Document Mentions (3 shared documents)

EFTA00185206_sub_001 - EFTA00185206_100

3 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

our client to agree to unconscionable contract terms cannot square with the true facts of this case. As explained in letters from Messrs. Acosta and Sloman, the indictment was postponed for more than five months to allow you and Mr. Epstein's other attorneys to make presentations to the Office to convi

of a trial. Sincerely, R. Alexander Acosta United States Attorney By: Assistant United States Attorney cc: R. Alexander Acosta, U.S. Attorney Jeffrey Sloman, First Assistant U.S. Attorney You also accuse me of "broaden[ing] the scope of the investigation without any foundation for doing so by adding cha

r'a the on. you stayed an drinking All /1 night ono night loot year when your dad reported you 12 Alpine 13 A. Ws, alt. 14 0. lidedehor the Meehan ono you were 15 ouppased to go to? 16 A. Mo. sir. 17 O. Did you peek to ~atop this 1.6 COP? 19 MO. air. 20 O. MOw about Nat 21 A.

EFTA00188312_sub_002 - EFTA00188312_170

2 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

/2007 EFTA00188433 United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida NEWS BRIEFING To: R. Alexander Acosta, United States Attorney Jeffrey H. Sloman, First Assistant James Swain, Executive Assistant Alicia O. Valle, Special Counsel Robert Senior, Chief, Criminal Division Kenneth Noto, Deputy C

123: Peter Cinceni's Emporia Armani shirt from Emporio Amon boutimes nationwide: Ralph Lauren suspenders from selected Polo Ralph Laren storm: km Meehan for WSW ScImpfer Management Page 140: Noes Cocottes shirt by Thomas Pink; nil by Giorgio Annoni; lie by DKNY; Brioni mat by special ceder from

EFTA00226107_email_074

2 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) From: Vi°Mena. Ann Mane C. (USAFLS) Sent: Tuesday. July 31, 2007 1:37 PM To: Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS); Menchel, Matthew (USAFLS); Lourie. Andrew (USAFLS) Subject: Emailing: Conf Plea Negotiations.wpd Attachments: Conf Plea Negotiati

ntentions, holding that the plaintiffs' relationships with their dioceses, that of mere parishioners, did not consti- tute fiduciary relationships. Meehan, 870 Aid at 922 n. 9; Baselice, 879 Aid at 279 n. 4. The court reasoned that the plaintiffs' relationships with their dioceses were too general i