Epstein Secrets

ctored into the Office's decision on what remedies it will pursue in connection with this most recent breach and any future violations. Sincerely, Jeffrey H. Sloman Acting United States Attorney By: cc: Assistant United tares Attorney EFTA00213052 Exhibit 2 EFTA00213053 IN RE: INVESTIGATION OF JEFFREY

statute. I would note that the United States provided the draft letter to defense as a courtesy. In addition, First Assistant United States Attorney Sloman already incorporated in the letter several edits that had been requested by defense counsel. I agree that Section 3771 applies to notice of proceed

ew process for either Mr. Epstein or CEOS. I leave it to you and CEOS to figure out how best to proceed and will await the results of that process. Jeff Sloman, FAUSA EFTA00213086 Exhibit 9 EFTA00213087 Mr. Lefkowitz, 05/28/2008 04:51 PM To cc bcc Subject Jeffrey Epstein The United States Attorne

otification Letter. You write that you don't understand the basis for the Office's belief that it is appropriate to notify the victims. Pursuant to the "Justice for All Act of2004," crime victims are entitled to: "The right to reasonable, accurate, and timely notice of any public court proceeding ... involving the crime" and t

ctored into the Office's decision on what remedies it will pursue in connection with this most recent breach and any future violations. Sincerely, Jeffrey H. Sloman Acting United States Attorney By: A. Marie Villafafia Assistant United States Attorney cc: Karen Atkinson, Chief, Northern Division EFTA002345

statute. I would note that the United States provided the draft letter to defense as a courtesy. In addition, First Assistant United States Attorney Sloman already incorporated in the letter several edits that had been requested by defense counsel. I agree that Section 3771 applies to notice of proceed

Ellts 02/291200803:11 PM Dear Alex, To [email protected] cc [email protected] bce Subject Fw: Epstein I received the attached email from Jeff Sloman this week and to put it mildly, I was shocked. As you will recall, back at the beginning of January, when we both agreed that there were significant

otification Letter. You write that you don't understand the basis for the Office's belief that it is appropriate to notify the victims. Pursuant to the "Justice for All Act of2004," crime victims are entitled to: "The right to reasonable, accurate, and timely notice of any public court proceeding ... involving the crime" and t

occur no later than December 14, 2007. There must be closure in this matter. Sincerely, R. Alexander Acosta United States Ajtomay By: Jeffrey . Sloman First Assistant United States Attorney Enclosure cc: R. Alexander Acosta, U.S. Attorney AUSA A. Marie Villafana 2This is contingent, however, o

otification Letter. You write that you don't understand the basis for the Office's belief that it is appropriate to notify the victims. Pursuant to the "Justice for All Act of2004," crime victims are entitled to: "The right to reasonable, accurate, and timely notice of any public court proceeding . . involving the crime" and t

occur no later than December 14, 2007. There must be closure in this matter. Sincerely, R. Alexander Acosta United States Ajtomay By: Jeffrey . Sloman First Assistant United States Attorney Enclosure cc: R. Alexander Acosta, U.S. Attorney AUSA A. Marie Villafana 2This is contingent, however, o

otification Letter. You write that you don't understand the basis for the Office's belief that it is appropriate to notify the victims. Pursuant to the "Justice for All Act of2004," crime victims are entitled to: "The right to reasonable, accurate, and timely notice of any public court proceeding . . involving the crime" and t