Epstein Secrets

ctored into the Office's decision on what remedies it will pursue in connection with this most recent breach and any future violations. Sincerely, Jeffrey H. Sloman Acting United States Attorney By: cc: Assistant United tares Attorney EFTA00213052 Exhibit 2 EFTA00213053 IN RE: INVESTIGATION OF JEFFREY

statute. I would note that the United States provided the draft letter to defense as a courtesy. In addition, First Assistant United States Attorney Sloman already incorporated in the letter several edits that had been requested by defense counsel. I agree that Section 3771 applies to notice of proceed

ew process for either Mr. Epstein or CEOS. I leave it to you and CEOS to figure out how best to proceed and will await the results of that process. Jeff Sloman, FAUSA EFTA00213086 Exhibit 9 EFTA00213087 Mr. Lefkowitz, 05/28/2008 04:51 PM To cc bcc Subject Jeffrey Epstein The United States Attorne

directed them to consult with the subject matter experts in the Criminal -5- EFTA00213073 12/04/07 TUE 18:48 FAX 305 530 8440 EXECUTIVE OFFICE Division's Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section to confirm our interpretation of the law before approving their indictment package. I am thus surprised to

ctored into the Office's decision on what remedies it will pursue in connection with this most recent breach and any future violations. Sincerely, Jeffrey H. Sloman Acting United States Attorney By: A. Marie Villafafia Assistant United States Attorney cc: Karen Atkinson, Chief, Northern Division EFTA002345

statute. I would note that the United States provided the draft letter to defense as a courtesy. In addition, First Assistant United States Attorney Sloman already incorporated in the letter several edits that had been requested by defense counsel. I agree that Section 3771 applies to notice of proceed

Ellts 02/291200803:11 PM Dear Alex, To [email protected] cc [email protected] bce Subject Fw: Epstein I received the attached email from Jeff Sloman this week and to put it mildly, I was shocked. As you will recall, back at the beginning of January, when we both agreed that there were significant

directed them to consult with the subject matter experts in the Criminal -5- EFTA00234595 12/04/07 TUE 18:48 FAX 305 530 8440 EXECUTIVE OFFICE Division's Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section to confirm our interpretation of the law before approving their indictment package. I am thus surprised to

our client to agree to unconscionable contract terms cannot square with the true facts of this case. As explained in letters from Messrs. Acosta and Sloman, the indictment was postponed for more than five months to allow you and Mr. Epstein's other attorneys to make presentations to the Office to convi

l. Sincerely, IL Alexander Acosta United States Attorney By: 1111111M Assistant United States Attorney cc: R. Alexander Acosta, U.S. Attorney Jeffrey Sloman, First Assistant U.S. Attorney You also accuse me of "broaden[ing] the scope of the investigation without any foundation for doing so by adding cha

irected than to consult with the subject matter experts in the Criminal 0 006 EFTA00213819 12/04/07 TOE 16:18 FAX 30S S30 6440 EXECUTIVE OFFICs Division's Child Rep!citation and Obscenity Section to confirm our interpretation of the law before approving their indictment package. I am thus surprised to

s to reaffirm, or to unwind, the Agreement. Sincerely, It ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY cc: Alice Fisher, Assistant Attorney General Jeffrey Sloman, First Assistant U.S. Attorney AUSA A. Marie Villafaila -7- EFTA00731648

ected them to consult with the subject matter experts in the Criminal -5- EFTA00731646 12/04/07 TUE 16:48 FAX 305 530 6440 EXECUTIVE OFFICE 007 Division's Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section to confirm our interpretation of the law before approving their indictment package. I am thus surprised to

our client to agree to unconscionable contract terms cannot square with the true facts of this case. As explained in letters from Messrs. Acosta and Sloman, the indictment was postponed for more than five months to allow you and Mr. Epstein's other attorneys to make presentations to the Office to convi

irected than to consult with the subject matter experts in the Criminal 0 006 EFTA00207612 12/04/07 TUE 16:18 FAX 30S 530 6440 EXECUTIVE OFFICE Division's Child RepIntuition and Obscenity Section to confirm our interpretation of the law before approving their indictment package. I am thus surprised to

riate compensation to the victims. This provision of the Agreement was heavily negotiated. As Mr. Lefkowitz wrote in his November 29th e-mail to Mr. Sloman, which we received the same day as your letter, your client "offered to provide a restitution fund for the alleged victims in this matter; however

prosecutors' evidence and legal analysis, I nonetheless directed them to consult with the subject matter experts in the Criminal -5- EFTA00176162 Division's Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section to confirm our interpretation of the law before approving their indictment package. I am thus surprised to

our client to agree to unconscionable contract terms cannot square with the true facts of this case. As explained in letters from Messrs. Acosta and Sloman, the indictment was postponed for more than five months to allow you and Mr. Epstein's other attorneys to make presentations to the Office to convi

ected them to consult with the subject matter experts in the Criminal Ill Doe EFTA00289819 12/04/07 TUE 16:t8 FAX 30$ 230 6440 EXECUTIVE OFFICE Division's Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section to confirm ow interpretation of the law before approving their indictment package. t am thus surprised to r