Epstein Secrets

negotiations Work Product Deliberative Process Investigative Privilege 12 8/3/2007 Email from Marie Villafafia to Matt Menchel, Andrew Lourie, Jeff Sloman, and Karen Atkinson regarding draft response to correspondence from Epstein counsel and planned investigative steps if agreement cannot be reache

request to delay his change of plea WP DP 83 11/2/2007-11/5/2007 emails between AMCV and Jeff Sloman regarding drafting 11/5/2007 letter from Sloman to Lefkowitz WP DP 84 11/5/2007-11/7/2007 emails from AMCV to Jeff Sloman inquiring about status of matter and contact by Epstein investigators

" containing attorney research Work product Box #1 P-003679 Thru P-003680 File folder entitled "Serene Cano (N.Y. AUSA)" containing attorney (Villafafla) handwritten notes Work product Box #1 P-003681 Thru P-003687 File folder entitled "Dr. Anna Salter" containing attorney (Villafafia) memo to

LY-01 through OLY-81, correspondence and research related to enforcement of same, documents produced in response to some subpoenas; and attorney (Villafafla) handwritten notes 6(e) Work Product Contains documents subject to investigative privilege Also contains documents subject to privacy rights of

orized release; Material Severable; Redaction; No Assertion by Victims Box #2 P-008517 Thru P-008535 6/25/2007 Letter from Gerald Lefcourt to Jeffrey Sloman and Andrew Lourie [pursuant to Court's Order, not being withheld as privileged — will be produced to opposing counsel upon lift of stay by 11th C

onship; Claims Against Public Prosecutor; Overriding Need; Attorney Conduct at Issue Suppl. Box #3 P-013334 Thru File folder entitled "11/13/07 Sloman to Leflcowitz (was this sent?)" containing draft 11/13/07 letter from J. Sloman Attorney-Client Privilege Inadequate Log; No Factual Underpinning

Public Prosecutor, Attorney Conduct at Issue Box #1 P-004561 Thru P-004565 Filed folder entitled "JANUSZ BANASIAK" containing attorney (Villafafla) handwritten notes of interview Work product Investigative privilege • Inadequate Log; No Factual Underpinnings; Fiduciary Duty; Not in Anticipa

tate that you intend to issue the victim notification letters o rda December 7. However, in a discussion late last week between Jeff Sloman and Mr. Sloman indicated that your Office would send us a revised version o e non on letter, which we have not received to date. ,While we believe that it is who

age 2 Finally, you state that you intend to issue the victim notification letters o rda December 7. However, in a discussion late last week between Jeff Sloman and Mr. Sloman indicated that your Office would send us a revised version o e non on letter, which we have not received to date. ,While we believ

osta met with Kirkland & Ellis partners Jay Lefkowitz and former Solicitor General Ken Starr and Ms. Sanchez, along with Chief Oosterbahn and AUSAs Villafafla, John McMillan, and FAUSA S lomat' Messrs. Starr and Lefkowitz presented arguments regarding the sufficiency of the federal interest in the case and