T

Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 12:44 PM To: Lee, Dexter (USAFLS) Cc: Senior, Robert (USAFLS); Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Revised Notification to Victims regarding right to see Epstein agreement. I li Dexter — Jay's complaint was that we we

jective for Epstein, but if they're satisfied with that language, that's fine. As long as the victims know there is an agreement between Epstein and the U.S. Government, I believe we have complied with Judge Marra's order. Dexter From: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 12:19 PM T

AFLS) From: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 12:44 PM To: Lee, Dexter (USAFLS) Cc: Senior, Robert (USAFLS); Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Revised Notification to Victims regarding right to see Epstein agreement. Hi Dexter — Jay's complaint was that we were

ective for Epstein, but if they're satisfied with that language, that's fine. As long as the victims know there is an agreement between Epstein and the U.S. Government, I believe we have complied with Judge Marra's order. Dexter From: Viliafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 12:19 PM To

AFLS) From: Lee, Dexter (USAFLS) Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 12:38 PM To: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) Cc: Senior, Robert (USAFLS); Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Revised Notification to Victims regarding right to see Epstein agreement. Marie, Does Epstein's lawyer not want the v

ective for Epstein, but if they're satisfied with that language, that's fine. As long as the victims know there is an agreement between Epstein and the U.S. Government, I believe we have complied with Judge Marra's order. Dexter From: Vlllafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 12:19 PM To

isher Nlilecember 11, 2007 letter, Lefkowitz to Acosta Attorney General Guidelines (2005), Victim and Witness Assistance November 27, 2007 email, Sloman to Lefkowitz • December 26, 2007 letter, Lefkowitz to Acosta Complaint, E.W. v. Epstein (CW) Complaint, L.M. I. Epstein (TM) S/A Kuyrkendall Decl

FEBRUARY 2, 2007 PAGE 3 District of Florida. I state that there have been no additional promises or representations made to me by any official of the United States Government or by my attorney in connection with this matter. Dated: Witnessed by: James L. Eisenberg, Esquire EFTA00185336 U.S. Department of Justice Au

gainst me during the negotiations. Q. Is this part of your work product that you're waiving right now? MR. SWEDER: No, no. A. My conversation with Jeffrey Sloman is not work product. MR. SCOTT: Here's a -- BY MR. SCAROLA: Q. What is the work product -- MR. SCOTT: Excuse me. Please review wo MwA HM B@ WHY

August of 2009, Bob Josefsberg -~ who is, from what I understood, a very well-regarded lawyer here in Florida; in fact, a lawyer that was selected by the United States Government to represent a number of the -- of the girls that had been sexually abused by Jeffrey Epstein. He was -- he was part of the procedure that was includ